Predicting Shock Syndrome in Kawasaki Disease: A Machine Learning Model for Enhanced Diagnosis.

IF 6.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yifeng Xu, Yuting Pan, Yifan Xie, Lingzhi Qiu, Zhidan Fan, Haiguo Yu
{"title":"Predicting Shock Syndrome in Kawasaki Disease: A Machine Learning Model for Enhanced Diagnosis.","authors":"Yifeng Xu, Yuting Pan, Yifan Xie, Lingzhi Qiu, Zhidan Fan, Haiguo Yu","doi":"10.1093/qjmed/hcaf180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Kawasaki disease shock syndrome (KDSS), a severe and uncommon phenomenon, lacks effective predictive models for early identification.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to establish a new predictive model for KDSS using machine learning.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center, retrospective analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data of 746 children with KD admitted between July 2021 and June 2023 were collected including demographics, laboratory test results before intravenous immunoglobulin, and echocardiography results. Data were divided into training and testing sets in a 7:3 ratio. After feature engineering, predictive models were built using random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM). Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), confusion matrix, average accuracy from five-fold cross-validation, while also analyzing misclassified cases. A simple early prediction tool was created based on the optimal model. Prospective data from five KDSS patients admitted between January and June 2024 and that of 15 randomly selected non-shock KD patients were used for external validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CD3+ lymphocyte percentage(CD3+%) had the greatest impact on the model and was an important predictive factor for KDSS, followed by neutrophil-to-lymphocyte(NLR) ratio and Interleukin-6(IL-6). The LightGBM model performed best (AUC, 0.9388; average accuracy, 0.9675; 95% CI, 0.9612, 0.9737). Nine patients were misclassified (4.02%). RF and LR models showed slightly lower performance than the LightGBM model (prospective validation AUC, 0.9000; accuracy, 0.8500).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We constructed an early prediction model for KDSS and performed preliminary validation. This web-based prediction tool may assist clinicians in identifying high-risk pediatric patients to enhance monitoring/treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":20806,"journal":{"name":"QJM: An International Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"QJM: An International Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcaf180","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Kawasaki disease shock syndrome (KDSS), a severe and uncommon phenomenon, lacks effective predictive models for early identification.

Aim: This study aimed to establish a new predictive model for KDSS using machine learning.

Design: Single-center, retrospective analysis.

Methods: Data of 746 children with KD admitted between July 2021 and June 2023 were collected including demographics, laboratory test results before intravenous immunoglobulin, and echocardiography results. Data were divided into training and testing sets in a 7:3 ratio. After feature engineering, predictive models were built using random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM). Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), confusion matrix, average accuracy from five-fold cross-validation, while also analyzing misclassified cases. A simple early prediction tool was created based on the optimal model. Prospective data from five KDSS patients admitted between January and June 2024 and that of 15 randomly selected non-shock KD patients were used for external validation.

Results: CD3+ lymphocyte percentage(CD3+%) had the greatest impact on the model and was an important predictive factor for KDSS, followed by neutrophil-to-lymphocyte(NLR) ratio and Interleukin-6(IL-6). The LightGBM model performed best (AUC, 0.9388; average accuracy, 0.9675; 95% CI, 0.9612, 0.9737). Nine patients were misclassified (4.02%). RF and LR models showed slightly lower performance than the LightGBM model (prospective validation AUC, 0.9000; accuracy, 0.8500).

Conclusion: We constructed an early prediction model for KDSS and performed preliminary validation. This web-based prediction tool may assist clinicians in identifying high-risk pediatric patients to enhance monitoring/treatment.

预测川崎病休克综合征:一种增强诊断的机器学习模型。
背景:川崎病休克综合征(Kawasaki disease shock syndrome, KDSS)是一种严重而罕见的疾病,缺乏有效的早期诊断预测模型。目的:利用机器学习技术建立一种新的KDSS预测模型。设计:单中心回顾性分析。方法:收集2021年7月至2023年6月住院的746例KD患儿的人口统计学资料、静脉注射免疫球蛋白前的实验室检查结果和超声心动图结果。数据以7:3的比例分为训练集和测试集。在特征工程之后,使用随机森林(RF)、逻辑回归(LR)和光梯度增强机(LightGBM)建立预测模型。使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、混淆矩阵、五重交叉验证的平均准确率来评估模型的性能,同时也分析了错误分类的情况。基于最优模型建立了一个简单的早期预测工具。前瞻性数据来自2024年1月至6月入院的5名KDSS患者和15名随机选择的非休克性KD患者,用于外部验证。结果:CD3+淋巴细胞百分比(CD3+%)对模型影响最大,是KDSS的重要预测因子,其次是中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞(NLR)比和白细胞介素-6(IL-6)。LightGBM模型表现最佳(AUC为0.9388;平均准确率为0.9675;95% ci, 0.9612, 0.9737)。误诊9例(4.02%)。RF和LR模型的性能略低于LightGBM模型(预期验证AUC为0.9000;准确性,0.8500)。结论:建立了KDSS的早期预测模型,并进行了初步验证。这个基于网络的预测工具可以帮助临床医生识别高危儿科患者,以加强监测/治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
263
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: QJM, a renowned and reputable general medical journal, has been a prominent source of knowledge in the field of internal medicine. With a steadfast commitment to advancing medical science and practice, it features a selection of rigorously reviewed articles. Released on a monthly basis, QJM encompasses a wide range of article types. These include original papers that contribute innovative research, editorials that offer expert opinions, and reviews that provide comprehensive analyses of specific topics. The journal also presents commentary papers aimed at initiating discussions on controversial subjects and allocates a dedicated section for reader correspondence. In summary, QJM's reputable standing stems from its enduring presence in the medical community, consistent publication schedule, and diverse range of content designed to inform and engage readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信