Influence of compression stockings with different compression classes on lower leg edema and perceived discomfort during a two-hour static standing exposure – a pilot study
Tessy Luger , Nicole Bott , Robert Seibt, Julia Gabriel, Anne Griese, Angela N. Enghofer, Monika A. Rieger, Benjamin Steinhilber
{"title":"Influence of compression stockings with different compression classes on lower leg edema and perceived discomfort during a two-hour static standing exposure – a pilot study","authors":"Tessy Luger , Nicole Bott , Robert Seibt, Julia Gabriel, Anne Griese, Angela N. Enghofer, Monika A. Rieger, Benjamin Steinhilber","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lower leg edema (LLE) is considered a surrogate-parameter for stress on the venous system in situations with venous hypertension such as standing at work. Therapy with medical compression stockings (MCS) is well-established in chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) patients for reducing venous pressure. It remains unclear though to what extent increased levels of LLE related to prolonged standing can be diminished by MCS in healthy individuals as well as CVI patients. This paper investigated to what extent wearing MCS class I (CCL I) and II (CCL II) reduces LLE and rating of perceived discomfort (RPD) during prolonged standing among both healthy subjects (n = 32) and CVI patients (n = 12) and how wearing comfort differs between classes. This randomized cross-over trial had three conditions: two-hour standing without MCS, with CCL I (18–21 mmHg), with CCL II (23–32 mmHg). LLE was quantified using waterplethysmography and bioelectrical impedance. RPD was assessed using an 11-point Likert scale. Wearing comfort was assessed using a self-developed questionnaire. Wearing MCS statistically significantly reduced LLE in healthy subjects and CVI patients, with least edema development after wearing CCL II. RPD was reported mainly in the lower-back after two hours (mean 0.9). Wearing comfort was rated slightly better for CCL I. Healthy subjects and CVI patients who spend large parts of the day standing can decrease LLE by wearing MCS, of which CCL I may lead to better long-term compliance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55502,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ergonomics","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 104621"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687025001577","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Lower leg edema (LLE) is considered a surrogate-parameter for stress on the venous system in situations with venous hypertension such as standing at work. Therapy with medical compression stockings (MCS) is well-established in chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) patients for reducing venous pressure. It remains unclear though to what extent increased levels of LLE related to prolonged standing can be diminished by MCS in healthy individuals as well as CVI patients. This paper investigated to what extent wearing MCS class I (CCL I) and II (CCL II) reduces LLE and rating of perceived discomfort (RPD) during prolonged standing among both healthy subjects (n = 32) and CVI patients (n = 12) and how wearing comfort differs between classes. This randomized cross-over trial had three conditions: two-hour standing without MCS, with CCL I (18–21 mmHg), with CCL II (23–32 mmHg). LLE was quantified using waterplethysmography and bioelectrical impedance. RPD was assessed using an 11-point Likert scale. Wearing comfort was assessed using a self-developed questionnaire. Wearing MCS statistically significantly reduced LLE in healthy subjects and CVI patients, with least edema development after wearing CCL II. RPD was reported mainly in the lower-back after two hours (mean 0.9). Wearing comfort was rated slightly better for CCL I. Healthy subjects and CVI patients who spend large parts of the day standing can decrease LLE by wearing MCS, of which CCL I may lead to better long-term compliance.
期刊介绍:
Applied Ergonomics is aimed at ergonomists and all those interested in applying ergonomics/human factors in the design, planning and management of technical and social systems at work or leisure. Readership is truly international with subscribers in over 50 countries. Professionals for whom Applied Ergonomics is of interest include: ergonomists, designers, industrial engineers, health and safety specialists, systems engineers, design engineers, organizational psychologists, occupational health specialists and human-computer interaction specialists.