Calixto Duarte-Chang, Julio Zúñiga Cisneros, Ramiro Da Silva Rodriguez
{"title":"[Diagnostic strategy following failed colonoscopy: endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy in colon cancer].","authors":"Calixto Duarte-Chang, Julio Zúñiga Cisneros, Ramiro Da Silva Rodriguez","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling is a safe and reliable method for obtaining pathological results of gastrointestinal and adjacent gastrointestinal lesions. Some colon lesions are located in the muscular layer or even in the serosa beneath the mucosa, so conventional colonoscopy with forceps biopsy is often negative. In patients with colon cancer, forceps biopsy during colonoscopy is the current standard diagnostic modality. However, there are cases that are difficult to confirm with forceps biopsy, such as stenosing tumors, or those originating from deep layers. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy (FNB) is a useful alternative for diagnosis in these cases. We present the successful case of a 62-year-old male with a history of progressive weight loss and a colonic mass at the splenic flexure, whose colonoscopy was unsuccessful, therefore a FNB puncture by EUS was performed, via transgastric route, reaching a histological diagnosis of colon adenocarcinoma. This case highlights the feasibility of FNB by EUS in the acquisition of colonic lesions through the stomach in cases of inconclusive colonoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":35807,"journal":{"name":"Revista de gastroenterologia del Peru : organo oficial de la Sociedad de Gastroenterologia del Peru","volume":"45 2","pages":"180-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de gastroenterologia del Peru : organo oficial de la Sociedad de Gastroenterologia del Peru","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling is a safe and reliable method for obtaining pathological results of gastrointestinal and adjacent gastrointestinal lesions. Some colon lesions are located in the muscular layer or even in the serosa beneath the mucosa, so conventional colonoscopy with forceps biopsy is often negative. In patients with colon cancer, forceps biopsy during colonoscopy is the current standard diagnostic modality. However, there are cases that are difficult to confirm with forceps biopsy, such as stenosing tumors, or those originating from deep layers. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy (FNB) is a useful alternative for diagnosis in these cases. We present the successful case of a 62-year-old male with a history of progressive weight loss and a colonic mass at the splenic flexure, whose colonoscopy was unsuccessful, therefore a FNB puncture by EUS was performed, via transgastric route, reaching a histological diagnosis of colon adenocarcinoma. This case highlights the feasibility of FNB by EUS in the acquisition of colonic lesions through the stomach in cases of inconclusive colonoscopy.
期刊介绍:
La REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGíA DEL PERÚ, es la publicación oficial de la Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú que publica artículos originales, artículos de revisión, reporte de casos, cartas e información general de la especialidad; dirigido a los profesionales de la salud con especial interés en la gastroenterología. La Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú es una publicación de periodicidad trimestral y tiene como objetivo la publicación de artículos científicos inéditos en el campo de la gastroenterología, proporcionando información actualizada y relevante de la especialidad y áreas afines. La Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú publica artículos en dos idiomas, español e inglés, a texto completo en la versión impresa yelectrónica. Los artículos científicos son sometidos a revisores o árbitros nacionales e internacionales, especialistas que opinan bajo la modalidad de doble ciego y de manera anónima sobre la calidad y validez de los mismos. El número de revisores depende del tipo de artículo, dos revisores como mínimo para artículos originales y uno como mínimo para otros tipos de artículos.