Sustainable Removal of Metaldehyde Pesticide via Modified Cellulose Adsorbents.

IF 2.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Gulab Said, Muhammad Ilyas, Bekzat Tynybekov, Thiago Machado da Silva Acioly, Patricio De Los Rios-Escalante
{"title":"Sustainable Removal of Metaldehyde Pesticide via Modified Cellulose Adsorbents.","authors":"Gulab Said, Muhammad Ilyas, Bekzat Tynybekov, Thiago Machado da Silva Acioly, Patricio De Los Rios-Escalante","doi":"10.1002/jemt.70052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, commercial, plant-based, and paper-based cellulose acetate (CCA) was modified to develop an efficient adsorbent for removing metaldehyde (MD) from aqueous solutions. The modified commercial CCA exhibited the best performance and was selected for further characterization using FTIR, EDX, SEM, and XRD. Batch experiments were conducted to assess the effects of parameters such as contact time (10-100 min), initial MD concentration (10-100 mg/L), adsorbent dosage (0.01-0.12 g), and pH (2-12). Kinetic, isotherm, and thermodynamic analyses were carried out to gain a deeper understanding of the adsorption process. The maximum MD removal observed was 55.34% at an optimal dosage of 0.08 g and room temperature (25°C). The experimental data were best fitted by the pseudo-second-order and power function models, with correlation coefficients of 0.9947 and 0.9917, respectively. Among the isotherm models tested, including Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin, Jovanovich, and Harkins-Jura, the Freundlich model provided the best fit for equilibrium data (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.995), indicating that the adsorption occurred in a heterogeneous environment. The maximum adsorption capacity was 2.21 mg/g. Thermodynamic analysis revealed that the adsorption process was exothermic and spontaneous, with an enthalpy change (ΔH°) of -29.9 kJ/mol, entropy change (ΔS°) of 91.29 J/mol, and Gibbs free energy (ΔG°) values of -7.27, -4.45, and -2.65 kJ/mol at 298, 313, and 328 K, respectively. These findings suggest that CCA could be a promising alternative to activated carbon for adsorbent applications, providing a more energy-efficient solution. Further studies are necessary using other pollutants.</p>","PeriodicalId":18684,"journal":{"name":"Microscopy Research and Technique","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microscopy Research and Technique","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.70052","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, commercial, plant-based, and paper-based cellulose acetate (CCA) was modified to develop an efficient adsorbent for removing metaldehyde (MD) from aqueous solutions. The modified commercial CCA exhibited the best performance and was selected for further characterization using FTIR, EDX, SEM, and XRD. Batch experiments were conducted to assess the effects of parameters such as contact time (10-100 min), initial MD concentration (10-100 mg/L), adsorbent dosage (0.01-0.12 g), and pH (2-12). Kinetic, isotherm, and thermodynamic analyses were carried out to gain a deeper understanding of the adsorption process. The maximum MD removal observed was 55.34% at an optimal dosage of 0.08 g and room temperature (25°C). The experimental data were best fitted by the pseudo-second-order and power function models, with correlation coefficients of 0.9947 and 0.9917, respectively. Among the isotherm models tested, including Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin, Jovanovich, and Harkins-Jura, the Freundlich model provided the best fit for equilibrium data (R2 = 0.995), indicating that the adsorption occurred in a heterogeneous environment. The maximum adsorption capacity was 2.21 mg/g. Thermodynamic analysis revealed that the adsorption process was exothermic and spontaneous, with an enthalpy change (ΔH°) of -29.9 kJ/mol, entropy change (ΔS°) of 91.29 J/mol, and Gibbs free energy (ΔG°) values of -7.27, -4.45, and -2.65 kJ/mol at 298, 313, and 328 K, respectively. These findings suggest that CCA could be a promising alternative to activated carbon for adsorbent applications, providing a more energy-efficient solution. Further studies are necessary using other pollutants.

改性纤维素吸附剂对甲醛农药的可持续去除研究。
在这项研究中,对商业、植物基和纸基醋酸纤维素(CCA)进行了改性,以开发一种有效的吸附剂,用于从水溶液中去除三聚乙醛(MD)。采用FTIR、EDX、SEM和XRD对改性后的商用CCA进行了进一步的表征。通过批量实验考察了接触时间(10-100 min)、MD初始浓度(10-100 mg/L)、吸附剂用量(0.01-0.12 g)、pH(2-12)等参数对吸附效果的影响。进行了动力学、等温线和热力学分析,以加深对吸附过程的了解。在最佳投加量为0.08 g、室温(25℃)条件下,MD去除率达到55.34%。拟二阶和幂函数模型拟合效果最好,相关系数分别为0.9947和0.9917。在Langmuir、Freundlich、Temkin、Jovanovich和Harkins-Jura等温线模型中,Freundlich模型对平衡数据拟合最佳(R2 = 0.995),表明吸附发生在非均相环境中。最大吸附量为2.21 mg/g。热力学分析表明,吸附过程为放热自发过程,在298、313和328 K时焓变(ΔH°)为-29.9 kJ/mol,熵变(ΔS°)为91.29 J/mol,吉布斯自由能(ΔG°)分别为-7.27、-4.45和-2.65 kJ/mol。这些发现表明,CCA可能是活性炭吸附剂应用的一个有前途的替代品,提供了一种更节能的解决方案。使用其他污染物进行进一步研究是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microscopy Research and Technique
Microscopy Research and Technique 医学-解剖学与形态学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
233
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Microscopy Research and Technique (MRT) publishes articles on all aspects of advanced microscopy original architecture and methodologies with applications in the biological, clinical, chemical, and materials sciences. Original basic and applied research as well as technical papers dealing with the various subsets of microscopy are encouraged. MRT is the right form for those developing new microscopy methods or using the microscope to answer key questions in basic and applied research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信