Regulatory Approved Point-of-Care Diagnostics (FDA & Health Canada): A Comprehensive Framework for Analytical Validity, Clinical Validity, and Clinical Utility in Medical Devices.

IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Moustafa Kardjadj
{"title":"Regulatory Approved Point-of-Care Diagnostics (FDA & Health Canada): A Comprehensive Framework for Analytical Validity, Clinical Validity, and Clinical Utility in Medical Devices.","authors":"Moustafa Kardjadj","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfaf106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Point-of-care (POC) diagnostic devices deliver rapid, near-patient results that drive timely clinical decisions across diverse settings (from emergency departments to home care). Their decentralized deployment mandates a rigorous, multi-phase validation strategy to ensure analytical accuracy, clinical reliability, and real-world utility before both regulatory clearance and reimbursement.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>We propose an expanded, integrated framework comprising 4 pillars:Analytical validity: Quantification of sensitivity, specificity, predictive values adjusted for prevalence, limits of detection, bias/imprecision, and reproducibility using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, Bland-Altman comparison, Passing-Bablok/Deming regression, and nonparametric techniques for semiquantitative outputs.Clinical validity: Demonstration of substantial equivalence via FDA 510(k) (Class II), de novo (novel low/moderate risk), or premarket approval (PMA; Class III with Investigational Device Exemption (IDE)-supported pivotal trials) pathways, supported by prospective, multicenter clinical studies, and human-factors usability assessments in intended use environments.Clinical utility: Evidence of improved patient care from outcome-based trials (e.g., time-to-treatment and readmission rates), health-economic analyses (cost per quality-adjusted life year and budget-impact models), and patient-reported outcome measures capturing usability, satisfaction, and adherence.Regulatory alignment: Harmonization of FDA and Health Canada requirements, including ISO 14971 risk management, post-market surveillance (21 CFR 820; Medical Device Licence [MDL] vigilance), to streamline market access and payer coverage decisions.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This comprehensive, staged validation pathway, from analytical benchmarks through clinical performance and utility to regulatory and reimbursement strategies, provides a practical roadmap for innovators, clinicians, and regulators. Embedding real-world evidence and coordinating US and Canadian frameworks accelerates the adoption of safe, effective, and value-based POC diagnostics, fostering better patient outcomes, and supporting modern precision medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Point-of-care (POC) diagnostic devices deliver rapid, near-patient results that drive timely clinical decisions across diverse settings (from emergency departments to home care). Their decentralized deployment mandates a rigorous, multi-phase validation strategy to ensure analytical accuracy, clinical reliability, and real-world utility before both regulatory clearance and reimbursement.

Content: We propose an expanded, integrated framework comprising 4 pillars:Analytical validity: Quantification of sensitivity, specificity, predictive values adjusted for prevalence, limits of detection, bias/imprecision, and reproducibility using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, Bland-Altman comparison, Passing-Bablok/Deming regression, and nonparametric techniques for semiquantitative outputs.Clinical validity: Demonstration of substantial equivalence via FDA 510(k) (Class II), de novo (novel low/moderate risk), or premarket approval (PMA; Class III with Investigational Device Exemption (IDE)-supported pivotal trials) pathways, supported by prospective, multicenter clinical studies, and human-factors usability assessments in intended use environments.Clinical utility: Evidence of improved patient care from outcome-based trials (e.g., time-to-treatment and readmission rates), health-economic analyses (cost per quality-adjusted life year and budget-impact models), and patient-reported outcome measures capturing usability, satisfaction, and adherence.Regulatory alignment: Harmonization of FDA and Health Canada requirements, including ISO 14971 risk management, post-market surveillance (21 CFR 820; Medical Device Licence [MDL] vigilance), to streamline market access and payer coverage decisions.

Summary: This comprehensive, staged validation pathway, from analytical benchmarks through clinical performance and utility to regulatory and reimbursement strategies, provides a practical roadmap for innovators, clinicians, and regulators. Embedding real-world evidence and coordinating US and Canadian frameworks accelerates the adoption of safe, effective, and value-based POC diagnostics, fostering better patient outcomes, and supporting modern precision medicine.

监管批准的护理点诊断(FDA和加拿大卫生部):医疗器械分析有效性,临床有效性和临床实用性的综合框架。
背景:护理点(POC)诊断设备提供快速、接近患者的结果,推动各种环境(从急诊科到家庭护理)的及时临床决策。他们的分散部署要求严格的多阶段验证策略,以确保分析的准确性、临床可靠性和现实世界的实用性,然后才能获得监管许可和报销。内容:我们提出了一个扩展的、集成的框架,包括4个支柱:分析有效性:敏感性、特异性、患病率调整后的预测值、检测限、偏倚/不精确和可重复性,使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析、Bland-Altman比较、Passing-Bablok/Deming回归和半定量输出的非参数技术。临床有效性:通过FDA 510(k) (II类)、de novo(新型低/中度风险)或上市前批准(PMA;III级,具有研究器械豁免(IDE)支持的关键试验)途径,由前瞻性、多中心临床研究和预期使用环境中的人为因素可用性评估支持。临床效用:来自基于结果的试验(例如,治疗时间和再入院率)、健康经济分析(每个质量调整生命年的成本和预算影响模型)和患者报告的结果测量(包括可用性、满意度和依从性)的改善患者护理的证据。监管一致性:协调FDA和加拿大卫生部的要求,包括ISO 14971风险管理、上市后监督(21 CFR 820;医疗器械牌照(MDL),以简化市场准入和付款人覆盖范围的决定。总结:这一全面的、分阶段的验证途径,从分析基准到临床表现和效用,再到监管和报销策略,为创新者、临床医生和监管机构提供了一个实用的路线图。嵌入真实世界的证据并协调美国和加拿大的框架,加速采用安全、有效和基于价值的POC诊断,促进更好的患者治疗结果,并支持现代精准医学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信