Can we tell where our bodies end and the external world begins? Evidence for precise three-dimensional internal body models.

IF 3.5
Proceedings. Biological sciences Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-13 DOI:10.1098/rspb.2025.1255
Celia R Blaise, Holly C Clark, Hannes P Saal
{"title":"Can we tell where our bodies end and the external world begins? Evidence for precise three-dimensional internal body models.","authors":"Celia R Blaise, Holly C Clark, Hannes P Saal","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2025.1255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Distinguishing our body from the external world is crucial for self-perception and environmental interaction. Yet, the accuracy with which we perceive this boundary remains underexplored. Here, we developed a psychophysical protocol to assess how accurately individuals perceive their body boundaries. Participants were asked whether the midpoint between two tactile stimuli was inside or outside their perceived body boundary. Three-dimensional scans provided objective anatomical boundaries, allowing psychometric functions to be fitted. Results revealed remarkable overall precision, often within millimetres, in localizing body boundaries across multiple body regions. However, accuracy varied: while palm boundaries were localized nearly perfectly, stimuli along the wrist boundaries were frequently misjudged as extending beyond their true anatomical limit, revealing a systematic perceptual bias. Perceptual judgements adapted to changes in posture, but accuracy declined when the detailed local three-dimensional structure was omitted, indicating that proprioceptive cues are combined with detailed local body models. Finally, participants whose anatomy deviated from the average tended to align their responses with a typical body model rather than their unique physiology, suggesting that top-down processes influence boundary judgements. Our findings suggest that body boundary representation combines detailed three-dimensional body models with proprioceptive feedback into an integrated perceptual model of the anatomical body.</p>","PeriodicalId":520757,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. Biological sciences","volume":"292 2052","pages":"20251255"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12343127/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. Biological sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2025.1255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Distinguishing our body from the external world is crucial for self-perception and environmental interaction. Yet, the accuracy with which we perceive this boundary remains underexplored. Here, we developed a psychophysical protocol to assess how accurately individuals perceive their body boundaries. Participants were asked whether the midpoint between two tactile stimuli was inside or outside their perceived body boundary. Three-dimensional scans provided objective anatomical boundaries, allowing psychometric functions to be fitted. Results revealed remarkable overall precision, often within millimetres, in localizing body boundaries across multiple body regions. However, accuracy varied: while palm boundaries were localized nearly perfectly, stimuli along the wrist boundaries were frequently misjudged as extending beyond their true anatomical limit, revealing a systematic perceptual bias. Perceptual judgements adapted to changes in posture, but accuracy declined when the detailed local three-dimensional structure was omitted, indicating that proprioceptive cues are combined with detailed local body models. Finally, participants whose anatomy deviated from the average tended to align their responses with a typical body model rather than their unique physiology, suggesting that top-down processes influence boundary judgements. Our findings suggest that body boundary representation combines detailed three-dimensional body models with proprioceptive feedback into an integrated perceptual model of the anatomical body.

我们能分辨出我们身体的终点和外部世界的起点吗?精确的三维人体内部模型的证据。
将我们的身体与外部世界区分开来对于自我感知和环境互动至关重要。然而,我们感知这一边界的准确性仍未得到充分探索。在这里,我们开发了一种心理物理协议来评估个人对身体边界的感知准确性。参与者被问及两个触觉刺激之间的中点是在他们感知到的身体边界内还是外。三维扫描提供了客观的解剖边界,使心理测量功能得以拟合。结果显示,在多个身体区域定位身体边界时,总体精度通常在毫米以内。然而,准确性各不相同:虽然手掌边界的定位几乎完美,但沿着手腕边界的刺激经常被误判为超出了其真正的解剖极限,这揭示了系统性的感知偏差。感知判断适应姿势的变化,但当局部详细的三维结构被省略时,准确性下降,这表明本体感觉线索与局部详细的身体模型相结合。最后,解剖结构偏离平均水平的参与者倾向于将他们的反应与典型的身体模型相一致,而不是他们独特的生理,这表明自上而下的过程影响了边界判断。我们的研究结果表明,身体边界表征结合了详细的三维身体模型和本体感觉反馈,形成了一个完整的解剖体感知模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信