Understanding the sexual concerns of older women presenting for care to women's health clinics: a cross-sectional study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Jana Karam, Chrisandra Shufelt, Sheryl Kingsberg, Kristin Cole, Stacey Winham, Ekta Kapoor, Juliana M Kling, Stephanie S Faubion
{"title":"Understanding the sexual concerns of older women presenting for care to women's health clinics: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Jana Karam, Chrisandra Shufelt, Sheryl Kingsberg, Kristin Cole, Stacey Winham, Ekta Kapoor, Juliana M Kling, Stephanie S Faubion","doi":"10.1097/GME.0000000000002617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the prevalence of female sexual dysfunction (FSD) and distress between sexually active midlife women (50-64 y) and older women (65+ y) presenting for care at women's health clinics at a tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included women aged 50 and above who received care at Mayo Clinic women's health clinics in Rochester, MN; Scottsdale, AZ; and Jacksonville, FL, between May 1, 2015, and August 31, 2022. Sexual function and distress were compared between midlife and older women using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised (FSDS-R), and self-reported sexual health concerns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3,465 sexually active women, older women were less likely to report loss of sexual desire (33.4% vs. 47.6%; P<0.001) and reduced genital sensation (13.0% vs. 16.9%; P=0.024) compared with midlife women. There were no significant differences for vaginal dryness, painful intercourse, or arousal/orgasm difficulties. FSFI scores were higher in older women for desire (3.0 vs. 2.4; P<0.001) and lubrication (3.9 vs. 3.6; P<0.001). While total FSFI scores were similar between older and midlife women (21.2 vs. 22.2; P=0.11), sexually related distress was lower in older women compared with midlife women (13.0 vs. 15.0; P=0.015). The prevalence of FSD (defined as FSFI score ≤26.55 and FSDS-R score ≥11) was similar between groups (51.8% vs. 56.2%; P=0.056).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Older women experienced FSD at similar rates as midlife women but reported less sexual distress, potentially reflecting lower expectations regarding sexual function. Addressing sexual health concerns in older women may enhance quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":18435,"journal":{"name":"Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000002617","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the prevalence of female sexual dysfunction (FSD) and distress between sexually active midlife women (50-64 y) and older women (65+ y) presenting for care at women's health clinics at a tertiary care center.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included women aged 50 and above who received care at Mayo Clinic women's health clinics in Rochester, MN; Scottsdale, AZ; and Jacksonville, FL, between May 1, 2015, and August 31, 2022. Sexual function and distress were compared between midlife and older women using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised (FSDS-R), and self-reported sexual health concerns.

Results: Among 3,465 sexually active women, older women were less likely to report loss of sexual desire (33.4% vs. 47.6%; P<0.001) and reduced genital sensation (13.0% vs. 16.9%; P=0.024) compared with midlife women. There were no significant differences for vaginal dryness, painful intercourse, or arousal/orgasm difficulties. FSFI scores were higher in older women for desire (3.0 vs. 2.4; P<0.001) and lubrication (3.9 vs. 3.6; P<0.001). While total FSFI scores were similar between older and midlife women (21.2 vs. 22.2; P=0.11), sexually related distress was lower in older women compared with midlife women (13.0 vs. 15.0; P=0.015). The prevalence of FSD (defined as FSFI score ≤26.55 and FSDS-R score ≥11) was similar between groups (51.8% vs. 56.2%; P=0.056).

Conclusions: Older women experienced FSD at similar rates as midlife women but reported less sexual distress, potentially reflecting lower expectations regarding sexual function. Addressing sexual health concerns in older women may enhance quality of life.

了解到妇女保健诊所就诊的老年妇女的性问题:一项横断面研究。
目的:比较在三级保健中心妇女保健诊所就诊的性活跃中年妇女(50-64岁)和老年妇女(65岁以上)的女性性功能障碍(FSD)患病率和苦恼程度。方法:这项横断面研究纳入了在明尼苏达州罗切斯特市梅奥诊所妇女健康诊所接受治疗的50岁及以上妇女;斯科茨代尔,阿兹;2015年5月1日至2022年8月31日期间,佛罗里达州杰克逊维尔。使用女性性功能指数(FSFI)、女性性困扰量表-修订版(FSDS-R)和自我报告的性健康问题比较中年和老年妇女的性功能和困扰。结果:在3,465名性活跃女性中,老年女性报告性欲丧失的可能性较小(33.4% vs. 47.6%;结论:老年女性经历FSD的比例与中年女性相似,但报告的性困扰较少,可能反映出对性功能的期望较低。解决老年妇女的性健康问题可提高生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Menopause, published monthly, provides a forum for new research, applied basic science, and clinical guidelines on all aspects of menopause. The scope and usefulness of the journal extend beyond gynecology, encompassing many varied biomedical areas, including internal medicine, family practice, medical subspecialties such as cardiology and geriatrics, epidemiology, pathology, sociology, psychology, anthropology, and pharmacology. This forum is essential to help integrate these areas, highlight needs for future research, and enhance health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信