Kyle L. Ondar, Eugene Ablordeppey, Philip J. Brown, Fang-Chi Hsu, Joel D. Stitzel, F. Scott Gayzik
{"title":"Biomechanical characterization of porcine skin under focal compressive loading with varied edge radii","authors":"Kyle L. Ondar, Eugene Ablordeppey, Philip J. Brown, Fang-Chi Hsu, Joel D. Stitzel, F. Scott Gayzik","doi":"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.107163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is a lack of scientific literature on the biomechanics of skin injury under focal compressive loading at various edge radii. It is understood that interactions with very small edge radii produce laceration, but as edge radii increase, the injury mechanism transitions to focal compression, and the behavior of the dermis and epidermis is not well characterized. This study quantifies effects of penetration depth and contact area of blunt, rigid hemispherical edges on loading and subsequent skin injury. A total of 172 fresh porcine skin samples were tested under normal loading using five end effectors (radii ranging from 0.2 to 2 mm) and four depths of compression (75 %, 85 %, 90 %, 95 %). Injury was defined as disruption of the epidermis and dermis exceeding 33 % of sample thickness, analyzed via digital histological methods. Results showed a clear increasing linear trend in line load (N/mm) and histological depth by radius with specimen compression. Findings suggest that tissue rupture, and thus injury, is likely a strain-based event that initiates at greater than 75 % compression. Injury was not detected at 75 % compression for any end effector but became more frequent at 85 % compression and above. No clear stratification of injury data was observed by end effector, even though local stresses increased with decreasing radius. An injury risk curve based on a Weibull fit indicates that a line load of 72 N/mm yields a 5 % risk of injury, while a line load of 200 N/mm results in a 50 % risk of injury under focal compressive loading.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 107163"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616125002796","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There is a lack of scientific literature on the biomechanics of skin injury under focal compressive loading at various edge radii. It is understood that interactions with very small edge radii produce laceration, but as edge radii increase, the injury mechanism transitions to focal compression, and the behavior of the dermis and epidermis is not well characterized. This study quantifies effects of penetration depth and contact area of blunt, rigid hemispherical edges on loading and subsequent skin injury. A total of 172 fresh porcine skin samples were tested under normal loading using five end effectors (radii ranging from 0.2 to 2 mm) and four depths of compression (75 %, 85 %, 90 %, 95 %). Injury was defined as disruption of the epidermis and dermis exceeding 33 % of sample thickness, analyzed via digital histological methods. Results showed a clear increasing linear trend in line load (N/mm) and histological depth by radius with specimen compression. Findings suggest that tissue rupture, and thus injury, is likely a strain-based event that initiates at greater than 75 % compression. Injury was not detected at 75 % compression for any end effector but became more frequent at 85 % compression and above. No clear stratification of injury data was observed by end effector, even though local stresses increased with decreasing radius. An injury risk curve based on a Weibull fit indicates that a line load of 72 N/mm yields a 5 % risk of injury, while a line load of 200 N/mm results in a 50 % risk of injury under focal compressive loading.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials is concerned with the mechanical deformation, damage and failure under applied forces, of biological material (at the tissue, cellular and molecular levels) and of biomaterials, i.e. those materials which are designed to mimic or replace biological materials.
The primary focus of the journal is the synthesis of materials science, biology, and medical and dental science. Reports of fundamental scientific investigations are welcome, as are articles concerned with the practical application of materials in medical devices. Both experimental and theoretical work is of interest; theoretical papers will normally include comparison of predictions with experimental data, though we recognize that this may not always be appropriate. The journal also publishes technical notes concerned with emerging experimental or theoretical techniques, letters to the editor and, by invitation, review articles and papers describing existing techniques for the benefit of an interdisciplinary readership.