Anti-Queer Violence in Australia: An Intersectional Analysis of Victimization Among LGBTQA+ Adults.

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Matthew Mitchell, Joel Anderson, Natalie Amos, Adam Hill, Ruth McNair, Marina Carman, Adam Bourne
{"title":"Anti-Queer Violence in Australia: An Intersectional Analysis of Victimization Among LGBTQA+ Adults.","authors":"Matthew Mitchell, Joel Anderson, Natalie Amos, Adam Hill, Ruth McNair, Marina Carman, Adam Bourne","doi":"10.1080/00918369.2025.2530133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anti-queer violence is a significant criminological, public health, and social justice concern. While international research has shown that LGBTQA+ people generally experience higher rates of victimization compared to their heterosexual and cisgender peers, knowledge about these patterns in the Australian context remains limited. Moreover, most existing research focuses on overall rates of victimization, rather than on violence specifically related to sexual orientation or gender identity, and greater clarity is needed regarding the specific types of violence experienced, their relative frequencies, and how these differ across subgroups within the LGBTQA+ population. Analyzing self-report victimization data from the largest and most diverse sample of LGBTQA+ adults ever surveyed in Australia (<i>n</i> = 6,835), this article reveals that anti-queer violence remains a significant and persistent problem. Fifty-nine percent of participants experienced at least one form of anti-queer victimization in the past twelve months, and sixty-four percent of those victimized were victimized more than once. We also identify significant variations in victimization types and prevalence across demographic characteristics, including sexuality, gender identity, racial group, geographic location, income, education, employment, and disability status. These findings underscore the need for structural and intersectional responses to address anti-queer violence.</p>","PeriodicalId":48221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Homosexuality","volume":" ","pages":"1-38"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Homosexuality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2025.2530133","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anti-queer violence is a significant criminological, public health, and social justice concern. While international research has shown that LGBTQA+ people generally experience higher rates of victimization compared to their heterosexual and cisgender peers, knowledge about these patterns in the Australian context remains limited. Moreover, most existing research focuses on overall rates of victimization, rather than on violence specifically related to sexual orientation or gender identity, and greater clarity is needed regarding the specific types of violence experienced, their relative frequencies, and how these differ across subgroups within the LGBTQA+ population. Analyzing self-report victimization data from the largest and most diverse sample of LGBTQA+ adults ever surveyed in Australia (n = 6,835), this article reveals that anti-queer violence remains a significant and persistent problem. Fifty-nine percent of participants experienced at least one form of anti-queer victimization in the past twelve months, and sixty-four percent of those victimized were victimized more than once. We also identify significant variations in victimization types and prevalence across demographic characteristics, including sexuality, gender identity, racial group, geographic location, income, education, employment, and disability status. These findings underscore the need for structural and intersectional responses to address anti-queer violence.

澳大利亚的反酷儿暴力:LGBTQA+成年人受害的交叉分析。
反酷儿暴力是一个重要的犯罪学、公共卫生和社会正义问题。虽然国际研究表明,与异性恋和易性恋同龄人相比,LGBTQA+人群通常经历更高的受害率,但在澳大利亚的背景下,对这些模式的了解仍然有限。此外,大多数现有研究关注的是总体受害率,而不是与性取向或性别认同相关的暴力,需要更清楚地了解所经历的特定类型的暴力,它们的相对频率,以及这些在LGBTQA+人群中不同亚群体之间的差异。这篇文章分析了澳大利亚有史以来调查的最大和最多样化的LGBTQA+成年人样本(n = 6835)的自我报告受害数据,揭示了反酷儿暴力仍然是一个重要而持久的问题。59%的参与者在过去的12个月里至少经历过一种形式的反酷儿受害者,64%的受害者不止一次。我们还确定了受害者类型和人口特征的显著差异,包括性取向、性别认同、种族群体、地理位置、收入、教育、就业和残疾状况。这些发现强调了解决反酷儿暴力的结构性和交叉性反应的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: The Journal of Homosexuality is an internationally acclaimed, peer-reviewed publication devoted to publishing a wide variety of disciplinary and interdisciplinary scholarship to foster a thorough understanding of the complexities, nuances, and the multifaceted aspects of sexuality and gender. The chief aim of the journal is to publish thought-provoking scholarship by researchers, community activists, and scholars who employ a range of research methodologies and who offer a variety of perspectives to continue shaping knowledge production in the arenas of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) studies and queer studies. The Journal of Homosexuality is committed to offering substantive, accessible reading to researchers and general readers alike in the hope of: spurring additional research, offering ideas to integrate into educational programs at schools, colleges & universities, or community-based organizations, and manifesting activism against sexual and gender prejudice (e.g., homophobia, biphobia and transphobia), including the promotion of sexual and gender justice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信