Blood phosphorylated tau for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Joseph Therriault, Wagner S Brum, Lydia Trudel, Arthur C Macedo, Fernando Valentim Bitencourt, Carolina Castro Martins-Pfeifer, Martin Nakouzi, Ilaria Pola, Matthew Wong, Przemysław R Kac, Ana Paula Real, Chloë Witherow, Thomas K Karikari, Alexis Moscoso, Eduardo R Zimmer, Michael Schöll, Tharick Pascoal, Andrea L Benedet, Nicholas J Ashton, Suzanne E Schindler, Pedro Rosa-Neto
{"title":"Blood phosphorylated tau for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Joseph Therriault, Wagner S Brum, Lydia Trudel, Arthur C Macedo, Fernando Valentim Bitencourt, Carolina Castro Martins-Pfeifer, Martin Nakouzi, Ilaria Pola, Matthew Wong, Przemysław R Kac, Ana Paula Real, Chloë Witherow, Thomas K Karikari, Alexis Moscoso, Eduardo R Zimmer, Michael Schöll, Tharick Pascoal, Andrea L Benedet, Nicholas J Ashton, Suzanne E Schindler, Pedro Rosa-Neto","doi":"10.1016/s1474-4422(25)00227-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>Plasma phosphorylated tau (p-tau) biomarkers show promise to transform the clinical management of Alzheimer's disease by providing more accessible and cost-effective diagnostic tools. p-tau biomarkers have emerged as leading contenders for clinical implementation; however, there have been no comprehensive meta-analyses of their diagnostic performance. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of plasma p-tau biomarkers and individual p-tau assays to identify biologically defined Alzheimer's disease.<h3>Methods</h3>For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles published from July 1, 1984 up to Dec 9, 2024, that reported on the discriminative accuracy of plasma p-tau biomarkers for amyloid-PET, tau-PET, CSF, and neuropathological reference standards. We included cohort, case-control, cross-sectional, and randomised controlled studies that recruited adults from any setting. Articles were excluded if they did not contain data on a p-tau blood biomarker, did not contain an appropriate biological reference standard, did not report diagnostic accuracy data, included participants younger than 18 years, or reported duplicate or overlapping data from another publication. Summary data were independently extracted by eight authors. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. The primary outcome was the diagnostic performance of plasma p-tau biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease. We used a bivariate random-effects meta-analysis to estimate pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostics odds ratio and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. We assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE. This study was done following PRISMA-DTA guidelines and is registered with PROSPERO as CRD42023422143.<h3>Findings</h3>Of the 6429 studies identified by our search, 312 studies were assessed for eligibility, with 113 studies included in the final analysis, comprising 29 625 unique individuals. Plasma p-tau217 was the highest-performing biomarker for identifying biologically defined Alzheimer's disease, with pooled sensitivity of 88·1% (95% CI 86·7–89·5, moderate certainty of evidence), specificity of 88·7% (87·4–89·9, moderate certainty of evidence), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 91·1% (88·9–92·4, moderate certainty of evidence), and diagnostic odds ratio of 50·7 (40·6–63·4). p-tau181 pooled sensitivity was 80·5% (78·4–82·4, low certainty of evidence), specificity was 76·4% (74·1–78·6, low certainty of evidence), AUROC was 81·5% (80·2–82·9, low certainty of evidence), and diagnostic odds ratio was 13·4 (11·4–16·7). p-tau205 pooled sensitivity was 76·6% (70·7–81·6, moderate certainty of evidence), specificity was 86·0% (78·6–91·2, moderate certainty of evidence), AUROC was 85·1% (80·7–89·6, moderate certainty of evidence), and diagnostic odds ratio was 20·2 (10·5–38·7). p-tau212 pooled sensitivity was 84·5% (75·5–90·6, moderate certainty of evidence), specificity was 87·3% (79·5–92·5, moderate certainty of evidence), AUROC was 90·3% (86·6–94·1, moderate certainty of evidence), and diagnostic odds ratio was 41·2 (22·0–77·3). p-tau231 pooled sensitivity was 75·2% (71·3–78·8, moderate certainty of evidence), specificity was 75·3% (71·2–78·9, moderate certainty of evidence), AUROC was 80·2 (77·6–82·7, moderate certainty of evidence), and diagnostic odds ratio was 9·3 (7·0–12·2). Approximately 90% of studies were rated as high risk of bias for not having used predefined or externally derived thresholds.<h3>Interpretation</h3>Plasma p-tau217 is a highly sensitive and specific biomarker for Alzheimer's disease pathology, despite the high risk of bias of many studies. Prospective clinical implementation studies in real-world settings are needed to characterise the effect of plasma p-tau217 on Alzheimer's disease diagnosis and clinical management.<h3>Funding</h3>McGill Faculty of Medicine Fellowship.","PeriodicalId":22676,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Neurology","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(25)00227-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Plasma phosphorylated tau (p-tau) biomarkers show promise to transform the clinical management of Alzheimer's disease by providing more accessible and cost-effective diagnostic tools. p-tau biomarkers have emerged as leading contenders for clinical implementation; however, there have been no comprehensive meta-analyses of their diagnostic performance. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of plasma p-tau biomarkers and individual p-tau assays to identify biologically defined Alzheimer's disease.

