Understanding the challenge of developing pedagogical reasoning in initial teacher education: Theorising as practice-focused research

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
David Morrison-Love, Fiona Patrick
{"title":"Understanding the challenge of developing pedagogical reasoning in initial teacher education: Theorising as practice-focused research","authors":"David Morrison-Love,&nbsp;Fiona Patrick","doi":"10.1002/berj.4167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this paper, we theorise our practice as teacher educators to understand a practice issue: the challenge our students had in developing pedagogical reasoning. The article discusses the findings of the theorising process to explore how pedagogical reasoning is developed and why it is challenging. It also provides an approach for theorising and exemplifies the process. We first explain our practice issue before outlining a framework for theorising adapted from the work of Stepney and Thomson, and Coghlan and Rigg. The approach involved abductive reasoning through reflexive conversations and written accounts of practice in relation to the findings of an integrative literature review, our personal practical theories and our earlier research into the practice issue. Theorising led us to understand pedagogical reasoning as a complex process emerging from the integration of different forms of knowledge across Initial Teacher Education programmes. This integration depends on the formation of epistemic relations and requires an explicit intellectual endeavour between students and teacher educators. We explore how we might encourage this endeavour through the ideas of intellectual space, epistemic coherence and slow pedagogy. We also make the case for theorising to be considered as a form of practice-focused research and hope to encourage others to engage with its transformative potential for understanding persistent practice issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":51410,"journal":{"name":"British Educational Research Journal","volume":"51 4","pages":"1904-1926"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/berj.4167","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Educational Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/berj.4167","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we theorise our practice as teacher educators to understand a practice issue: the challenge our students had in developing pedagogical reasoning. The article discusses the findings of the theorising process to explore how pedagogical reasoning is developed and why it is challenging. It also provides an approach for theorising and exemplifies the process. We first explain our practice issue before outlining a framework for theorising adapted from the work of Stepney and Thomson, and Coghlan and Rigg. The approach involved abductive reasoning through reflexive conversations and written accounts of practice in relation to the findings of an integrative literature review, our personal practical theories and our earlier research into the practice issue. Theorising led us to understand pedagogical reasoning as a complex process emerging from the integration of different forms of knowledge across Initial Teacher Education programmes. This integration depends on the formation of epistemic relations and requires an explicit intellectual endeavour between students and teacher educators. We explore how we might encourage this endeavour through the ideas of intellectual space, epistemic coherence and slow pedagogy. We also make the case for theorising to be considered as a form of practice-focused research and hope to encourage others to engage with its transformative potential for understanding persistent practice issues.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

理解在初级教师教育中发展教学推理的挑战:理论化作为以实践为中心的研究
在本文中,我们将我们作为教师教育者的实践理论化,以理解一个实践问题:我们的学生在发展教学推理方面所面临的挑战。本文讨论了理论化过程的发现,以探索教学推理是如何发展的,以及为什么它具有挑战性。它还提供了一种理论化的方法,并举例说明了这一过程。我们首先解释我们的实践问题,然后根据斯蒂芬妮和汤姆森、科格兰和里格的工作概述一个理论化框架。该方法包括通过反思性对话进行溯因推理,并根据综合文献综述的发现、我们的个人实践理论和我们对实践问题的早期研究对实践进行书面描述。理论化使我们认识到教学推理是一个复杂的过程,它来自于不同形式的知识在初级教师教育项目中的整合。这种整合依赖于认识关系的形成,需要学生和教师教育者之间明确的智力努力。我们将探讨如何通过知识空间、认知一致性和慢速教学法等理念来鼓励这种努力。我们还提出了将理论化视为一种以实践为中心的研究形式的案例,并希望鼓励其他人参与其理解持续实践问题的变革潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Educational Research Journal
British Educational Research Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The British Educational Research Journal is an international peer reviewed medium for the publication of articles of interest to researchers in education and has rapidly become a major focal point for the publication of educational research from throughout the world. For further information on the association please visit the British Educational Research Association web site. The journal is interdisciplinary in approach, and includes reports of case studies, experiments and surveys, discussions of conceptual and methodological issues and of underlying assumptions in educational research, accounts of research in progress, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信