{"title":"Incorporating ultrafiltration into Protein A membrane chromatography as a strategy to reduce elution volume and buffer consumption.","authors":"Gaoya Yuan, Meng Qu, Xudong Zhang, Yifeng Li","doi":"10.14440/jbm.2025.0109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Protein A chromatography is widely used for antibody purification. With conventional packed-bed columns, mass transfer within resin beads is diffusion-limited, entailing long residence time to achieve high binding capacities. Recently, several vendors have introduced Protein A membranes as alternatives to traditional Protein A resins/columns. These membranes feature open pore structures that facilitate the convective transport of protein molecules, enabling high binding capacities within significantly shorter residence time. The use of Protein A membranes can improve throughput, eliminate the need for column packing, and reduce cost. These advantages notwithstanding, Protein A membranes present certain drawbacks. A major limitation is their high dead volume-to-stationary phase ratio, which leads to larger elution volumes compared to their conventional counterparts. This results in significant eluate dilution and increased buffer consumption.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In the current study, we aimed to demonstrate that ultrafiltration (UF), when used in combination with Protein A membrane chromatography, can address these limitations by allowing eluate concentration and buffer reuse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A laboratory model of UF integrated Protein A membrane was set up to test the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed strategy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Integrated UF effectively concentrated Protein A membrane eluate to a concentration comparable to that of Protein A column eluate. In addition, reuse of pH-adjusted UF filtrate as elution buffer reduces buffer consumption by 50%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>UF integration is an effective solution for addressing the problem of increased elution volume and buffer consumption associated with Protein A membrane.</p>","PeriodicalId":73618,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biological methods","volume":"12 2","pages":"e99010050"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342231/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biological methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14440/jbm.2025.0109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Protein A chromatography is widely used for antibody purification. With conventional packed-bed columns, mass transfer within resin beads is diffusion-limited, entailing long residence time to achieve high binding capacities. Recently, several vendors have introduced Protein A membranes as alternatives to traditional Protein A resins/columns. These membranes feature open pore structures that facilitate the convective transport of protein molecules, enabling high binding capacities within significantly shorter residence time. The use of Protein A membranes can improve throughput, eliminate the need for column packing, and reduce cost. These advantages notwithstanding, Protein A membranes present certain drawbacks. A major limitation is their high dead volume-to-stationary phase ratio, which leads to larger elution volumes compared to their conventional counterparts. This results in significant eluate dilution and increased buffer consumption.
Objective: In the current study, we aimed to demonstrate that ultrafiltration (UF), when used in combination with Protein A membrane chromatography, can address these limitations by allowing eluate concentration and buffer reuse.
Methods: A laboratory model of UF integrated Protein A membrane was set up to test the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed strategy.
Results: Integrated UF effectively concentrated Protein A membrane eluate to a concentration comparable to that of Protein A column eluate. In addition, reuse of pH-adjusted UF filtrate as elution buffer reduces buffer consumption by 50%.
Conclusion: UF integration is an effective solution for addressing the problem of increased elution volume and buffer consumption associated with Protein A membrane.