A meta inspiral–merger–ringdown consistency test of general relativity with gravitational wave signals from compact binaries

IF 3.7 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Sakshi Satish Madekar, Nathan K Johnson-McDaniel, Anuradha Gupta and Abhirup Ghosh
{"title":"A meta inspiral–merger–ringdown consistency test of general relativity with gravitational wave signals from compact binaries","authors":"Sakshi Satish Madekar, Nathan K Johnson-McDaniel, Anuradha Gupta and Abhirup Ghosh","doi":"10.1088/1361-6382/adf02a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The observation of gravitational waves from compact binary coalescences is a promising tool to test the validity of general relativity (GR) in a highly dynamical strong-field regime. There are now a variety of tests of GR performed on the observed compact binary signals. In this paper, we propose a new test of GR that compares the results of these individual tests. This meta inspiral–merger–ringdown consistency test (IMRCT) involves inferring the final mass and spin of the remnant black hole obtained from the analyses of two different tests of GR and checking for consistency. If there is a deviation from GR, we expect that different tests of GR will recover different values for the final mass and spin, in general. We check the performance of the meta IMRCT using a standard set of null tests used in various gravitational-wave analyses: the original IMRCT, the test infrastructure for GR, the flexible-theory-independent test, and the modified dispersion test. However, the meta IMRCT is applicable to any tests of GR that infer the initial masses and spins or the final mass and spin, including ones that are applied to binary neutron star or neutron star–black hole signals. We apply the meta IMRCT to simulated quasi-circular GR and non-GR binary black hole (BBH) signals as well as to eccentric BBH signals in GR (analysed with quasicircular waveforms). We find that the meta IMRCT gives consistency with GR for the quasi-circular GR signals and picks up a deviation from GR in the other cases, as do other tests. In some cases, the meta IMRCT finds a significant GR deviation for a given pair of tests (and specific testing parameters) while the individual tests do not, showing that it is more sensitive than the individual tests to certain types of deviations. In addition, we also apply this test to a few selected real compact binary signals and find them consistent with GR.","PeriodicalId":10282,"journal":{"name":"Classical and Quantum Gravity","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Classical and Quantum Gravity","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/adf02a","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The observation of gravitational waves from compact binary coalescences is a promising tool to test the validity of general relativity (GR) in a highly dynamical strong-field regime. There are now a variety of tests of GR performed on the observed compact binary signals. In this paper, we propose a new test of GR that compares the results of these individual tests. This meta inspiral–merger–ringdown consistency test (IMRCT) involves inferring the final mass and spin of the remnant black hole obtained from the analyses of two different tests of GR and checking for consistency. If there is a deviation from GR, we expect that different tests of GR will recover different values for the final mass and spin, in general. We check the performance of the meta IMRCT using a standard set of null tests used in various gravitational-wave analyses: the original IMRCT, the test infrastructure for GR, the flexible-theory-independent test, and the modified dispersion test. However, the meta IMRCT is applicable to any tests of GR that infer the initial masses and spins or the final mass and spin, including ones that are applied to binary neutron star or neutron star–black hole signals. We apply the meta IMRCT to simulated quasi-circular GR and non-GR binary black hole (BBH) signals as well as to eccentric BBH signals in GR (analysed with quasicircular waveforms). We find that the meta IMRCT gives consistency with GR for the quasi-circular GR signals and picks up a deviation from GR in the other cases, as do other tests. In some cases, the meta IMRCT finds a significant GR deviation for a given pair of tests (and specific testing parameters) while the individual tests do not, showing that it is more sensitive than the individual tests to certain types of deviations. In addition, we also apply this test to a few selected real compact binary signals and find them consistent with GR.
广义相对论与紧致双星引力波信号的元启发-合并-环衰一致性检验
从紧致二元凝聚中观测引力波是一种很有前途的工具,可以在高动态强场环境中检验广义相对论(GR)的有效性。现在对观测到的紧二进制信号进行了各种各样的GR测试。在本文中,我们提出了一个新的GR测试,它比较了这些单独测试的结果。这种元吸入-合并-环衰一致性测试(IMRCT)涉及推断从两种不同的GR测试分析中获得的残余黑洞的最终质量和自旋,并检查一致性。如果与GR存在偏差,我们预计不同的GR测试通常会得到不同的最终质量和自旋值。我们使用一组用于各种引力波分析的标准零测试来检查元IMRCT的性能:原始IMRCT、GR测试基础设施、灵活理论无关测试和改进的色散测试。然而,元IMRCT适用于任何推断初始质量和自旋或最终质量和自旋的GR测试,包括应用于双中子星或中子星-黑洞信号的测试。我们将meta IMRCT应用于模拟准圆形GR和非GR双黑洞(BBH)信号,以及GR中的偏心BBH信号(用准圆形波形分析)。我们发现,对于准圆形GR信号,元IMRCT给出了与GR的一致性,并且在其他情况下与GR产生了偏差,其他测试也是如此。在某些情况下,元IMRCT发现了给定测试对(和特定测试参数)的显著GR偏差,而单个测试没有发现,这表明它比单个测试对某些类型的偏差更敏感。此外,我们还将该检验应用于一些选定的实紧二进制信号,发现它们符合GR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Classical and Quantum Gravity 物理-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.60%
发文量
301
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Classical and Quantum Gravity is an established journal for physicists, mathematicians and cosmologists in the fields of gravitation and the theory of spacetime. The journal is now the acknowledged world leader in classical relativity and all areas of quantum gravity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信