Wiping the slate clean: A meta-analysis of post-detention aftercare programs for young offenders

IF 12.2 1区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL

Clinical Psychology Review Pub Date : 2025-08-13 DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102640

Rita Selimi , Jesse Roest , Geert Jan Stams , Tarah Hoebrechts , Esmee van de Graaf , Sanne Janssen , Marjolein Snijder , Njomza Llullaku , Peer van der Helm , Janneke Staaks , Naomi Koning , Mark Assink

{"title":"Wiping the slate clean: A meta-analysis of post-detention aftercare programs for young offenders","authors":"Rita Selimi , Jesse Roest , Geert Jan Stams , Tarah Hoebrechts , Esmee van de Graaf , Sanne Janssen , Marjolein Snijder , Njomza Llullaku , Peer van der Helm , Janneke Staaks , Naomi Koning , Mark Assink","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This three-level meta-analysis examined the effects of post-detention aftercare programs for adolescent and young adult offenders on several types of criminal recidivism (primary outcomes) and dynamic risk and protective factors for criminal behavior (secondary outcomes). A systematic search was conducted in the databases APA PsycInfo, Medline, ERIC, Web of Science Core Collection, SocINDEX, and Google Scholar, resulting in 26 relevant studies that produced 259 effect sizes. The results revealed a small overall effect (<em>g</em> = 0.26). Aftercare was effective for both primary (<em>g</em> = 0.23) and secondary (<em>g</em> = 0.35) outcomes. Smaller effects were found for general offenses (<em>g =</em> 0.23) and violent offenses (<em>g =</em> 0.26), a somewhat larger effect for minor offenses (<em>g =</em> 0.39), and no effect for substance abuse offenses (<em>g =</em> −0.04). Larger effects were found for arrests (<em>g =</em> 0.25) compared to convicted offenses (<em>g =</em> 0.12). Moderator analyses showed that mentoring and multi-modal interventions were effective, whereas family interventions as well as service and surveillance interventions were not effective. Positive changes in skills, substance abuse, family functioning, externalizing problems, internalizing problems, and general health were associated with larger intervention effects on recidivism, and thus may be considered important levers of change in post-detention aftercare programs. It was concluded that aftercare programs can fulfill a crucial role in deterring youth from re-offending. Future research should focus on refining aftercare programs and identifying program components that contribute to the success of aftercare for young offenders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 102640"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735825001072","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This three-level meta-analysis examined the effects of post-detention aftercare programs for adolescent and young adult offenders on several types of criminal recidivism (primary outcomes) and dynamic risk and protective factors for criminal behavior (secondary outcomes). A systematic search was conducted in the databases APA PsycInfo, Medline, ERIC, Web of Science Core Collection, SocINDEX, and Google Scholar, resulting in 26 relevant studies that produced 259 effect sizes. The results revealed a small overall effect (g = 0.26). Aftercare was effective for both primary (g = 0.23) and secondary (g = 0.35) outcomes. Smaller effects were found for general offenses (g = 0.23) and violent offenses (g = 0.26), a somewhat larger effect for minor offenses (g = 0.39), and no effect for substance abuse offenses (g = −0.04). Larger effects were found for arrests (g = 0.25) compared to convicted offenses (g = 0.12). Moderator analyses showed that mentoring and multi-modal interventions were effective, whereas family interventions as well as service and surveillance interventions were not effective. Positive changes in skills, substance abuse, family functioning, externalizing problems, internalizing problems, and general health were associated with larger intervention effects on recidivism, and thus may be considered important levers of change in post-detention aftercare programs. It was concluded that aftercare programs can fulfill a crucial role in deterring youth from re-offending. Future research should focus on refining aftercare programs and identifying program components that contribute to the success of aftercare for young offenders.

查看原文本刊更多论文

洗心革面：对少年犯拘留后善后项目的荟萃分析

这个三层次的荟萃分析考察了青少年和青年罪犯的拘留后善后项目对几种类型的犯罪再犯（主要结果）和犯罪行为的动态风险和保护因素（次要结果）的影响。在APA PsycInfo、Medline、ERIC、Web of Science Core Collection、SocINDEX和谷歌Scholar等数据库中进行了系统搜索，得到了26项相关研究，产生了259个效应量。结果显示总体效应较小（g = 0.26）。术后护理对主要结局（g = 0.23）和次要结局（g = 0.35）均有效。一般犯罪（g = 0.23）和暴力犯罪（g = 0.26）的影响较小，轻微犯罪（g = 0.39）的影响稍大，滥用药物犯罪（g = - 0.04）没有影响。逮捕（g = 0.25）比定罪（g = 0.12）的影响更大。调节分析表明，指导和多模式干预是有效的，而家庭干预以及服务和监督干预则无效。技能、药物滥用、家庭功能、外化问题、内化问题和一般健康方面的积极变化与对累犯的更大干预效果有关，因此可能被认为是拘留后护理项目中改变的重要杠杆。结论是，善后项目在阻止青少年再次犯罪方面起着至关重要的作用。未来的研究应集中于完善善后护理方案，并确定有助于青少年罪犯善后护理成功的方案组成部分。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Clinical Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

23.10

自引率

1.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology. While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.