Comparison of Intrauterine Insemination Success Rates Using Donor Sperm Between Heterosexual and Female Couples: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 1.9
Andreia Gomes, Cristina Nogueira-Silva, Pedro Brandão
{"title":"Comparison of Intrauterine Insemination Success Rates Using Donor Sperm Between Heterosexual and Female Couples: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Andreia Gomes, Cristina Nogueira-Silva, Pedro Brandão","doi":"10.5935/1518-0557.20250021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the success rates of intrauterine insemination with donated sperm between heterosexual and female couples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study involving 519 women who underwent intrauterine insemination with donated sperm over a 5-year period. The sample included 193 women in heterosexual relationships and 326 women in female relationships. Participants were between 18 and 38 years old, undergoing their first reproductive treatment, and had no known female fertility disorders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found between the two groups in reproductive outcomes. Positive pregnancy test rates were 35.8% for heterosexual couples and 29.1% for female couples (p=0.12). Ongoing pregnancy rates were 31.6% and 27.3%, respectively (p=0.37). Live birth rates were 29.5% for heterosexual couples and 24.8% for female couples (p=0.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found no significant differences in intrauterine insemination with donated sperm outcomes between heterosexual and female couples. These findings suggest that the absence of seminal fluid exposure in female couples may not negatively impact reproductive success. However, the role of immune tolerance in assisted reproduction outcomes remains unclear. Further multicenter studies with larger samples are needed to explore the potential influence of seminal fluid and possible clinical interventions that may replicate its effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":520656,"journal":{"name":"JBRA assisted reproduction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBRA assisted reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20250021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the success rates of intrauterine insemination with donated sperm between heterosexual and female couples.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study involving 519 women who underwent intrauterine insemination with donated sperm over a 5-year period. The sample included 193 women in heterosexual relationships and 326 women in female relationships. Participants were between 18 and 38 years old, undergoing their first reproductive treatment, and had no known female fertility disorders.

Results: No significant differences were found between the two groups in reproductive outcomes. Positive pregnancy test rates were 35.8% for heterosexual couples and 29.1% for female couples (p=0.12). Ongoing pregnancy rates were 31.6% and 27.3%, respectively (p=0.37). Live birth rates were 29.5% for heterosexual couples and 24.8% for female couples (p=0.2).

Conclusions: This study found no significant differences in intrauterine insemination with donated sperm outcomes between heterosexual and female couples. These findings suggest that the absence of seminal fluid exposure in female couples may not negatively impact reproductive success. However, the role of immune tolerance in assisted reproduction outcomes remains unclear. Further multicenter studies with larger samples are needed to explore the potential influence of seminal fluid and possible clinical interventions that may replicate its effects.

异性夫妇和女性夫妇使用供体精子进行宫内人工授精成功率的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的:比较异性夫妇和女性夫妇捐献精子进行宫内人工授精的成功率。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,涉及519名妇女,她们在5年内接受了捐献精子的宫内人工授精。样本包括193名异性恋女性和326名女性。参与者年龄在18到38岁之间,正在接受第一次生殖治疗,并且没有已知的女性生育障碍。结果:两组患者生殖结果无显著差异。异性夫妇妊娠试验阳性率为35.8%,女性夫妇为29.1% (p=0.12)。持续妊娠率分别为31.6%和27.3% (p=0.37)。异性夫妇的活产率为29.5%,女性夫妇为24.8% (p=0.2)。结论:本研究发现异性夫妇和女性夫妇在捐赠精子的宫内人工授精结果上没有显著差异。这些发现表明,女性夫妇不接触精液可能不会对生殖成功产生负面影响。然而,免疫耐受在辅助生殖结果中的作用仍不清楚。进一步的多中心研究需要更大的样本来探索精液的潜在影响和可能复制其效果的临床干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信