Cell surface proteins of indigenous probiotics render antagonistic and protective effect on gut barrier integrity against extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) Escherichia coli.

IF 2.1 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Basavaprabhu Haranahalli Nataraj, Ramesh Chette, Rashmi Hogarehalli Mallappa
{"title":"Cell surface proteins of indigenous probiotics render antagonistic and protective effect on gut barrier integrity against extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) Escherichia coli.","authors":"Basavaprabhu Haranahalli Nataraj, Ramesh Chette, Rashmi Hogarehalli Mallappa","doi":"10.1093/lambio/ovaf110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gut-mediated infections fostered by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli are increasingly prevalent in clinical settings, posing a significant challenge to the efficacy of conventional antibiotic therapy. This underscores the urgent need to identify alternatives-to-antibiotics. In this study, we investigated the antagonistic potential of total surface proteins derived from probiotic strains viz. Limosilactobacillus fermentum LbS4 (MTCC 5954), L. fermentum Lf1 (MTCC 5689), Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM, and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG), against clinical isolates of ESBL E. coli (9/234 and 23/208). Surface proteins were extracted using lithium chloride as chaotropic agent. Surface proteins exhibited strain-specific heterogeneity, as revealed by SDS-PAGE profiling. These proteins significantly (P < 0.05) reduced E. coli muco-adhesion through protective (hampering the bacterial adhesion), competitive (competition for adhesion sites), and displacement (dislodgement of adhered bacteria) mechanisms. While remaining non-toxic, surface proteins revealed anti-colonization efficacy against ESBL E. coli on HT-29 cell line and preserved epithelial integrity, as demonstrated by FITC-dextran transflux assays. In contrast, ESBL E. coli (109 CFU mL-1) compromised epithelial integrity by increasing FITC-dextran permeability, which was significantly (P < 0.05) mitigated by co-treatment with surface proteins. Overall, this study highlights the potential of probiotic-derived surface proteins as promising postbiotic candidates for countering ESBL E. coli colonization and preserving gut barrier integrity.</p>","PeriodicalId":17962,"journal":{"name":"Letters in Applied Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Letters in Applied Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/lambio/ovaf110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gut-mediated infections fostered by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli are increasingly prevalent in clinical settings, posing a significant challenge to the efficacy of conventional antibiotic therapy. This underscores the urgent need to identify alternatives-to-antibiotics. In this study, we investigated the antagonistic potential of total surface proteins derived from probiotic strains viz. Limosilactobacillus fermentum LbS4 (MTCC 5954), L. fermentum Lf1 (MTCC 5689), Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM, and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG), against clinical isolates of ESBL E. coli (9/234 and 23/208). Surface proteins were extracted using lithium chloride as chaotropic agent. Surface proteins exhibited strain-specific heterogeneity, as revealed by SDS-PAGE profiling. These proteins significantly (P < 0.05) reduced E. coli muco-adhesion through protective (hampering the bacterial adhesion), competitive (competition for adhesion sites), and displacement (dislodgement of adhered bacteria) mechanisms. While remaining non-toxic, surface proteins revealed anti-colonization efficacy against ESBL E. coli on HT-29 cell line and preserved epithelial integrity, as demonstrated by FITC-dextran transflux assays. In contrast, ESBL E. coli (109 CFU mL-1) compromised epithelial integrity by increasing FITC-dextran permeability, which was significantly (P < 0.05) mitigated by co-treatment with surface proteins. Overall, this study highlights the potential of probiotic-derived surface proteins as promising postbiotic candidates for countering ESBL E. coli colonization and preserving gut barrier integrity.

原生益生菌细胞表面蛋白对大肠杆菌扩展谱β -内酰胺酶(ESBL)具有拮抗和保护肠道屏障完整性的作用。
由广谱β -内酰胺酶(ESBL)产生的大肠杆菌介导的肠道感染在临床环境中越来越普遍,对传统抗生素治疗的疗效提出了重大挑战。这强调了迫切需要确定抗生素的替代品。在这项研究中,我们研究了益生菌菌株发酵乳酸杆菌LbS4 (MTCC 5954)、发酵乳杆菌Lf1 (MTCC 5689)、嗜酸乳杆菌NCFM和鼠李糖乳杆菌GG (LGG)的总表面蛋白对ESBL大肠杆菌临床分离株(9/234和23/208)的拮抗作用。用氯化锂作朝变性剂提取表面蛋白。SDS-PAGE分析显示,表面蛋白具有菌株特异性异质性。这些蛋白显著(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Letters in Applied Microbiology
Letters in Applied Microbiology 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
225
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of & Letters in Applied Microbiology are two of the flagship research journals of the Society for Applied Microbiology (SfAM). For more than 75 years they have been publishing top quality research and reviews in the broad field of applied microbiology. The journals are provided to all SfAM members as well as having a global online readership totalling more than 500,000 downloads per year in more than 200 countries. Submitting authors can expect fast decision and publication times, averaging 33 days to first decision and 34 days from acceptance to online publication. There are no page charges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信