Does enactment truly boost action memory? Investigating action memory through dynamic action videos.

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Wenwen Wei, Shuyi Liang, Xiang Xu, Xuefeng Wang, Xiaodong Zhao, Ping Wei, Jianqian Sun, Xufeng Liu, Shengjun Wu
{"title":"Does enactment truly boost action memory? Investigating action memory through dynamic action videos.","authors":"Wenwen Wei, Shuyi Liang, Xiang Xu, Xuefeng Wang, Xiaodong Zhao, Ping Wei, Jianqian Sun, Xufeng Liu, Shengjun Wu","doi":"10.1007/s00426-025-02151-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The significance of acquiring motor skills for daily activities and professional tasks is universally acknowledged. Two experiments were conducted to explore the impact of Self-Performed Task (SPT) and Experimenter-Performed Task (EPT) during both encoding and retrieval on the memory of dynamic sequential actions presented in videos. The first experiment, involving 48 participants, determined that SPT-encoding was more effective than EPT-encoding. The second experiment, with 60 participants, revealed a significant interaction between the encoding mode and the recognition mode. Notably, when with EPT-encoding, there was a significant difference in memory precision between the two recognition methods, with the EPT-recognition yielding better memory outcomes than the SPT-recognition. However, there was no significant difference in memory performance between the two recognition methods under the SPT-encoding conditions. Collectively, the findings of these experiments confirm the persistence of the enactment effect in the memory of dynamic and continuous actions, with some results also offering empirical support for both the two-component hypothesis and action encoding theory.</p>","PeriodicalId":48184,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung","volume":"89 4","pages":"132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12350561/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-025-02151-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The significance of acquiring motor skills for daily activities and professional tasks is universally acknowledged. Two experiments were conducted to explore the impact of Self-Performed Task (SPT) and Experimenter-Performed Task (EPT) during both encoding and retrieval on the memory of dynamic sequential actions presented in videos. The first experiment, involving 48 participants, determined that SPT-encoding was more effective than EPT-encoding. The second experiment, with 60 participants, revealed a significant interaction between the encoding mode and the recognition mode. Notably, when with EPT-encoding, there was a significant difference in memory precision between the two recognition methods, with the EPT-recognition yielding better memory outcomes than the SPT-recognition. However, there was no significant difference in memory performance between the two recognition methods under the SPT-encoding conditions. Collectively, the findings of these experiments confirm the persistence of the enactment effect in the memory of dynamic and continuous actions, with some results also offering empirical support for both the two-component hypothesis and action encoding theory.

情景真的能增强行动记忆吗?通过动态动作视频调查动作记忆。
获得日常活动和专业任务的运动技能的重要性是公认的。通过两个实验探讨了自执行任务(SPT)和实验者执行任务(EPT)在编码和检索过程中对视频中呈现的动态顺序动作记忆的影响。第一个实验涉及48名参与者,确定了spt编码比ept编码更有效。第二个实验有60名参与者,发现编码模式和识别模式之间存在显著的交互作用。值得注意的是,当使用ept编码时,两种识别方法在记忆精度上存在显著差异,ept识别的记忆结果优于spt识别。然而,在spt编码条件下,两种识别方法的记忆性能没有显著差异。总的来说,这些实验的结果证实了制定效应在动态和连续动作记忆中的持久性,其中一些结果也为双成分假说和动作编码理论提供了实证支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of human perception, attention, memory, and action. The Journal is devoted to the dissemination of knowledge based on firm experimental ground, but not to particular approaches or schools of thought. Theoretical and historical papers are welcome to the extent that they serve this general purpose; papers of an applied nature are acceptable if they contribute to basic understanding or serve to bridge the often felt gap between basic and applied research in the field covered by the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信