Do We Need a Negative Culture? Examining the Role of Final Debridement Cultures in Microsurgical Limb Salvage: Recommendations from Our 13-Year Experience.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Rachel N Rohrich, Joshua P Carreras, Sahil Sharma, Ryan P Lin, Sami Ferdousian, Meghan E Currin, Richard C Youn, Christopher E Attinger, Karen K Evans
{"title":"Do We Need a Negative Culture? Examining the Role of Final Debridement Cultures in Microsurgical Limb Salvage: Recommendations from Our 13-Year Experience.","authors":"Rachel N Rohrich, Joshua P Carreras, Sahil Sharma, Ryan P Lin, Sami Ferdousian, Meghan E Currin, Richard C Youn, Christopher E Attinger, Karen K Evans","doi":"10.1055/a-2659-7184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lower extremity free tissue transfer (LE FTT) expands limb salvage options for patients with chronic wounds. Infected wounds require serial debridement to optimize the wound bed before reconstruction, but the role of qualitative microbiological cultures in guiding surgical wound closure timing remains unclear. This study evaluates the impact of final preoperative culture results on postoperative outcomes, including flap success, infection rates, and limb salvage.A retrospective review of 344 patients undergoing LE FTT at a single institution was conducted. All patients underwent serial debridement, with final cultures obtained from the final debridement prior to flap reconstruction. Patients were stratified into positive and negative final culture groups. Subgroup analyses assessed the impact of polymicrobial colonization and comorbidity burden (Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI] >6) on outcomes. Primary outcome was flap infection, defined as any documented clinical concern for infection, including cellulitis, purulent drainage, abscess formation, or initiation of targeted antibiotic therapy.Polymicrobial final cultures were associated with increased infection (<i>p</i> = 0.003) and flap complications (<i>p</i> = 0.041). Among patients with CCI >6, positive final culture was associated with significantly higher infection rates (<i>p</i> = 0.032), but not among those with CCI ≤6. In the total cohort, comparing positive final culture to negative final culture, flap outcomes were similar between groups.Final culture positivity alone does not predict poor outcomes, but polymicrobial cultures and host factors may increase flap infection risk. A risk-stratified approach should guide surgical decision-making, with additional debridement and/or wound bed optimization considered for polymicrobial wounds and polymorbid patients (CCI >6).</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2659-7184","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lower extremity free tissue transfer (LE FTT) expands limb salvage options for patients with chronic wounds. Infected wounds require serial debridement to optimize the wound bed before reconstruction, but the role of qualitative microbiological cultures in guiding surgical wound closure timing remains unclear. This study evaluates the impact of final preoperative culture results on postoperative outcomes, including flap success, infection rates, and limb salvage.A retrospective review of 344 patients undergoing LE FTT at a single institution was conducted. All patients underwent serial debridement, with final cultures obtained from the final debridement prior to flap reconstruction. Patients were stratified into positive and negative final culture groups. Subgroup analyses assessed the impact of polymicrobial colonization and comorbidity burden (Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI] >6) on outcomes. Primary outcome was flap infection, defined as any documented clinical concern for infection, including cellulitis, purulent drainage, abscess formation, or initiation of targeted antibiotic therapy.Polymicrobial final cultures were associated with increased infection (p = 0.003) and flap complications (p = 0.041). Among patients with CCI >6, positive final culture was associated with significantly higher infection rates (p = 0.032), but not among those with CCI ≤6. In the total cohort, comparing positive final culture to negative final culture, flap outcomes were similar between groups.Final culture positivity alone does not predict poor outcomes, but polymicrobial cultures and host factors may increase flap infection risk. A risk-stratified approach should guide surgical decision-making, with additional debridement and/or wound bed optimization considered for polymicrobial wounds and polymorbid patients (CCI >6).

我们需要消极文化吗?检查最后清创培养在显微外科肢体保留中的作用:来自我们13年经验的建议。
下肢游离组织移植(LE FTT)扩展了慢性创伤患者的肢体挽救选择。感染的伤口在重建前需要连续清创以优化伤口床,但定性微生物培养在指导手术伤口关闭时机方面的作用尚不清楚。本研究评估了最终术前培养结果对术后结果的影响,包括皮瓣成功、感染率和肢体保留。对344例在同一医院接受LE FTT的患者进行回顾性分析。所有患者都进行了连续的清创,在皮瓣重建之前进行了最后的清创培养。将患者分为阳性和阴性最终培养组。亚组分析评估了多微生物定植和共病负担(Charlson共病指数[CCI] bb60)对结果的影响。主要结果是皮瓣感染,定义为任何临床记录的感染,包括蜂窝织炎、化脓性引流、脓肿形成或开始靶向抗生素治疗。多微生物终培养与感染增加(p = 0.003)和皮瓣并发症(p = 0.041)相关。在CCI≤6的患者中,最终培养阳性与较高的感染率相关(p = 0.032),但在CCI≤6的患者中无明显相关性。在整个队列中,比较末培养阳性和末培养阴性,两组间皮瓣结果相似。单独的最终培养阳性不能预测不良结果,但多微生物培养和宿主因素可能增加皮瓣感染的风险。风险分层方法应指导手术决策,考虑对多微生物伤口和多疾病患者进行额外的清创和/或伤口床优化(CCI bbb6)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信