Serodiagnosis of strongyloidiasis in a low-endemic setting – a two-tiered test approach

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Sebastian Albermann , Anne Vischer , Xuan Lan Vu , Anja Horat , Felix Grimm , Beatrice Nickel , Bruno Gottstein , Cédric Hirzel , Alexander Oberli
{"title":"Serodiagnosis of strongyloidiasis in a low-endemic setting – a two-tiered test approach","authors":"Sebastian Albermann ,&nbsp;Anne Vischer ,&nbsp;Xuan Lan Vu ,&nbsp;Anja Horat ,&nbsp;Felix Grimm ,&nbsp;Beatrice Nickel ,&nbsp;Bruno Gottstein ,&nbsp;Cédric Hirzel ,&nbsp;Alexander Oberli","doi":"10.1016/j.tmaid.2025.102890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Previous studies have demonstrated that <em>Strongyloides</em> ELISAs frequently exhibit cross-reactivity with infections caused by other helminths. This may result in false-positive results, especially in low-endemic areas, potentially leading to unwarranted treatment. This study aimed to present a new Western blot for the detection of anti-<em>Strongyloides</em> antibodies such as to enhance the accuracy of distinguishing true-positive from false-positive ELISA results.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We developed and validated a Western blot to detect anti-<em>S. stercoralis</em> specific antibodies using reference sera from confirmed cases (n = 55), non-infected control patients (n = 20), and patients with other helminth infections (n = 50). Using this sample set, we evaluated the analytical performance of three serologic approaches: an in-house ELISA, the commercially available Bordier-ELISA, and a two-tiered testing procedure combining the in-house ELISA with a confirmatory Western blot. Using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis, setting-specific cut-offs values were determined for both ELISA assays. Further, we conducted a retrospective cohort study using serum samples from solid organ transplant (SOT) candidates (n = 310) tested by ELISA during pre-transplant evaluations at Bern University Hospital (2018–2022).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The Western blot specifically detected human IgG antibodies against <em>S. stercoralis</em>. A two-tier test algorithm (in-house ELISA, followed by confirmatory Western blot) showed a diagnostic sensitivity of 96.4 % (95 %CI:87.5 %–99.6 %) and a diagnostic specificity of 98.6 % (95 %CI:92.3 %–100 %). Out of 310 SOT candidates’ serum samples, 9.3 % (n = 29) exhibited positive, and 5.2 % (n = 16) equivocal ELISA results. Testing by Western blot revealed positive <em>S. stercoralis</em> findings for 11.1 % (n = 5) of these patients. Two of those were initially positive and 3 were equivocal by ELISA.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The new Western blot is a promising tool for clarifying equivocal <em>S. stercoralis</em> ELISA results, and therefore predisposed to reduce false positive <em>Strongyloides</em> ELISA results, especially in low-endemic regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23312,"journal":{"name":"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 102890"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477893925000961","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Previous studies have demonstrated that Strongyloides ELISAs frequently exhibit cross-reactivity with infections caused by other helminths. This may result in false-positive results, especially in low-endemic areas, potentially leading to unwarranted treatment. This study aimed to present a new Western blot for the detection of anti-Strongyloides antibodies such as to enhance the accuracy of distinguishing true-positive from false-positive ELISA results.

Methods

We developed and validated a Western blot to detect anti-S. stercoralis specific antibodies using reference sera from confirmed cases (n = 55), non-infected control patients (n = 20), and patients with other helminth infections (n = 50). Using this sample set, we evaluated the analytical performance of three serologic approaches: an in-house ELISA, the commercially available Bordier-ELISA, and a two-tiered testing procedure combining the in-house ELISA with a confirmatory Western blot. Using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis, setting-specific cut-offs values were determined for both ELISA assays. Further, we conducted a retrospective cohort study using serum samples from solid organ transplant (SOT) candidates (n = 310) tested by ELISA during pre-transplant evaluations at Bern University Hospital (2018–2022).

Results

The Western blot specifically detected human IgG antibodies against S. stercoralis. A two-tier test algorithm (in-house ELISA, followed by confirmatory Western blot) showed a diagnostic sensitivity of 96.4 % (95 %CI:87.5 %–99.6 %) and a diagnostic specificity of 98.6 % (95 %CI:92.3 %–100 %). Out of 310 SOT candidates’ serum samples, 9.3 % (n = 29) exhibited positive, and 5.2 % (n = 16) equivocal ELISA results. Testing by Western blot revealed positive S. stercoralis findings for 11.1 % (n = 5) of these patients. Two of those were initially positive and 3 were equivocal by ELISA.

Conclusions

The new Western blot is a promising tool for clarifying equivocal S. stercoralis ELISA results, and therefore predisposed to reduce false positive Strongyloides ELISA results, especially in low-endemic regions.
在低流行环境下的圆线虫病的血清诊断——两层检测方法
以往的研究表明,类圆线虫酶联免疫吸附试验经常与其他蠕虫引起的感染表现出交叉反应性。这可能导致假阳性结果,特别是在低流行地区,可能导致不必要的治疗。本研究旨在建立一种新的Western blot检测抗类圆线虫抗体的方法,以提高ELISA检测结果的真阳性和假阳性的准确性。方法建立并验证了Western blot法检测抗s。使用确诊病例(55例)、未感染对照患者(20例)和其他蠕虫感染患者(50例)的参比血清检测粪虫特异性抗体。使用该样本集,我们评估了三种血清学方法的分析性能:内部ELISA,市售的Bordier-ELISA,以及结合内部ELISA和验证性Western blot的两层检测程序。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析,确定两种ELISA检测的设定特异性截止值。此外,我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,使用了伯尔尼大学医院(2018-2022)在移植前评估期间通过ELISA检测的实体器官移植(SOT)候选者(n = 310)的血清样本。结果Western blot特异检测到人抗粪球菌IgG抗体。两层检测算法(内部ELISA,然后是验证性Western blot)显示诊断敏感性为96.4% (95% CI: 87.5% - 99.6%),诊断特异性为98.6% (95% CI: 92.3% - 100%)。在310例SOT候选血清样本中,9.3% (n = 29)表现出阳性,5.2% (n = 16)表现出模棱两可的ELISA结果。Western blot检测显示,11.1% (n = 5)患者的粪球菌阳性。其中2例最初呈阳性,3例ELISA结果不明确。结论新的Western blot是一种很有前途的工具,可以澄清模棱两可的粪球菌ELISA结果,因此易于减少假阳性的类圆线虫ELISA结果,特别是在低流行地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
19.40
自引率
1.70%
发文量
211
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease Publication Scope: Publishes original papers, reviews, and consensus papers Primary theme: infectious disease in the context of travel medicine Focus Areas: Epidemiology and surveillance of travel-related illness Prevention and treatment of travel-associated infections Malaria prevention and treatment Travellers' diarrhoea Infections associated with mass gatherings Migration-related infections Vaccines and vaccine-preventable disease Global policy/regulations for disease prevention and control Practical clinical issues for travel and tropical medicine practitioners Coverage: Addresses areas of controversy and debate in travel medicine Aims to inform guidelines and policy pertinent to travel medicine and the prevention of infectious disease Publication Features: Offers a fast peer-review process Provides early online publication of accepted manuscripts Aims to publish cutting-edge papers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信