Development and Validation of An Interpretable Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model of Postpartum Hemorrhage in Placenta Previa Following Cesarean Section: A Multicenter Study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Reproductive Sciences Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-12 DOI:10.1007/s43032-025-01937-0
Mianmian Li, Xinhui Su, Wenxin Liao, Li Huang, Yihong Yang, Xizi Wu, Yao Fan, Jing Liu, Xin Yang, Zhen Zeng, Wencheng Ding, Wanjiang Zeng, Xiaoyan Xu
{"title":"Development and Validation of An Interpretable Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model of Postpartum Hemorrhage in Placenta Previa Following Cesarean Section: A Multicenter Study.","authors":"Mianmian Li, Xinhui Su, Wenxin Liao, Li Huang, Yihong Yang, Xizi Wu, Yao Fan, Jing Liu, Xin Yang, Zhen Zeng, Wencheng Ding, Wanjiang Zeng, Xiaoyan Xu","doi":"10.1007/s43032-025-01937-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study is to predict the occurrence of postpartum hemorrhage in women with placenta previa based on machine learning. This retrospective study enrolled 845 singleton pregnant patients with placenta previa from two hospitals. They were allocated into a training cohort (n = 403), a testing cohort (n = 174), and the external validation cohort (n = 268). Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were employed to select clinical variables (p < 0.05), which were subsequently utilized to develop 11 machine learning prediction models. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), decision curve analysis (DCA), accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SEN), and specificity (SPE) were used to evaluate the performance of the models. Besides, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to interpret the role and effectiveness of variables in the predictive model. Three machine learning models with the best predictive performance were combined into a Prediction Ensemble Classifier through voting. The Gradient Boosting Machine demonstrated the best predictive performance. In the validation cohort, AUC of the Gradient Boosting Machine model is 0.810(95% CI 0.754-0.865), ACC was 0.765(95% CI 0.716-0.813), SEN was 0.613(95% CI 0.513-0.723), while these values of the Prediction Ensemble Classifier were 0.813(0.756-0.871), 0.806(0.757-0.854), and 0.480(0.375-0.597), respectively. The importance of SHAP variables in the model, ranked from high to low, is as follows: d-dimer, ultrasound diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum, neutrophils, prothrombin time, and platelets. The Gradient Boosting Machine model demonstrated excellent performance in predicting postpartum hemorrhage in cases of placenta previa. Furthermore, SHAP analysis enabled interpretation of the variables in the model.</p>","PeriodicalId":20920,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"3062-3073"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12443912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-025-01937-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study is to predict the occurrence of postpartum hemorrhage in women with placenta previa based on machine learning. This retrospective study enrolled 845 singleton pregnant patients with placenta previa from two hospitals. They were allocated into a training cohort (n = 403), a testing cohort (n = 174), and the external validation cohort (n = 268). Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were employed to select clinical variables (p < 0.05), which were subsequently utilized to develop 11 machine learning prediction models. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), decision curve analysis (DCA), accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SEN), and specificity (SPE) were used to evaluate the performance of the models. Besides, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to interpret the role and effectiveness of variables in the predictive model. Three machine learning models with the best predictive performance were combined into a Prediction Ensemble Classifier through voting. The Gradient Boosting Machine demonstrated the best predictive performance. In the validation cohort, AUC of the Gradient Boosting Machine model is 0.810(95% CI 0.754-0.865), ACC was 0.765(95% CI 0.716-0.813), SEN was 0.613(95% CI 0.513-0.723), while these values of the Prediction Ensemble Classifier were 0.813(0.756-0.871), 0.806(0.757-0.854), and 0.480(0.375-0.597), respectively. The importance of SHAP variables in the model, ranked from high to low, is as follows: d-dimer, ultrasound diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum, neutrophils, prothrombin time, and platelets. The Gradient Boosting Machine model demonstrated excellent performance in predicting postpartum hemorrhage in cases of placenta previa. Furthermore, SHAP analysis enabled interpretation of the variables in the model.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于机器学习的剖宫产术后前置胎盘出血可解释性预测模型的建立与验证:一项多中心研究。
本研究的目的是基于机器学习预测前置胎盘妇女产后出血的发生。本回顾性研究纳入来自两家医院的845例单胎妊娠前置胎盘患者。他们被分为训练组(n = 403)、测试组(n = 174)和外部验证组(n = 268)。采用单因素和多因素回归分析选择临床变量(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reproductive Sciences
Reproductive Sciences 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
322
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Sciences (RS) is a peer-reviewed, monthly journal publishing original research and reviews in obstetrics and gynecology. RS is multi-disciplinary and includes research in basic reproductive biology and medicine, maternal-fetal medicine, obstetrics, gynecology, reproductive endocrinology, urogynecology, fertility/infertility, embryology, gynecologic/reproductive oncology, developmental biology, stem cell research, molecular/cellular biology and other related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信