Intra-arterial thrombolysis after successful endovascular reperfusion for large vessel occlusion stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized seven controlled trials.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Ali Mortezaei, Nadir Al-Saidi, Yan Lin Li, Vivek S Yedavalli, Robert W Regenhardt, Adam A Dmytriw
{"title":"Intra-arterial thrombolysis after successful endovascular reperfusion for large vessel occlusion stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized seven controlled trials.","authors":"Ali Mortezaei, Nadir Al-Saidi, Yan Lin Li, Vivek S Yedavalli, Robert W Regenhardt, Adam A Dmytriw","doi":"10.1177/15910199251367556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAlthough thrombectomy is the standard of care for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large-vessel occlusion (LVO), many patients fail to achieve disability-free recovery, highlighting the need for adjunctive therapy to improve outcomes.PurposeThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) and placebo following the successful recanalization of AIS-LVO.Materials and MethodsA systematic literature review of four databases was performed. Categorical and continuous outcomes were calculated using Risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), respectively. Any potential heterogeneity was resolved through leave-one-out influence analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB2 tool. Our study was not registered in PROSPERO. The primary analysis included three published RCTs; four additional trials, including posterior circulation or preliminary data, were incorporated in sensitivity analyses to validate robustness.ResultsA total of three trials with enrolled patients 1187 were included in the study. Four additional trials were also included only for sensitivity analysis. The findings showed that patients who received IAT had a significantly higher rate of 90-day functional excellence (RR = 1.15, 95%CI = 1.01-1.3, <i>P</i> = .032, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.0%) than the control group. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding functional independence, mortality, symptomatic or any intracranial hemorrhage, and total adverse events. There was a significantly higher functional excellence rate in IAT group compared with control group in studies that included patients with expanded thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score (eTICI) score of 2b-3 versus 2c-3 (RR = 1.5, 95%CI = 1.23-1.82 <i>P</i> = .016, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.0%) and female patients derived more benefit from IAT than placebo (RR = 1.42, 95%CI = 1.15-1.75, <i>P</i> = .001, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.0%). Notably, there was no significant heterogeneity across any primary and secondary outcomes.ConclusionIn patients with AIS-LVO presenting within 24 h of time last seen well who achieved successful endovascular recanalization, IAT significantly improved the likelihood of functional excellence at three months without hemorrhagic risk. Further research is warranted to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251367556"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12350307/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251367556","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundAlthough thrombectomy is the standard of care for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large-vessel occlusion (LVO), many patients fail to achieve disability-free recovery, highlighting the need for adjunctive therapy to improve outcomes.PurposeThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) and placebo following the successful recanalization of AIS-LVO.Materials and MethodsA systematic literature review of four databases was performed. Categorical and continuous outcomes were calculated using Risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), respectively. Any potential heterogeneity was resolved through leave-one-out influence analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB2 tool. Our study was not registered in PROSPERO. The primary analysis included three published RCTs; four additional trials, including posterior circulation or preliminary data, were incorporated in sensitivity analyses to validate robustness.ResultsA total of three trials with enrolled patients 1187 were included in the study. Four additional trials were also included only for sensitivity analysis. The findings showed that patients who received IAT had a significantly higher rate of 90-day functional excellence (RR = 1.15, 95%CI = 1.01-1.3, P = .032, I2 = 0.0%) than the control group. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding functional independence, mortality, symptomatic or any intracranial hemorrhage, and total adverse events. There was a significantly higher functional excellence rate in IAT group compared with control group in studies that included patients with expanded thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score (eTICI) score of 2b-3 versus 2c-3 (RR = 1.5, 95%CI = 1.23-1.82 P = .016, I2 = 0.0%) and female patients derived more benefit from IAT than placebo (RR = 1.42, 95%CI = 1.15-1.75, P = .001, I2 = 0.0%). Notably, there was no significant heterogeneity across any primary and secondary outcomes.ConclusionIn patients with AIS-LVO presenting within 24 h of time last seen well who achieved successful endovascular recanalization, IAT significantly improved the likelihood of functional excellence at three months without hemorrhagic risk. Further research is warranted to validate these findings.

血管内再灌注成功后动脉内溶栓治疗大血管闭塞性卒中:一项随机7项对照试验的meta分析。
尽管血栓切除术是大血管闭塞(LVO)引起的急性缺血性卒中(AIS)的标准治疗方法,但许多患者未能实现无残疾康复,这表明需要辅助治疗来改善预后。目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在比较AIS-LVO再通成功后动脉内溶栓(IAT)和安慰剂。材料与方法对四个数据库进行系统的文献综述。分类结局和连续结局分别使用95%置信区间的风险比(rr)和平均差异(md)计算。通过留一影响分析解决了任何潜在的异质性。使用RoB2工具评估偏倚风险。我们的研究没有在普洛斯彼罗登记。主要分析包括三个已发表的随机对照试验;另外四项试验,包括后循环或初步数据,纳入敏感性分析以验证稳健性。结果共纳入3项试验,纳入患者1187例。另外4个试验也被纳入敏感性分析。结果显示,接受IAT治疗的患者90天功能卓越率显著高于对照组(RR = 1.15, 95%CI = 1.01-1.3, P =。032, I2 = 0.0%)高于对照组。两组在功能独立性、死亡率、症状性或任何颅内出血以及总不良事件方面无显著差异。在纳入扩张性溶栓脑梗死评分(eTICI)为2b-3与2c-3的患者的研究中,IAT组功能优优率明显高于对照组(RR = 1.5, 95%CI = 1.23-1.82 P =)。016, I2 = 0.0%),女性患者从IAT中获得的获益多于安慰剂(RR = 1.42, 95%CI = 1.15-1.75, P =。001, i2 = 0.0%)。值得注意的是,在主要和次要结局中没有显著的异质性。结论在24小时内出现的AIS-LVO患者,血管内再通成功,IAT显著提高了功能卓越的可能性,3个月无出血风险。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信