Patient compliance with braces vs. Invisalign®: a secondary data analysis from a randomized clinical trial.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of Applied Oral Science Pub Date : 2025-08-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1678-7757-2025-0179
Graziela Hernandes Volpato, Paula Vanessa Pedron Oltramari, Renata Rodrigues de Almeida-Pedrin, Thais Maria Freire Fernandes, Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida, Gabriela Utrago, João Poiani, Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira Conti
{"title":"Patient compliance with braces vs. Invisalign®: a secondary data analysis from a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Graziela Hernandes Volpato, Paula Vanessa Pedron Oltramari, Renata Rodrigues de Almeida-Pedrin, Thais Maria Freire Fernandes, Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida, Gabriela Utrago, João Poiani, Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira Conti","doi":"10.1590/1678-7757-2025-0179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The success of orthodontic treatment depends on several factors that may influence the desired outcome, such as patient motivation and cooperation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compared patient compliance during the first year of orthodontic treatment using aligners and conventional fixed appliances.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The sample included 39 participants (22.1±4.62 years, 25 males, 14 females) randomized into two groups: orthodontic aligners (OA, 20 patients, 23.7±5.6 years, 12 males, 8 females) and fixed appliances (FA, 19 patients, 20.5±4.5 years, 12 males, 7 females). Patient compliance was measured using the Orthodontic Patient Cooperation Scale (OPCS) composed of 10 questions related to attitudes and attendance of patients in relation to treatment. The questionnaire was applied at three different points: at 3 months (T1), at 6 months (T2), and at 12 months (T3) of treatment. The psychosocial profile of the patients was assessed using the anxiety (IDATE) and stress (PSS-14) questionnaires. Both groups were comparable in age, gender and psychosocial profile. Compliance comparisons between groups at T1, T2 and T3, as well as between genders, were performed using the Mann-Whitney test. Comparison between T1, T2 and T3 were performed using the Friedman test. The correlation between age and compliance scores was assessed using the Spearman's correlation coefficient. The psychosocial profile was analyzed using the Independent t-test. All tests considered p<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The type of appliance (OA or FA) and the time of assessment did not significantly influence patient compliance. The age and gender of patients were not correlated with their degree of compliance. Patient compliance was similar in the first 12 months of treatment, regardless of the protocol used, the patient's gender and age.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The level of patient compliance with orthodontic treatment was not influenced by the type of appliance (conventional fixed appliances or aligners), nor by the patient's age or gender.</p>","PeriodicalId":15133,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Oral Science","volume":"33 ","pages":"e20250179"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Oral Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2025-0179","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The success of orthodontic treatment depends on several factors that may influence the desired outcome, such as patient motivation and cooperation.

Objective: This study compared patient compliance during the first year of orthodontic treatment using aligners and conventional fixed appliances.

Methodology: The sample included 39 participants (22.1±4.62 years, 25 males, 14 females) randomized into two groups: orthodontic aligners (OA, 20 patients, 23.7±5.6 years, 12 males, 8 females) and fixed appliances (FA, 19 patients, 20.5±4.5 years, 12 males, 7 females). Patient compliance was measured using the Orthodontic Patient Cooperation Scale (OPCS) composed of 10 questions related to attitudes and attendance of patients in relation to treatment. The questionnaire was applied at three different points: at 3 months (T1), at 6 months (T2), and at 12 months (T3) of treatment. The psychosocial profile of the patients was assessed using the anxiety (IDATE) and stress (PSS-14) questionnaires. Both groups were comparable in age, gender and psychosocial profile. Compliance comparisons between groups at T1, T2 and T3, as well as between genders, were performed using the Mann-Whitney test. Comparison between T1, T2 and T3 were performed using the Friedman test. The correlation between age and compliance scores was assessed using the Spearman's correlation coefficient. The psychosocial profile was analyzed using the Independent t-test. All tests considered p<0.05.

Results: The type of appliance (OA or FA) and the time of assessment did not significantly influence patient compliance. The age and gender of patients were not correlated with their degree of compliance. Patient compliance was similar in the first 12 months of treatment, regardless of the protocol used, the patient's gender and age.

Conclusions: The level of patient compliance with orthodontic treatment was not influenced by the type of appliance (conventional fixed appliances or aligners), nor by the patient's age or gender.

患者对牙套的依从性与Invisalign®:一项随机临床试验的二次数据分析
正畸治疗的成功取决于几个可能影响预期结果的因素,如患者的动机和合作。目的:本研究比较了使用矫正器和传统固定矫治器的患者第一年的依从性。方法:39例受试者(22.1±4.62岁,男25例,女14例)随机分为正畸矫正器组(OA组,20例,23.7±5.6岁,男12例,女8例)和固定矫治器组(FA组,19例,20.5±4.5岁,男12例,女7例)。采用正畸患者合作量表(OPCS)测量患者依从性,该量表由10个问题组成,涉及患者对治疗的态度和出勤率。在治疗3个月(T1)、6个月(T2)和12个月(T3)三个不同的时间点进行问卷调查。使用焦虑(IDATE)和压力(PSS-14)问卷对患者的社会心理状况进行评估。两组在年龄、性别和社会心理方面具有可比性。采用Mann-Whitney检验对T1、T2、T3组间及性别间依从性进行比较。T1、T2和T3的比较采用Friedman检验。使用Spearman相关系数评估年龄与依从性评分之间的相关性。使用独立t检验分析心理社会特征。结果:矫治器类型(OA或FA)和评估时间对患者依从性没有显著影响。患者的年龄和性别与依从程度无关。无论使用何种治疗方案、患者的性别和年龄,患者在治疗的前12个月的依从性相似。结论:患者对正畸治疗的依从性不受矫治器类型(传统固定矫治器或矫正器)、患者年龄和性别的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Oral Science
Journal of Applied Oral Science 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Oral Science is committed in publishing the scientific and technologic advances achieved by the dental community, according to the quality indicators and peer reviewed material, with the objective of assuring its acceptability at the local, regional, national and international levels. The primary goal of The Journal of Applied Oral Science is to publish the outcomes of original investigations as well as invited case reports and invited reviews in the field of Dentistry and related areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信