Economic outcomes associated with acute interstitial pneumonia in Central U.S. High Plains feedyards.

IF 1.8 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Translational Animal Science Pub Date : 2025-07-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/tas/txaf091
Merri E Day, Dustin L Pendell, Brad J White, Phillip A Lancaster, Robert L Larson
{"title":"Economic outcomes associated with acute interstitial pneumonia in Central U.S. High Plains feedyards.","authors":"Merri E Day, Dustin L Pendell, Brad J White, Phillip A Lancaster, Robert L Larson","doi":"10.1093/tas/txaf091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to evaluate net returns for Central U.S. high plains feedyard cattle identified with acute interstitial pneumonia (AIP) ante-mortem and postmortem (<i>n</i> = 5,339) and to examine economic outcomes across sex, placement weight, and number of AIP treatments. A decision tree framework was implemented to estimate net returns of cattle identified with AIP, where decision nodes represented choices made by the producer, and branches represented potential outcomes following a decision. The initial decision node was whether to treat cattle for AIP after the first identification for illness or to sell (cull) soon after diagnosis at reduced weight and price compared to cattle in the cohort sold at finished weight. Following initial treatment, cattle that remained in the feedyard either finished (with or without further treatment), were culled, or died after additional diagnosis and treatment. Probabilities of incidents at each node were obtained from the data distribution. This research indicates that estimated net returns for feedyard cattle identified with AIP vary by sex, placement weight, and number of AIP treatments. The expected net return to feeding healthy cattle was $193.67/animal, while the expected net return for cattle that finished after AIP treatment was -$639.71/animal for cattle treated once for AIP, -$612.41/animal for those treated twice for AIP, and -$529.57/animal for those treated three or more times for AIP. However, other health indicators and risk factors not included in this analysis should be considered when deciding whether to keep or cull feedyard cattle identified with AIP.</p>","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":"9 ","pages":"txaf091"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342467/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaf091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate net returns for Central U.S. high plains feedyard cattle identified with acute interstitial pneumonia (AIP) ante-mortem and postmortem (n = 5,339) and to examine economic outcomes across sex, placement weight, and number of AIP treatments. A decision tree framework was implemented to estimate net returns of cattle identified with AIP, where decision nodes represented choices made by the producer, and branches represented potential outcomes following a decision. The initial decision node was whether to treat cattle for AIP after the first identification for illness or to sell (cull) soon after diagnosis at reduced weight and price compared to cattle in the cohort sold at finished weight. Following initial treatment, cattle that remained in the feedyard either finished (with or without further treatment), were culled, or died after additional diagnosis and treatment. Probabilities of incidents at each node were obtained from the data distribution. This research indicates that estimated net returns for feedyard cattle identified with AIP vary by sex, placement weight, and number of AIP treatments. The expected net return to feeding healthy cattle was $193.67/animal, while the expected net return for cattle that finished after AIP treatment was -$639.71/animal for cattle treated once for AIP, -$612.41/animal for those treated twice for AIP, and -$529.57/animal for those treated three or more times for AIP. However, other health indicators and risk factors not included in this analysis should be considered when deciding whether to keep or cull feedyard cattle identified with AIP.

美国中部高原饲料场急性间质性肺炎的相关经济结果
本研究的目的是评估美国中部高平原饲料场被确诊为急性间质性肺炎(AIP)的牛在死前和死后的净收益(n = 5339),并检查跨性别、放置体重和AIP治疗次数的经济结果。实施了一个决策树框架来估计与AIP识别的牛的净收益,其中决策节点表示生产者做出的选择,分支表示决策后的潜在结果。最初的决策节点是,是在首次发现疾病后对牛进行AIP治疗,还是在诊断后不久以较低的重量和价格出售(剔除)与以成品体重出售的牛相比。在初步治疗后,留在饲料场的牛要么完成(有或没有进一步治疗),要么被扑杀,要么在进一步诊断和治疗后死亡。从数据分布中得到各节点的事件概率。本研究表明,被鉴定为AIP的饲料牛的估计净收益因性别、饲养体重和AIP处理次数而异。饲养健康牛的预期净收益为每头牛193.67美元,而接受一次AIP治疗的牛的预期净收益为- 639.71美元/头牛,接受两次AIP治疗的牛的预期净收益为- 612.41美元/头牛,接受三次或以上AIP治疗的牛的预期净收益为- 529.57美元/头牛。然而,在决定是否饲养或扑杀经AIP鉴定的饲料场牛时,应考虑本分析中未包括的其他健康指标和风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Animal Science
Translational Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信