Vaccine refusal in cancer patients at the French hospital: a normative re-analysis through a 'neopotterian theory of global bioethics'.

IF 1.6 Q2 ETHICS
Henri-Corto Stoeklé, Sakina Sekkate, Jaafar Bennouna, Philippe Beuzeboc, Christian Hervé
{"title":"Vaccine refusal in cancer patients at the French hospital: a normative re-analysis through a 'neopotterian theory of global bioethics'.","authors":"Henri-Corto Stoeklé, Sakina Sekkate, Jaafar Bennouna, Philippe Beuzeboc, Christian Hervé","doi":"10.1007/s40592-025-00263-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two normative studies in empirical bioethics on the bio-ethical issues associated with the refusal of cancer patients to be vaccinated against COVID-19 or flu at the hospital, in France, applying a 'neopotterian theory of global bioethics', have been published, respectively in 2022 and 2023. Since then, substancial progress in this theory have also been published, in 2024. The publication formalizes why and, above all, how global bioethics should integrate 'moral pluralism'. Based on these advances, we performed a normative re-analysis of the secondary information extracted from the two empirical bioethics' publications. At the end of the day, the solutions are now more explicitly discerned, which are different forms of indirect obligation for vaccination - to be understood as a more or less strong incentive to vaccinate rather than a legally formalized obligation. These solutions could have an appreciable relevance in mainland France, less in French overseas territories, even in other countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":43628,"journal":{"name":"Monash Bioethics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monash Bioethics Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-025-00263-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two normative studies in empirical bioethics on the bio-ethical issues associated with the refusal of cancer patients to be vaccinated against COVID-19 or flu at the hospital, in France, applying a 'neopotterian theory of global bioethics', have been published, respectively in 2022 and 2023. Since then, substancial progress in this theory have also been published, in 2024. The publication formalizes why and, above all, how global bioethics should integrate 'moral pluralism'. Based on these advances, we performed a normative re-analysis of the secondary information extracted from the two empirical bioethics' publications. At the end of the day, the solutions are now more explicitly discerned, which are different forms of indirect obligation for vaccination - to be understood as a more or less strong incentive to vaccinate rather than a legally formalized obligation. These solutions could have an appreciable relevance in mainland France, less in French overseas territories, even in other countries.

法国医院癌症患者拒绝接种疫苗:通过“全球生物伦理学的新派理论”进行的规范性再分析。
经验生命伦理学的两项规范性研究分别于2022年和2023年发表,研究了与法国医院拒绝癌症患者接种COVID-19或流感疫苗相关的生物伦理问题,应用了“全球生物伦理学的新派理论”。从那以后,这一理论也在2024年取得了重大进展。该出版物正式阐述了全球生物伦理学为什么以及最重要的是如何整合“道德多元主义”。基于这些进展,我们对从两个经验生物伦理学出版物中提取的次要信息进行了规范的重新分析。在一天结束的时候,解决方案现在更明确地辨别出来,这是不同形式的间接疫苗接种义务-被理解为或多或少强烈的疫苗接种激励,而不是法律上正式的义务。这些解决办法在法国本土可能有相当大的相关性,而在法国海外领土,甚至在其他国家则不那么重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Monash Bioethics Review provides comprehensive coverage of traditional topics and emerging issues in bioethics. The Journal is especially concerned with empirically-informed philosophical bioethical analysis with policy relevance. Monash Bioethics Review also regularly publishes empirical studies providing explicit ethical analysis and/or with significant ethical or policy implications. Produced by the Monash University Centre for Human Bioethics since 1981 (originally as Bioethics News), Monash Bioethics Review is the oldest peer reviewed bioethics journal based in Australia–and one of the oldest bioethics journals in the world. An international forum for empirically-informed philosophical bioethical analysis with policy relevance. Includes empirical studies providing explicit ethical analysis and/or with significant ethical or policy implications. One of the oldest bioethics journals, produced by a world-leading bioethics centre. Publishes papers up to 13,000 words in length. Unique New Feature: All Articles Open for Commentary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信