Are resin sealants effective to treat caries lesions in the outer 1/3 of dentin compared to composite resin restorations? Systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 8.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Japanese Dental Science Review Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jdsr.2025.07.002
Larissa Yumi Ito, Letícia Simeoni Avais, Elis Carolina Pacheco, Leticia Maira Wambier, Alexandra Mara de Paula, Taíse Alessandra Hanzen, Alessandra Reis, Denise Stadler Wambier, Ana Cláudia Rodrigues Chibinski
{"title":"Are resin sealants effective to treat caries lesions in the outer 1/3 of dentin compared to composite resin restorations? Systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Larissa Yumi Ito,&nbsp;Letícia Simeoni Avais,&nbsp;Elis Carolina Pacheco,&nbsp;Leticia Maira Wambier,&nbsp;Alexandra Mara de Paula,&nbsp;Taíse Alessandra Hanzen,&nbsp;Alessandra Reis,&nbsp;Denise Stadler Wambier,&nbsp;Ana Cláudia Rodrigues Chibinski","doi":"10.1016/j.jdsr.2025.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This systematic review analyzed effectiveness of resin sealants in arresting caries lesions in the outer 1/3 of dentin compared to restorations in deciduous/permanent teeth. Seven databases were searched for randomized clinical trials (December/2024), considering the outcomes “caries progression”, “material retention”, “tertiary dentin formation”, with a minimum 6 months follow-up. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2; meta-analysis used risk difference as effect measure in random effects model and Cochran Q test / I<sup>2</sup> statistics for heterogeneity; GRADE assessed the evidence certainty. From 6251, 6 papers addressing deciduous (3 high; 3 low risk of bias) and 3 permanent teeth (1 high; 2 low) were included. In deciduous teeth, difference wasn’t observed for “caries progression” [0.02 (-0.04–0.08; p = 0.54); I<sup>2</sup>= 0 % (p = 0.79)] or “material retention” [0.09 (-0.01–0.19); I<sup>2</sup>= 35 % (p = 0.18)]. In permanent teeth, there was no difference for “caries progression” [-0.01 (-0.08–0.06); I<sup>2</sup> = 30 % (p = 0.23)] and “tertiary dentin” [0.04 (-0.00–0.09); I<sup>2</sup> = 0 % (p = 0.51)]; “material retention” favored restorations after 48 months [0.08 (0.04–0.12); I<sup>2</sup> = 0 % (p = 0.34)]. In conclusion, sealants can be used to treat initial dentin caries lesions in deciduous and permanent teeth; however, the certainty of the evidence is low and moderate, respectively, and the findings must be taken carefully.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51334,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Dental Science Review","volume":"61 ","pages":"Pages 200-212"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Dental Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1882761625000146","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review analyzed effectiveness of resin sealants in arresting caries lesions in the outer 1/3 of dentin compared to restorations in deciduous/permanent teeth. Seven databases were searched for randomized clinical trials (December/2024), considering the outcomes “caries progression”, “material retention”, “tertiary dentin formation”, with a minimum 6 months follow-up. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2; meta-analysis used risk difference as effect measure in random effects model and Cochran Q test / I2 statistics for heterogeneity; GRADE assessed the evidence certainty. From 6251, 6 papers addressing deciduous (3 high; 3 low risk of bias) and 3 permanent teeth (1 high; 2 low) were included. In deciduous teeth, difference wasn’t observed for “caries progression” [0.02 (-0.04–0.08; p = 0.54); I2= 0 % (p = 0.79)] or “material retention” [0.09 (-0.01–0.19); I2= 35 % (p = 0.18)]. In permanent teeth, there was no difference for “caries progression” [-0.01 (-0.08–0.06); I2 = 30 % (p = 0.23)] and “tertiary dentin” [0.04 (-0.00–0.09); I2 = 0 % (p = 0.51)]; “material retention” favored restorations after 48 months [0.08 (0.04–0.12); I2 = 0 % (p = 0.34)]. In conclusion, sealants can be used to treat initial dentin caries lesions in deciduous and permanent teeth; however, the certainty of the evidence is low and moderate, respectively, and the findings must be taken carefully.
与复合树脂修复体相比,树脂密封剂对治疗牙本质外1/3的龋齿是否有效?系统回顾和荟萃分析
本系统综述分析了树脂密封剂与乳牙/恒牙修复体相比在阻止牙本质外1/3龋损方面的有效性。检索7个随机临床试验数据库(2024年12月),考虑结果“龋齿进展”、“材料保留”、“三级牙本质形成”,随访至少6个月。偏倚风险评估采用RoB 2;meta分析随机效应模型采用风险差异作为效应测度,异质性采用Cochran Q检验/ I2统计量;GRADE评估证据的确定性。从6251起,6篇论文论及落叶(3篇高;3个低偏倚风险)和3个恒牙(1个高偏倚风险;2低)被纳入。乳牙的“龋齿进展”差异无统计学意义[0.02 (-0.04-0.08; = 0.54页);I2 = 0 % (p = 0.79)]或“材料保留”[0.09 (-0.01 - -0.19);I2 = 35 % (p = 0.18)]。在恒牙方面,两组龋病进展情况无显著差异[-0.01 (-0.08-0.06);I2 = 30 % (p = 0.23)]和“三级牙质”[0.04 (-0.00 - -0.09);I2 = 0 % (p = 0.51)];48个月后,“材料固位”有利于修复体[0.08 (0.04-0.12);I2 = 0 % (p = 0.34)]。综上所述,封闭剂可用于治疗乳牙和恒牙的初始牙本质龋病;然而,证据的确定性分别为低和中等,必须仔细对待这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Japanese Dental Science Review
Japanese Dental Science Review DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
1.50%
发文量
31
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The Japanese Dental Science Review is published by the Japanese Association for Dental Science aiming to introduce the modern aspects of the dental basic and clinical sciences in Japan, and to share and discuss the update information with foreign researchers and dentists for further development of dentistry. In principle, papers are written and submitted on the invitation of one of the Editors, although the Editors would be glad to receive suggestions. Proposals for review articles should be sent by the authors to one of the Editors by e-mail. All submitted papers are subject to the peer- refereeing process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书