Elissa S Y Aeng, Peggy Hung, Alfie Chung, Deborah Heidary, Aaron M Tejani
{"title":"Breathing easier: removing maintenance inhalers from hospital wardstock for cost savings and waste reduction.","authors":"Elissa S Y Aeng, Peggy Hung, Alfie Chung, Deborah Heidary, Aaron M Tejani","doi":"10.1093/ijpp/riaf047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maintenance inhalers are commonly used for long-term management of respiratory conditions. These multidose devices contain several weeks of medication, are expensive, and have significant global emissions impact. As these medications are not useful for managing acute symptoms, it was questioned whether keeping these inhalers in hospital wardstock locations may contribute to inhaler wastage.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if removal of maintenance inhalers from wardstock would reduce the number of inhalers dispensed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective quality improvement study examining medication utilization data within the Fraser Health Authority. An inventory report was run to determine where maintenance inhalers were located to select hospital sites to target. Maintenance inhalers were removed from wardstock at chosen sites and utilization data from 6 months prior to removal were compared to 6 months post-removal. Outcomes reported were change in number of inhalers dispensed, change in number of inhalers dispensed per active-order-day, change in expenditure, and change in carbon emissions. Informal assessments on workload and access were made during the 6-month follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>Within 6 months after maintenance inhalers were removed from wardstock at two hospitals, 119 fewer inhalers and 43 fewer dry powder inhaler capsules were dispensed, representing $4541 in savings and a reduction in carbon emissions equivalent to 6,770.5 km driven by a typical gasoline car-enough to drive across Canada from the Pacific to the Atlantic coast. No indications of delayed access or increased workload were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Routine reassessments of wardstock supply of maintenance inhalers or medications that are not acutely needed may be useful in alignment with formulary budget and planetary health.</p>","PeriodicalId":14284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"521-525"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riaf047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Maintenance inhalers are commonly used for long-term management of respiratory conditions. These multidose devices contain several weeks of medication, are expensive, and have significant global emissions impact. As these medications are not useful for managing acute symptoms, it was questioned whether keeping these inhalers in hospital wardstock locations may contribute to inhaler wastage.
Objective: To determine if removal of maintenance inhalers from wardstock would reduce the number of inhalers dispensed.
Methods: This was a prospective quality improvement study examining medication utilization data within the Fraser Health Authority. An inventory report was run to determine where maintenance inhalers were located to select hospital sites to target. Maintenance inhalers were removed from wardstock at chosen sites and utilization data from 6 months prior to removal were compared to 6 months post-removal. Outcomes reported were change in number of inhalers dispensed, change in number of inhalers dispensed per active-order-day, change in expenditure, and change in carbon emissions. Informal assessments on workload and access were made during the 6-month follow-up period.
Key findings: Within 6 months after maintenance inhalers were removed from wardstock at two hospitals, 119 fewer inhalers and 43 fewer dry powder inhaler capsules were dispensed, representing $4541 in savings and a reduction in carbon emissions equivalent to 6,770.5 km driven by a typical gasoline car-enough to drive across Canada from the Pacific to the Atlantic coast. No indications of delayed access or increased workload were reported.
Conclusions: Routine reassessments of wardstock supply of maintenance inhalers or medications that are not acutely needed may be useful in alignment with formulary budget and planetary health.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Pharmacy Practice (IJPP) is a Medline-indexed, peer reviewed, international journal. It is one of the leading journals publishing health services research in the context of pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, medicines and medicines management. Regular sections in the journal include, editorials, literature reviews, original research, personal opinion and short communications. Topics covered include: medicines utilisation, medicine management, medicines distribution, supply and administration, pharmaceutical services, professional and patient/lay perspectives, public health (including, e.g. health promotion, needs assessment, health protection) evidence based practice, pharmacy education. Methods include both evaluative and exploratory work including, randomised controlled trials, surveys, epidemiological approaches, case studies, observational studies, and qualitative methods such as interviews and focus groups. Application of methods drawn from other disciplines e.g. psychology, health economics, morbidity are especially welcome as are developments of new methodologies.