M.I. Brand , E.G. Obbard , C. Wilson , J. Naish , G. Kamal , J. Astbury , P.A. Burr
{"title":"Material selection charts for optimised radiation shielding","authors":"M.I. Brand , E.G. Obbard , C. Wilson , J. Naish , G. Kamal , J. Astbury , P.A. Burr","doi":"10.1016/j.mattod.2025.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Material selection charts provide an objective metric to optimise the selection of engineering materials but have never been developed for radiation shielding. This can lead to sub-optimal choices in some cases, as we demonstrate in this paper. We have reformulated the radiation transport problem so that a material metric for any given shielding scenario can be computed, ranked, and mapped onto an <em>Ashby map</em>. By removing bias from the selection process, this has yielded non-obvious or even counter-intuitive candidates for further examination, which outperform the conventional choice of shielding materials, for example metal hydrides for fusion reactors and boranes for fast reactors in space. Key novelties are that this optimisation considers the type and energy spectrum of radiation, the composition of the target being shielded and what type of interactions should be minimised in the target. The high-throughput method, enables investigation of the shielding performance over time, finding that tantalum in a fast neutron flux, displays an improvement in shielding performance over time due to the formation <sup>182</sup>Ta that increases the scattering and absorption of neutrons in lower energy channels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":387,"journal":{"name":"Materials Today","volume":"88 ","pages":"Pages 36-44"},"PeriodicalIF":22.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials Today","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369702125002056","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Material selection charts provide an objective metric to optimise the selection of engineering materials but have never been developed for radiation shielding. This can lead to sub-optimal choices in some cases, as we demonstrate in this paper. We have reformulated the radiation transport problem so that a material metric for any given shielding scenario can be computed, ranked, and mapped onto an Ashby map. By removing bias from the selection process, this has yielded non-obvious or even counter-intuitive candidates for further examination, which outperform the conventional choice of shielding materials, for example metal hydrides for fusion reactors and boranes for fast reactors in space. Key novelties are that this optimisation considers the type and energy spectrum of radiation, the composition of the target being shielded and what type of interactions should be minimised in the target. The high-throughput method, enables investigation of the shielding performance over time, finding that tantalum in a fast neutron flux, displays an improvement in shielding performance over time due to the formation 182Ta that increases the scattering and absorption of neutrons in lower energy channels.
期刊介绍:
Materials Today is the leading journal in the Materials Today family, focusing on the latest and most impactful work in the materials science community. With a reputation for excellence in news and reviews, the journal has now expanded its coverage to include original research and aims to be at the forefront of the field.
We welcome comprehensive articles, short communications, and review articles from established leaders in the rapidly evolving fields of materials science and related disciplines. We strive to provide authors with rigorous peer review, fast publication, and maximum exposure for their work. While we only accept the most significant manuscripts, our speedy evaluation process ensures that there are no unnecessary publication delays.