{"title":"Experimental investigation of double-stage membrane reformer (DSMR) for enhanced hydrogen production via methanol steam reforming","authors":"Keshav Kumar , Sachin Kumar Vishwakarma , Amit Kumar , Sweta Sharma , Rajesh Kumar Upadhyay","doi":"10.1016/j.joei.2025.102236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Methanol steam reforming (MSR) provides an effective option for on-site hydrogen generation through a membrane reformer (MR) equipped with the Pd-based membrane for H<sub>2</sub> separation from the mixture gas produced during MSR. However, a major obstacle toward scale-up and commercialization is the restricted mass and heat transfer across the catalyst bed. Additionally, a substantial quantity of hydrogen is emitted in the retentate that goes unrecovered. Therefore, in the present study, we have used the structured SiC foam coated with Cu-Fe/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-Zn-ZrO<sub>2</sub> (AZZ, Cu-Fe = 50:50 mol ratio, and AZZ = 70:15:12) catalyst to intensify the radial heat and mass transfer inside the reactor. Further, a multi-pass membrane separator (MPMS) is introduced on the retentate side of the MR to recover the leftover hydrogen, the integrated system is termed as a double-stage membrane reformer (DSMR), functioning as a standalone H<sub>2</sub> production and separation module, to effectively separate the unrecovered H<sub>2</sub> from the retentate stream of the MR. The performance of the DSMR was optimized at different temperatures (573–673 K), pressures (100–300 kPaG), weight hourly space velocity (WHSV, 12.23 to 48.92 <span><math><mrow><msub><mtext>kg</mtext><mtext>feed</mtext></msub><msup><mrow><mspace></mspace><mi>h</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>‐</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msup><msubsup><mrow><mspace></mspace><mtext>kg</mtext></mrow><mtext>catalyst</mtext><mrow><mo>‐</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msubsup></mrow></math></span>), and varying membrane areas (65–495 cm<sup>2</sup>). The Cu-Fe/AZZ/SiC catalyst was tested in all three configurations for comparison including traditional reformer (TR), MR, and DSMR at 300 kPaG of pressure, 673 K of temperature, 3/1 of S/C ratio, 187 cm<sup>2</sup> of membrane area, and 12.23 kg<sub>feed</sub> h<sup>−1</sup> kg<sup>−1</sup><sub>catalyst</sub> of WHSV. Following the performance testing a higher methanol conversion is obtained in the case of DSMR. For instance, the methanol conversion of ∼75 % is achieved in the case of DSMR compared to ∼57 % in MR and ∼53 % in TR. Moreover, H<sub>2</sub> recovery of more than 74.5 % is achieved in DSMR which is 8.5 % higher compared to MR. This is attributed to the enhanced hydrogen recovery in DSMR which helped to achieve higher methanol conversion according to the Le Chatelier's principle. This dual-stage configuration improved hydrogen separation and encouraged equilibrium shifting toward the desired product.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17287,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Energy Institute","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 102236"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Energy Institute","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1743967125002648","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Methanol steam reforming (MSR) provides an effective option for on-site hydrogen generation through a membrane reformer (MR) equipped with the Pd-based membrane for H2 separation from the mixture gas produced during MSR. However, a major obstacle toward scale-up and commercialization is the restricted mass and heat transfer across the catalyst bed. Additionally, a substantial quantity of hydrogen is emitted in the retentate that goes unrecovered. Therefore, in the present study, we have used the structured SiC foam coated with Cu-Fe/Al2O3-Zn-ZrO2 (AZZ, Cu-Fe = 50:50 mol ratio, and AZZ = 70:15:12) catalyst to intensify the radial heat and mass transfer inside the reactor. Further, a multi-pass membrane separator (MPMS) is introduced on the retentate side of the MR to recover the leftover hydrogen, the integrated system is termed as a double-stage membrane reformer (DSMR), functioning as a standalone H2 production and separation module, to effectively separate the unrecovered H2 from the retentate stream of the MR. The performance of the DSMR was optimized at different temperatures (573–673 K), pressures (100–300 kPaG), weight hourly space velocity (WHSV, 12.23 to 48.92 ), and varying membrane areas (65–495 cm2). The Cu-Fe/AZZ/SiC catalyst was tested in all three configurations for comparison including traditional reformer (TR), MR, and DSMR at 300 kPaG of pressure, 673 K of temperature, 3/1 of S/C ratio, 187 cm2 of membrane area, and 12.23 kgfeed h−1 kg−1catalyst of WHSV. Following the performance testing a higher methanol conversion is obtained in the case of DSMR. For instance, the methanol conversion of ∼75 % is achieved in the case of DSMR compared to ∼57 % in MR and ∼53 % in TR. Moreover, H2 recovery of more than 74.5 % is achieved in DSMR which is 8.5 % higher compared to MR. This is attributed to the enhanced hydrogen recovery in DSMR which helped to achieve higher methanol conversion according to the Le Chatelier's principle. This dual-stage configuration improved hydrogen separation and encouraged equilibrium shifting toward the desired product.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Energy Institute provides peer reviewed coverage of original high quality research on energy, engineering and technology.The coverage is broad and the main areas of interest include:
Combustion engineering and associated technologies; process heating; power generation; engines and propulsion; emissions and environmental pollution control; clean coal technologies; carbon abatement technologies
Emissions and environmental pollution control; safety and hazards;
Clean coal technologies; carbon abatement technologies, including carbon capture and storage, CCS;
Petroleum engineering and fuel quality, including storage and transport
Alternative energy sources; biomass utilisation and biomass conversion technologies; energy from waste, incineration and recycling
Energy conversion, energy recovery and energy efficiency; space heating, fuel cells, heat pumps and cooling systems
Energy storage
The journal''s coverage reflects changes in energy technology that result from the transition to more efficient energy production and end use together with reduced carbon emission.