Assessing the impact of solder flux-induced corrosion on TOPCon solar cells

IF 6.3 2区 材料科学 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Jiexi Fu , Chandany Sen , Haoran Wang , Muhammad Umair Khan , Hao Song , Ruirui Lv , Ting Huang , Bram Hoex
{"title":"Assessing the impact of solder flux-induced corrosion on TOPCon solar cells","authors":"Jiexi Fu ,&nbsp;Chandany Sen ,&nbsp;Haoran Wang ,&nbsp;Muhammad Umair Khan ,&nbsp;Hao Song ,&nbsp;Ruirui Lv ,&nbsp;Ting Huang ,&nbsp;Bram Hoex","doi":"10.1016/j.solmat.2025.113890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>N-type tunnel oxide passivated contact (TOPCon) cells currently dominate the photovoltaic market. However, reliability issues remain, particularly in high-temperature and high-humidity environments, which can result in notable power losses. This study investigates the impact of two industrial fluxes on the reliability under damp heat (DH) conditions of n-type TOPCon solar cells referred to as Sample Group A, B, and C. Two industrially used soldering fluxes, designated as Flux A and Flux B, were applied to unencapsulated cells, followed by DH testing at 100 °C and 95 % relative humidity for 122 h or at 85 °C and 85 % relative humidity for 10 h. Sample A exhibit minimal corrosion regardless of flux type, attributed to their denser Ag structure and lower Al content, which reduced susceptibility to flux infiltration. In contrast, Sample B and C show significant degradation, particularly in the front exposure groups, with the sample C demonstrating severe delamination of the metal contacts. Flux A causes more pronounced corrosion than Flux B, likely due to its higher activator content, greater acid value, and the presence of halogens (undisclosed in the flux specifications). However, it should be noted that the corrosion by Flux B is still substantial. Cross-sectional and top-view analyses revealed extensive corrosion and the formation of Pb crystals, highlighting the corrosive effects of flux residues under DH conditions. The study emphasizes the value of unencapsulated cell-level testing as a rapid and cost-effective method to assess the adverse effects of soldering flux on cell technology, thereby supporting informed decision-making to ensure photovoltaic module reliability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":429,"journal":{"name":"Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells","volume":"294 ","pages":"Article 113890"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092702482500491X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

N-type tunnel oxide passivated contact (TOPCon) cells currently dominate the photovoltaic market. However, reliability issues remain, particularly in high-temperature and high-humidity environments, which can result in notable power losses. This study investigates the impact of two industrial fluxes on the reliability under damp heat (DH) conditions of n-type TOPCon solar cells referred to as Sample Group A, B, and C. Two industrially used soldering fluxes, designated as Flux A and Flux B, were applied to unencapsulated cells, followed by DH testing at 100 °C and 95 % relative humidity for 122 h or at 85 °C and 85 % relative humidity for 10 h. Sample A exhibit minimal corrosion regardless of flux type, attributed to their denser Ag structure and lower Al content, which reduced susceptibility to flux infiltration. In contrast, Sample B and C show significant degradation, particularly in the front exposure groups, with the sample C demonstrating severe delamination of the metal contacts. Flux A causes more pronounced corrosion than Flux B, likely due to its higher activator content, greater acid value, and the presence of halogens (undisclosed in the flux specifications). However, it should be noted that the corrosion by Flux B is still substantial. Cross-sectional and top-view analyses revealed extensive corrosion and the formation of Pb crystals, highlighting the corrosive effects of flux residues under DH conditions. The study emphasizes the value of unencapsulated cell-level testing as a rapid and cost-effective method to assess the adverse effects of soldering flux on cell technology, thereby supporting informed decision-making to ensure photovoltaic module reliability.
评估焊剂对TOPCon太阳能电池的腐蚀影响
n型隧道氧化物钝化接触(TOPCon)电池目前主导着光伏市场。然而,可靠性问题仍然存在,特别是在高温和高湿度环境中,这可能导致显著的功率损失。本研究调查的影响两个工业通量的可靠性在湿热(DH)条件下n型TOPCon太阳能电池被称为样本组,B和C两个工业用焊接通量,指定为通量和通量B,被应用于未密封的细胞,其次是DH测试在100°C和95%相对湿度为122 h或85°C和85%相对湿度10 h。样品表现出最小腐蚀不管流量类型,这是由于它们的Ag结构更致密,Al含量更低,从而降低了对通量渗透的敏感性。相比之下,样品B和C表现出明显的降解,特别是在正面暴露组,样品C表现出严重的金属触点分层。焊剂A比焊剂B引起更明显的腐蚀,可能是由于其较高的活化剂含量、较大的酸值和卤素的存在(在焊剂规范中未披露)。然而,应该注意的是,熔剂B的腐蚀仍然很大。横断面和俯视图分析显示了广泛的腐蚀和Pb晶体的形成,突出了在DH条件下熔剂残留物的腐蚀作用。该研究强调了非封装电池级测试的价值,作为一种快速、经济的方法来评估焊剂对电池技术的不利影响,从而支持明智的决策,以确保光伏组件的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells
Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
11.60%
发文量
513
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells is intended as a vehicle for the dissemination of research results on materials science and technology related to photovoltaic, photothermal and photoelectrochemical solar energy conversion. Materials science is taken in the broadest possible sense and encompasses physics, chemistry, optics, materials fabrication and analysis for all types of materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信