Methods

For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles published from July 1, 1984 up to Dec 9, 2024, that reported on the discriminative accuracy of plasma p-tau biomarkers for amyloid-PET, tau-PET, CSF, and neuropathological reference standards. We included cohort, case-control, cross-sectional, and randomised controlled studies that recruited adults from any setting. Articles were excluded if they did not contain data on a p-tau blood biomarker, did not contain an appropriate biological reference standard, did not report diagnostic accuracy data, included participants younger than 18 years, or reported duplicate or overlapping data from another publication. Summary data were independently extracted by eight authors. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. The primary outcome was the diagnostic performance of plasma p-tau biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease. We used a bivariate random-effects meta-analysis to estimate pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostics odds ratio and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. We assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE. This study was done following PRISMA-DTA guidelines and is registered with PROSPERO as CRD42023422143.

Findings

Of the 6429 studies identified by our search, 312 studies were assessed for eligibility, with 113 studies included in the final analysis, comprising 29 625 unique individuals. Plasma p-tau217 was the highest-performing biomarker for identifying biologically defined Alzheimer's disease, with pooled sensitivity of 88·1% (95% CI 86·7–89·5, moderate certainty of evidence), specificity of 88·7% (87·4–89·9, moderate certainty of evidence), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 91·1% (88·9–92·4, moderate certainty of evidence), and diagnostic odds ratio of 50·7 (40·6–63·4). p-tau181 pooled sensitivity was 80·5% (78·4–82·4, low certainty of evidence), specificity was 76·4% (74·1–78·6, low certainty of evidence), AUROC was 81·5% (80·2–82·9, low certainty of evidence), and diagnostic odds ratio was 13·4 (11·4–16·7). p-tau205 pooled sensitivity was 76·6% (70·7–81·6, moderate certainty of evidence), specificity was 86·0% (78·6–91·2, moderate certainty of evidence), AUROC was 85·1% (80·7–89·6, moderate certainty of evidence), and diagnostic odds ratio was 20·2 (10·5–38·7). p-tau212 pooled sensitivity was 84·5% (75·5–90·6, moderate certainty of evidence), specificity was 87·3% (79·5–92·5, moderate certainty of evidence), AUROC was 90·3% (86·6–94·1, moderate certainty of evidence), and diagnostic odds ratio was 41·2 (22·0–77·3). p-tau231 pooled sensitivity was 75·2% (71·3–78·8, moderate certainty of evidence), specificity was 75·3% (71·2–78·9, moderate certainty of evidence), AUROC was 80·2 (77·6–82·7, moderate certainty of evidence), and diagnostic odds ratio was 9·3 (7·0–12·2). Approximately 90% of studies were rated as high risk of bias for not having used predefined or externally derived thresholds.

