Open-source platforms to investigate analytical flexibility in neuroimaging.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) Pub Date : 2025-07-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1162/IMAG.a.79
Jacob Sanz-Robinson, Michelle Wang, Brent McPherson, Yohan Chatelain, David Kennedy, Tristan Glatard, Jean-Baptiste Poline
{"title":"Open-source platforms to investigate analytical flexibility in neuroimaging.","authors":"Jacob Sanz-Robinson, Michelle Wang, Brent McPherson, Yohan Chatelain, David Kennedy, Tristan Glatard, Jean-Baptiste Poline","doi":"10.1162/IMAG.a.79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Researchers in brain imaging have access to a multitude of analysis tools, many of which carry out the same or similar tasks but yield different results when applied to the same data. This analytical flexibility often undermines reproducibility and raises concerns about the robustness of neuroimaging studies. However, the array of software packages to investigate and address analytical flexibility is decentralized, scattered, and not well documented. Consequently, researchers often lack the necessary information and protocols to buttress the reliability of their findings across analytical tools. This review catalogs and describes software platforms (i.e., software or computational libraries) that can be used to address result variability arising from computational pipelines and environments and explores the use of computing platforms and neuroimaging pipeline frameworks in addressing this issue. This study offers guidance to the research community on accessing, understanding, and utilizing these platforms to address brain imaging analytical flexibility. Additionally, the article provides specific recommendations tailored to different user groups, considering the tools they intend to use with these platforms and their computational constraints.</p>","PeriodicalId":73341,"journal":{"name":"Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)","volume":"3 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12330840/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/IMAG.a.79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Researchers in brain imaging have access to a multitude of analysis tools, many of which carry out the same or similar tasks but yield different results when applied to the same data. This analytical flexibility often undermines reproducibility and raises concerns about the robustness of neuroimaging studies. However, the array of software packages to investigate and address analytical flexibility is decentralized, scattered, and not well documented. Consequently, researchers often lack the necessary information and protocols to buttress the reliability of their findings across analytical tools. This review catalogs and describes software platforms (i.e., software or computational libraries) that can be used to address result variability arising from computational pipelines and environments and explores the use of computing platforms and neuroimaging pipeline frameworks in addressing this issue. This study offers guidance to the research community on accessing, understanding, and utilizing these platforms to address brain imaging analytical flexibility. Additionally, the article provides specific recommendations tailored to different user groups, considering the tools they intend to use with these platforms and their computational constraints.

研究神经成像分析灵活性的开源平台。
脑成像研究人员可以使用大量的分析工具,其中许多工具执行相同或类似的任务,但在应用于相同的数据时产生不同的结果。这种分析的灵活性往往会破坏再现性,并引起对神经影像学研究稳健性的担忧。然而,用于调查和处理分析灵活性的软件包是分散的、分散的,并且没有很好的文档化。因此,研究人员往往缺乏必要的信息和协议,以支持他们的发现的可靠性跨分析工具。这篇综述对软件平台(即软件或计算库)进行了分类和描述,这些软件平台可用于处理由计算管道和环境引起的结果可变性,并探讨了计算平台和神经成像管道框架在解决这一问题中的使用。本研究为研究界提供了获取、理解和利用这些平台来解决脑成像分析灵活性的指导。此外,考虑到不同用户组打算在这些平台上使用的工具及其计算限制,本文还提供了针对不同用户组的特定建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信