Evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy of CRISPR-based tuberculosis diagnostics, GeneXpert MTB/RIF, and innowave DX MTB/RIF across diverse tuberculosis patient populations
Xike Zhou , Yan Peng , Mohan Huang , Tian He , Junjie Lu , Hao Pei , Fang Wang
{"title":"Evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy of CRISPR-based tuberculosis diagnostics, GeneXpert MTB/RIF, and innowave DX MTB/RIF across diverse tuberculosis patient populations","authors":"Xike Zhou , Yan Peng , Mohan Huang , Tian He , Junjie Lu , Hao Pei , Fang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2025.117059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats)-based tuberculosis (TB) diagnostics, GeneXpert MTB/RIF, and Innowave DX MTB/RIF assays across diverse tuberculosis patient populations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A case-control study was conducted on hospitalized patients with suspected tuberculosis from June 2023 to September 2023. The study population was stratified by age, gender, and comorbidity status. Participants underwent testing with CRISPR-based diagnostics, GeneXpert MTB/RIF, and Innowave DX MTB/RIF assays. Mycobacterial culture served as the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, false positive rate, and false negative rate were calculated for each test across strata. Diagnostic performance was compared using Chi-square tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our study included 187 patients, with 114 testing positive for TB. CRISPR diagnostics exhibited the highest sensitivity (0.660) across all tests, while GeneXpert MTB/RIF demonstrated perfect specificity (0.986). Innowave DX MTB/RIF assays showed sensitivity and specificity of 0.576 and 0.984. Notably, CRISPR diagnostics outperformed other tests in accuracy (0.798) among elderly patients, while maintaining robust diagnostic efficacy across gender and comorbidity groups. Statistical analysis indicated no significant differences in sensitivity and specificity among age groups (all <em>P</em> > 0.8), nor any significant effect of gender or comorbid conditions on diagnostic performance (all <em>P</em> > 0.7).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CRISPR-based diagnostics, GeneXpert MTB/RIF, and Innowave DX MTB/RIF assays demonstrate high diagnostic utility across diverse TB patient populations. CRISPR diagnostics show promising sensitivity and accuracy, suggesting significant potential for TB diagnosis. Their performance remains consistent regardless of age, gender, or comorbidities, supporting broad clinical applicability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11329,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease","volume":"113 4","pages":"Article 117059"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732889325003827","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats)-based tuberculosis (TB) diagnostics, GeneXpert MTB/RIF, and Innowave DX MTB/RIF assays across diverse tuberculosis patient populations.
Methods
A case-control study was conducted on hospitalized patients with suspected tuberculosis from June 2023 to September 2023. The study population was stratified by age, gender, and comorbidity status. Participants underwent testing with CRISPR-based diagnostics, GeneXpert MTB/RIF, and Innowave DX MTB/RIF assays. Mycobacterial culture served as the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, false positive rate, and false negative rate were calculated for each test across strata. Diagnostic performance was compared using Chi-square tests.
Results
Our study included 187 patients, with 114 testing positive for TB. CRISPR diagnostics exhibited the highest sensitivity (0.660) across all tests, while GeneXpert MTB/RIF demonstrated perfect specificity (0.986). Innowave DX MTB/RIF assays showed sensitivity and specificity of 0.576 and 0.984. Notably, CRISPR diagnostics outperformed other tests in accuracy (0.798) among elderly patients, while maintaining robust diagnostic efficacy across gender and comorbidity groups. Statistical analysis indicated no significant differences in sensitivity and specificity among age groups (all P > 0.8), nor any significant effect of gender or comorbid conditions on diagnostic performance (all P > 0.7).
Conclusion
CRISPR-based diagnostics, GeneXpert MTB/RIF, and Innowave DX MTB/RIF assays demonstrate high diagnostic utility across diverse TB patient populations. CRISPR diagnostics show promising sensitivity and accuracy, suggesting significant potential for TB diagnosis. Their performance remains consistent regardless of age, gender, or comorbidities, supporting broad clinical applicability.
期刊介绍:
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease keeps you informed of the latest developments in clinical microbiology and the diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases. Packed with rigorously peer-reviewed articles and studies in bacteriology, immunology, immunoserology, infectious diseases, mycology, parasitology, and virology, the journal examines new procedures, unusual cases, controversial issues, and important new literature. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease distinguished independent editorial board, consisting of experts from many medical specialties, ensures you extensive and authoritative coverage.