Interpretation

Plasma p-tau217 is a highly sensitive and specific biomarker for Alzheimer's disease pathology, despite the high risk of bias of many studies. Prospective clinical implementation studies in real-world settings are needed to characterise the effect of plasma p-tau217 on Alzheimer's disease diagnosis and clinical management.

Funding

McGill Faculty of Medicine Fellowship.
血液磷酸化tau蛋白对阿尔茨海默病的诊断:系统回顾和荟萃分析
血浆磷酸化tau (p-tau)生物标志物有望通过提供更容易获得和更具成本效益的诊断工具来改变阿尔茨海默病的临床管理。P-tau生物标志物已成为临床应用的主要竞争者;然而,目前还没有对其诊断性能进行全面的荟萃分析。我们的目的是评估血浆p-tau生物标志物和个体p-tau测定的诊断性能,以确定生物学上定义的阿尔茨海默病。方法:在这项系统评价和荟萃分析中,我们检索了Embase、MEDLINE、PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science从1984年7月1日至2024年12月9日发表的文章,这些文章报道了血浆p-tau生物标志物对淀粉样蛋白pet、tau-PET、脑脊液和神经病理参考标准的鉴别准确性。我们纳入了从任何环境中招募成人的队列、病例对照、横断面和随机对照研究。如果文章不包含p-tau血液生物标志物的数据,不包含适当的生物参考标准,未报告诊断准确性数据,包括年龄小于18岁的受试者,或报告了来自其他出版物的重复或重叠数据,则将其排除。汇总数据由8位作者独立提取。使用QUADAS-2评估偏倚风险。主要结果是血浆p-tau生物标志物对阿尔茨海默病的诊断性能。我们使用双变量随机效应荟萃分析来估计合并敏感性、特异性、诊断优势比和受试者工作特征曲线下的面积。我们使用GRADE评估证据的确定性。本研究遵循PRISMA-DTA指南进行,并在PROSPERO注册为CRD42023422143。在我们的检索确定的6429项研究中,312项研究被评估为合格,其中113项研究纳入最终分析,包括29625个独特个体。血浆p-tau217是识别生物学上定义的阿尔茨海默病的最佳生物标志物,其总敏感性为88.1% (95% CI为86.7 - 89.5,证据的中等确定性),特异性为88.7%(84.7 - 89.9,证据的中等确定性),受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)为91.1%(88.9 - 92.4,证据的中等确定性),诊断优势比为50.7(40.6 - 63.4)。p-tau181合并敏感性为88.5%(78.4 ~ 88.4,证据确定性低),特异性为76.4%(74.1 ~ 78.6,证据确定性低),AUROC为81.5%(88.2 ~ 88.9,证据确定性低),诊断优势比为13.4(11.4 ~ 16.7)。p-tau205合并敏感性为76.6%(70.7 - 86.1,证据的中等确定性),特异性为86.0%(78.6 - 91.2,证据的中等确定性),AUROC为85.1%(80.7 - 89.6,证据的中等确定性),诊断优势比为20.2(10.5 - 38.7)。p-tau212合并敏感性为84.5%(75.5 - 90.6,证据可信度中等),特异性为86.7%(79.5 - 92.5,证据可信度中等),AUROC为91.3%(86.6 - 94.1,证据可信度中等),诊断优势比为41.2(22.0 - 77.3)。p-tau231合并敏感性为75.2%(73.1 ~ 78.8,证据确定性中等),特异性为75.3%(71.2 ~ 78.9,证据确定性中等),AUROC为802(77.6 ~ 82.7,证据确定性中等),诊断优势比为9.3(7.0 ~ 12.2)。约90%的研究因未使用预定义阈值或外部衍生阈值而被评为高风险偏倚。血浆p-tau217是一种高度敏感和特异性的阿尔茨海默病病理生物标志物,尽管许多研究存在高偏倚风险。需要在现实环境中进行前瞻性临床实施研究,以表征血浆p-tau217对阿尔茨海默病诊断和临床管理的影响。麦吉尔医学院奖学金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信