Renal denervation for hypertension: cross-country cost-effectiveness insights from mainland China, Japan, and Thailand.

IF 3.3 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Dai Lian, Yue Suo, Ruoyan Gai, Ning Li, Yunfeng Ren, Dunming Xiao, Jiaxin Zhao, Mingdong Zhang, Shimeng Liu, Yingyao Chen
{"title":"Renal denervation for hypertension: cross-country cost-effectiveness insights from mainland China, Japan, and Thailand.","authors":"Dai Lian, Yue Suo, Ruoyan Gai, Ning Li, Yunfeng Ren, Dunming Xiao, Jiaxin Zhao, Mingdong Zhang, Shimeng Liu, Yingyao Chen","doi":"10.1186/s13561-025-00669-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Renal denervation (RDN) has been introduced as a novel non-pharmacological intervention for patients with hypertension that is poorly controlled by pharmacological means. Our study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the Netrod RDN treatment plus antihypertensives compared with antihypertensives alone for hypertension in Mainland China, Japan and Thailand.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Markov decision-analytic model was developed to simulate the long-term clinical events, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and related costs among patients who underwent RDN regimen and antihypertensive regimen in line with Netrod-HTN trial, with yearly cycles over a 30-year horizon. This study adopted the perspectives of the healthcare systems. Cost and utility inputs were collected from published literature, price databases, expert consultations, and hospital information systems. Both costs and outcomes were discounted at a rate of 5%. Model validation, univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, and scenario analyses were conducted to verify the robustness of the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the antihypertensive regimen alone, the RDN regimen yielded a 30.61% reduction in cardiovascular, cerebral and renal events. Cost-effectiveness analysis showed the RDN regimen yielded the most favorable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in Japan at $3,451 per QALY, followed by Thailand at $13,932 per QALY, and Mainland China at $19,049 per QALY. Sensitivity and scenario analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Netrod RDN is a cost-effective intervention from the healthcare system perspective in Mainland China, Japan, and Thailand. However, its cost-effectiveness varies across countries, reflecting differences in socioeconomic contexts. In middle- and low-income countries, appropriate pricing strategies may play a key role in enhancing its affordability and cost-effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"69"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12344921/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-025-00669-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Renal denervation (RDN) has been introduced as a novel non-pharmacological intervention for patients with hypertension that is poorly controlled by pharmacological means. Our study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the Netrod RDN treatment plus antihypertensives compared with antihypertensives alone for hypertension in Mainland China, Japan and Thailand.

Methods: A Markov decision-analytic model was developed to simulate the long-term clinical events, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and related costs among patients who underwent RDN regimen and antihypertensive regimen in line with Netrod-HTN trial, with yearly cycles over a 30-year horizon. This study adopted the perspectives of the healthcare systems. Cost and utility inputs were collected from published literature, price databases, expert consultations, and hospital information systems. Both costs and outcomes were discounted at a rate of 5%. Model validation, univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, and scenario analyses were conducted to verify the robustness of the results.

Results: Compared with the antihypertensive regimen alone, the RDN regimen yielded a 30.61% reduction in cardiovascular, cerebral and renal events. Cost-effectiveness analysis showed the RDN regimen yielded the most favorable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in Japan at $3,451 per QALY, followed by Thailand at $13,932 per QALY, and Mainland China at $19,049 per QALY. Sensitivity and scenario analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings.

Conclusions: Netrod RDN is a cost-effective intervention from the healthcare system perspective in Mainland China, Japan, and Thailand. However, its cost-effectiveness varies across countries, reflecting differences in socioeconomic contexts. In middle- and low-income countries, appropriate pricing strategies may play a key role in enhancing its affordability and cost-effectiveness.

肾去神经治疗高血压:来自中国大陆、日本和泰国的成本-效果观察。
背景:肾去神经支配(RDN)已被介绍为一种新的非药物干预高血压患者,药物手段控制不佳。本研究旨在评价Netrod RDN联合降压药治疗高血压与单独降压药治疗高血压在中国大陆、日本和泰国的成本-效果。方法:建立马尔可夫决策分析模型,模拟采用Netrod-HTN试验的RDN方案和降压方案患者的长期临床事件、质量调整生命年(QALYs)和相关费用,年周期超过30年。本研究采用医疗保健系统的观点。成本和效用输入收集自已发表的文献、价格数据库、专家咨询和医院信息系统。成本和结果均按5%折现。通过模型验证、单变量和概率敏感性分析以及情景分析来验证结果的稳健性。结果:与单独降压方案相比,RDN方案降低了30.61%的心血管、脑和肾事件。成本-效果分析显示,RDN方案在日本产生了最有利的增量成本-效果比,每个QALY为3,451美元,其次是泰国,每个QALY为13,932美元,中国大陆为每个QALY 19,049美元。敏感性和情景分析证实了研究结果的稳健性。结论:从中国大陆、日本和泰国的医疗系统角度来看,Netrod RDN是一种具有成本效益的干预措施。然而,其成本效益因国家而异,反映了社会经济背景的差异。在中低收入国家,适当的定价战略可在提高其可负担性和成本效益方面发挥关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
59
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Economics Review is an international high-quality journal covering all fields of Health Economics. A broad range of theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy with a health economic focus will be considered for publication. Its scope includes macro- and microeconomics of health care financing, health insurance and reimbursement as well as health economic evaluation, health services research and health policy analysis. Further research topics are the individual and institutional aspects of health care management and the growing importance of health care in developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信