{"title":"Comparison of rectal and bladder dose between retractor insertion and gauze packing in intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer.","authors":"Noriko Osaki, Takashi Soyano, Shinya Sutani, Hideki Matsumoto, Atsuya Takeda, Atsunori Yorozu","doi":"10.1093/jrr/rraf042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to compare and verify the rectal and bladder doses of intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) using both rectal retractor (RR) and gauze packing (GP) in the same patients. A total of 37 patients who underwent ICBT using RR and GP for cervical cancer were included in this study. Rectal and bladder dose and volume data were compared with the RR and GP treatments in the same patients and the confounding factors were examined. When comparing RR and GP, the median and interquartile ranges for rectal D2cc were 2.8 (2.5-3.7) Gy with RR and 3.2 (2.7-3.8) Gy with GP. The median bladder D2cc was 4.9 (4.5-6.3) Gy with RR and 4.8 (3.9-5.4) Gy with GP. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed that rectal doses were significantly lower with RR (P = 0.02), whereas bladder doses were significantly higher with RR (P < 0.001). Analysis of the correlation between the number of gauze pieces and the difference in rectal D2cc between GP and RR using Pearson's distribution revealed no significant correlation (R = -0.20, P = 0.22), as well as bladder D2cc between GP and RR also revealed no significant correlation (R = -0.20, P = 0.22). The number of gauze pieces did not necessarily correlate with a reduction in the rectal and bladder dose. In conclusion, rectal D2cc was lower with RR in image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer, whereas bladder D2cc was higher with RR than with GP.</p>","PeriodicalId":16922,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Research","volume":" ","pages":"528-534"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460046/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rraf042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to compare and verify the rectal and bladder doses of intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) using both rectal retractor (RR) and gauze packing (GP) in the same patients. A total of 37 patients who underwent ICBT using RR and GP for cervical cancer were included in this study. Rectal and bladder dose and volume data were compared with the RR and GP treatments in the same patients and the confounding factors were examined. When comparing RR and GP, the median and interquartile ranges for rectal D2cc were 2.8 (2.5-3.7) Gy with RR and 3.2 (2.7-3.8) Gy with GP. The median bladder D2cc was 4.9 (4.5-6.3) Gy with RR and 4.8 (3.9-5.4) Gy with GP. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed that rectal doses were significantly lower with RR (P = 0.02), whereas bladder doses were significantly higher with RR (P < 0.001). Analysis of the correlation between the number of gauze pieces and the difference in rectal D2cc between GP and RR using Pearson's distribution revealed no significant correlation (R = -0.20, P = 0.22), as well as bladder D2cc between GP and RR also revealed no significant correlation (R = -0.20, P = 0.22). The number of gauze pieces did not necessarily correlate with a reduction in the rectal and bladder dose. In conclusion, rectal D2cc was lower with RR in image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer, whereas bladder D2cc was higher with RR than with GP.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Radiation Research (JRR) is an official journal of The Japanese Radiation Research Society (JRRS), and the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO).
Since its launch in 1960 as the official journal of the JRRS, the journal has published scientific articles in radiation science in biology, chemistry, physics, epidemiology, and environmental sciences. JRR broadened its scope to include oncology in 2009, when JASTRO partnered with the JRRS to publish the journal.
Articles considered fall into two broad categories:
Oncology & Medicine - including all aspects of research with patients that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. Papers which cover related radiation therapies, radiation dosimetry, and those describing the basis for treatment methods including techniques, are also welcomed. Clinical case reports are not acceptable.
Radiation Research - basic science studies of radiation effects on livings in the area of physics, chemistry, biology, epidemiology and environmental sciences.
Please be advised that JRR does not accept any papers of pure physics or chemistry.
The journal is bimonthly, and is edited and published by the JRR Editorial Committee.