Waste to emerging and sustainable wealth: An integrated mining 4.0-recycling 4.0-decision making 4.0 framework overcoming greener red mud recycling technologies promotion

IF 7.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Mohammad Shamsi , Mohammad Zakerinejad , Mohammad Reza Zareifard
{"title":"Waste to emerging and sustainable wealth: An integrated mining 4.0-recycling 4.0-decision making 4.0 framework overcoming greener red mud recycling technologies promotion","authors":"Mohammad Shamsi ,&nbsp;Mohammad Zakerinejad ,&nbsp;Mohammad Reza Zareifard","doi":"10.1016/j.eti.2025.104440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a comprehensive, three-phase framework for selecting an optimal technological solution for repurposing Red Mud (RM) based on a green mining approach. The framework introduces a novel ZE-FSIWEC method in Phase 1 for Mining 4.0 criteria weighting. In Phase 2, Fuzzy-Delphi method (FDM) screens key Recycling 4.0 alternatives, followed by a combination of eight multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods including ARLON (2024), RAWEC (2024), MARA (2022), COBRA (2022), RAFSI, MAIRCA, MABAC, and ARAS for ranking. To address uncertainties, enhance decision reliability, and improve group decision credibility, fuzzy ZE-numbers are merged with Decision-Making 4.0 methods, which are then consolidated using Borda-count and Copeland ranking for a robust assessment. Iran was chosen as the analysis subject, with Phase 1 evaluating the national participants' perspectives, and Phase 2 focusing on the local site participants' viewpoints. In the final phase, the framework culminates in the development of a quantifiable RM Management Sustainability Score (RMMSS) to identify the most suitable strategic supply planning of RM residues among different Recycling 4.0 technologies and enhance mining waste management standards. Therefore, the proposed tech-paradigm based framework demonstrates its efficiency in a scenario where mining enterprises aim to market their RM. Sensitivity analysis shows the reliability of ZE-FSIWEC-ZE-RAWEC method, with a Spearman's correlation over 86.9 %, making it promising for future research. The Jajarm alumina complex case study showcases the framework's remarkable impact. This framework demonstrates its practicality and region-independent adaptability, contributing to a greener future by promoting sustainable practices and transforming hazardous RM waste into valuable assets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11725,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 104440"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186425004262","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive, three-phase framework for selecting an optimal technological solution for repurposing Red Mud (RM) based on a green mining approach. The framework introduces a novel ZE-FSIWEC method in Phase 1 for Mining 4.0 criteria weighting. In Phase 2, Fuzzy-Delphi method (FDM) screens key Recycling 4.0 alternatives, followed by a combination of eight multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods including ARLON (2024), RAWEC (2024), MARA (2022), COBRA (2022), RAFSI, MAIRCA, MABAC, and ARAS for ranking. To address uncertainties, enhance decision reliability, and improve group decision credibility, fuzzy ZE-numbers are merged with Decision-Making 4.0 methods, which are then consolidated using Borda-count and Copeland ranking for a robust assessment. Iran was chosen as the analysis subject, with Phase 1 evaluating the national participants' perspectives, and Phase 2 focusing on the local site participants' viewpoints. In the final phase, the framework culminates in the development of a quantifiable RM Management Sustainability Score (RMMSS) to identify the most suitable strategic supply planning of RM residues among different Recycling 4.0 technologies and enhance mining waste management standards. Therefore, the proposed tech-paradigm based framework demonstrates its efficiency in a scenario where mining enterprises aim to market their RM. Sensitivity analysis shows the reliability of ZE-FSIWEC-ZE-RAWEC method, with a Spearman's correlation over 86.9 %, making it promising for future research. The Jajarm alumina complex case study showcases the framework's remarkable impact. This framework demonstrates its practicality and region-independent adaptability, contributing to a greener future by promoting sustainable practices and transforming hazardous RM waste into valuable assets.
废物到新兴和可持续财富:克服绿色赤泥回收技术推广的综合采矿4.0-回收4.0-决策4.0框架
本研究提出了一个全面的、三个阶段的框架,用于选择基于绿色采矿方法的红泥(RM)再利用的最佳技术解决方案。该框架在第一阶段引入了一种新的ZE-FSIWEC方法,用于采矿4.0标准加权。在第二阶段,模糊特尔菲法(FDM)筛选关键的回收4.0备选方案,然后结合ARLON(2024)、RAWEC(2024)、MARA(2022)、COBRA(2022)、RAFSI、MAIRCA、MABAC和ARAS等八种多标准决策(MCDM)方法进行排名。为了解决不确定性,提高决策可靠性,提高群体决策可信度,模糊ze数与决策4.0方法合并,然后使用borda计数和Copeland排名进行稳健评估。伊朗被选为分析对象,第一阶段评估国家参与者的观点,第二阶段侧重于当地现场参与者的观点。在最后阶段,该框架最终制定了可量化的RM管理可持续性评分(RMMSS),以确定不同回收4.0技术中RM残留物最合适的战略供应规划,并提高采矿废物管理标准。因此,所提出的基于技术范式的框架在采矿企业以营销其RM为目标的场景中证明了其有效性。灵敏度分析表明,ZE-FSIWEC-ZE-RAWEC方法的可靠性,Spearman相关系数大于86.9 %,具有较好的应用前景。Jajarm氧化铝复杂案例研究展示了该框架的显著影响。该框架展示了其实用性和区域独立适应性,通过促进可持续实践和将危险的RM废物转化为有价值的资产,为更绿色的未来做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Environmental Technology & Innovation Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
435
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Technology & Innovation adopts a challenge-oriented approach to solutions by integrating natural sciences to promote a sustainable future. The journal aims to foster the creation and development of innovative products, technologies, and ideas that enhance the environment, with impacts across soil, air, water, and food in rural and urban areas. As a platform for disseminating scientific evidence for environmental protection and sustainable development, the journal emphasizes fundamental science, methodologies, tools, techniques, and policy considerations. It emphasizes the importance of science and technology in environmental benefits, including smarter, cleaner technologies for environmental protection, more efficient resource processing methods, and the evidence supporting their effectiveness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信