Acute-onset Concomitant Esotropia in Children: A Comparison of Clinical Features and Treatment Outcomes.

IF 1.5 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research Pub Date : 2025-07-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.18502/jovr.v20.14661
Ying Wang, Jingjing Jiang, Li Li
{"title":"Acute-onset Concomitant Esotropia in Children: A Comparison of Clinical Features and Treatment Outcomes.","authors":"Ying Wang, Jingjing Jiang, Li Li","doi":"10.18502/jovr.v20.14661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate and compare the clinical features and efficacy of botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) injection versus surgery in acute-onset concomitant esotropia (ACE) in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective comparative clinical study was conducted on 40 children with ACE. The patients were assigned to either the surgery group (<i>n</i> = 23) or the BTX-A group (<i>n</i> = 17). Successful motor outcomes were defined as residual esodeviation of <math><mo><</mo></math> 5 prism diopters (PD), while successful sensory outcomes were defined as the presence of any evidence of sensory fusion or stereopsis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average treatment age in this study was 7.02 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 3.72 years in the BTX-A group and 6.41 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 2.83 years in the surgery group. There were 5 cases of type I (12.50%), 26 cases of type II (65.00%), and 9 cases of type III (22.50%) for ACE. The deviation before treatment was +(41.35 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 16.90) PD at near and +(39.71 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 14.94) PD at distance in the BTX-A group. In the surgery group, the results were +(49.22 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 18.25) PD at near and +(47.00 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 18.53) PD at distance. After treatment, based on the measured deviation, total motor success was 95.00% (38/40) at near and 90.00% (36/40) at distance. Following treatment, 94.59% (35/37) of patients with ACE exhibited fusion, 86.84% (33/38) had near stereopsis, and 72.97% (27/37) had distance stereopsis. The motor and sensory success rates were not significantly different between the BTX-A and surgery groups. There were no statistically significant differences in motor outcomes or sensory outcomes among the three subtypes of ACE (all <i>P</i> <math><mo>></mo></math> 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, type II was the most common clinical classification for ACE. Favorable outcomes could be achieved with both BTX-A injection and surgery. There was no difference in motor or sensory outcomes regardless of clinical classification. BTX-A injection is minimally invasive, allows early intervention, and may be the preferred approach for managing ACE in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":16586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","volume":"20 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12320468/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v20.14661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate and compare the clinical features and efficacy of botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) injection versus surgery in acute-onset concomitant esotropia (ACE) in children.

Methods: This retrospective comparative clinical study was conducted on 40 children with ACE. The patients were assigned to either the surgery group (n = 23) or the BTX-A group (n = 17). Successful motor outcomes were defined as residual esodeviation of < 5 prism diopters (PD), while successful sensory outcomes were defined as the presence of any evidence of sensory fusion or stereopsis.

Results: The average treatment age in this study was 7.02 ± 3.72 years in the BTX-A group and 6.41 ± 2.83 years in the surgery group. There were 5 cases of type I (12.50%), 26 cases of type II (65.00%), and 9 cases of type III (22.50%) for ACE. The deviation before treatment was +(41.35 ± 16.90) PD at near and +(39.71 ± 14.94) PD at distance in the BTX-A group. In the surgery group, the results were +(49.22 ± 18.25) PD at near and +(47.00 ± 18.53) PD at distance. After treatment, based on the measured deviation, total motor success was 95.00% (38/40) at near and 90.00% (36/40) at distance. Following treatment, 94.59% (35/37) of patients with ACE exhibited fusion, 86.84% (33/38) had near stereopsis, and 72.97% (27/37) had distance stereopsis. The motor and sensory success rates were not significantly different between the BTX-A and surgery groups. There were no statistically significant differences in motor outcomes or sensory outcomes among the three subtypes of ACE (all P > 0.05).

Conclusion: In our study, type II was the most common clinical classification for ACE. Favorable outcomes could be achieved with both BTX-A injection and surgery. There was no difference in motor or sensory outcomes regardless of clinical classification. BTX-A injection is minimally invasive, allows early intervention, and may be the preferred approach for managing ACE in children.

儿童急性并发性内斜视:临床特征和治疗结果的比较。
目的:评价和比较肉毒毒素A (BTX-A)注射与手术治疗儿童急性伴发性内斜视(ACE)的临床特点和疗效。方法:对40例ACE患儿进行回顾性比较临床研究。将患者分为手术组(n = 23)和BTX-A组(n = 17)。成功的运动结果被定义为5棱镜屈光度的残余内偏差(PD),而成功的感觉结果被定义为存在任何感觉融合或立体视觉的证据。结果:BTX-A组患者平均治疗年龄为7.02±3.72岁,手术组患者平均治疗年龄为6.41±2.83岁。ACEⅰ型5例(12.50%),ⅱ型26例(65.00%),ⅲ型9例(22.50%)。BTX-A组治疗前近距离PD偏差为+(41.35±16.90)PD,远距离PD偏差为+(39.71±14.94)PD。手术组近距离PD +(49.22±18.25),远距离PD +(47.00±18.53)。治疗后,根据测量偏差,近距离运动成功率为95.00%(38/40),远距离运动成功率为90.00%(36/40)。治疗后,94.59%(35/37)的ACE患者表现为融合,86.84%(33/38)的ACE患者表现为近立体视,72.97%(27/37)的ACE患者表现为远立体视。运动和感觉成功率在BTX-A组和手术组之间无显著差异。三种ACE亚型患者的运动结局和感觉结局比较,差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:在我们的研究中,II型是ACE最常见的临床分型。BTX-A注射和手术均可获得良好的结果。无论临床分类如何,运动或感觉结果均无差异。BTX-A注射是微创的,允许早期干预,可能是治疗儿童ACE的首选方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信