Computational modelling reveals neurobiological contributions to static and dynamic functional connectivity patterns.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-07-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fncom.2025.1525785
Linnea Hoheisel, Hannah Hacker, Gereon R Fink, Silvia Daun, Joseph Kambeitz
{"title":"Computational modelling reveals neurobiological contributions to static and dynamic functional connectivity patterns.","authors":"Linnea Hoheisel, Hannah Hacker, Gereon R Fink, Silvia Daun, Joseph Kambeitz","doi":"10.3389/fncom.2025.1525785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Functional connectivity (FC) is a widely used indicator of brain function in health and disease, yet its neurobiological underpinnings still need to be firmly established. Recent advances in computational modelling allow us to investigate the relationship of both static FC (sFC) and dynamic FC (dFC) with neurobiology non-invasively. In this study, we modelled the brain activity of 200 healthy individuals based on empirical resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data. Simulations were conducted using a group-averaged structural connectome and four parameters guiding global integration and local excitation-inhibition balance: (i) G, a global coupling scaling parameter; (ii) J <sub><i>i</i></sub> , an inhibitory coupling parameter; (iii) J <sub><i>N</i></sub> , the excitatory NMDA synaptic coupling parameter; and (iv) w <sub><i>p</i></sub> , the excitatory population recurrence weight. For each individual, we optimised the parameters to replicate empirical sFC and temporal correlation (TC). We analysed associations between brain-wide sFC and TC features with optimal model parameters and fits with a univariate correlation approach and multivariate prediction models. In addition, we used a group-average perturbation approach to investigate the effect of coupling in each region on overall network connectivity. Our models could replicate empirical sFC and TC but not the FC variance or node cohesion (NC). Both fits and parameters exhibited strong associations with brain connectivity. G correlated positively and J <sub><i>N</i></sub> negatively with a range of static and dynamic FC features (|<i>r</i>| > 0.2, p <sub><i>FDR</i></sub> < 0.05). TC fit correlated negatively, and sFC fit positively with static and dynamic FC features. TC features were predictive of TC fit, sFC features of sFC fit (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> > 0.5). Perturbation analysis revealed that the sFC fit was most impacted by coupling changes in the left paracentral gyrus (Δr = 0.07), TC fit by alterations in the left pars triangularis (Δr = 0.24). Our findings indicate that neurobiological characteristics are associated with individual variability in sFC and dFC, and that sFC and dFC are shaped by small sets of distinct regions. By modelling both sFC and dFC, we provide new evidence of the role of neurophysiological characteristics in establishing brain network configurations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12363,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience","volume":"19 ","pages":"1525785"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12339445/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2025.1525785","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Functional connectivity (FC) is a widely used indicator of brain function in health and disease, yet its neurobiological underpinnings still need to be firmly established. Recent advances in computational modelling allow us to investigate the relationship of both static FC (sFC) and dynamic FC (dFC) with neurobiology non-invasively. In this study, we modelled the brain activity of 200 healthy individuals based on empirical resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data. Simulations were conducted using a group-averaged structural connectome and four parameters guiding global integration and local excitation-inhibition balance: (i) G, a global coupling scaling parameter; (ii) J i , an inhibitory coupling parameter; (iii) J N , the excitatory NMDA synaptic coupling parameter; and (iv) w p , the excitatory population recurrence weight. For each individual, we optimised the parameters to replicate empirical sFC and temporal correlation (TC). We analysed associations between brain-wide sFC and TC features with optimal model parameters and fits with a univariate correlation approach and multivariate prediction models. In addition, we used a group-average perturbation approach to investigate the effect of coupling in each region on overall network connectivity. Our models could replicate empirical sFC and TC but not the FC variance or node cohesion (NC). Both fits and parameters exhibited strong associations with brain connectivity. G correlated positively and J N negatively with a range of static and dynamic FC features (|r| > 0.2, p FDR < 0.05). TC fit correlated negatively, and sFC fit positively with static and dynamic FC features. TC features were predictive of TC fit, sFC features of sFC fit (R 2 > 0.5). Perturbation analysis revealed that the sFC fit was most impacted by coupling changes in the left paracentral gyrus (Δr = 0.07), TC fit by alterations in the left pars triangularis (Δr = 0.24). Our findings indicate that neurobiological characteristics are associated with individual variability in sFC and dFC, and that sFC and dFC are shaped by small sets of distinct regions. By modelling both sFC and dFC, we provide new evidence of the role of neurophysiological characteristics in establishing brain network configurations.

计算模型揭示了静态和动态功能连接模式的神经生物学贡献。
功能连接(FC)是一种广泛使用的健康和疾病脑功能指标,但其神经生物学基础仍需牢固建立。计算模型的最新进展使我们能够无创地研究静态FC (sFC)和动态FC (dFC)与神经生物学的关系。在这项研究中,我们基于经验静息状态功能磁共振成像(fMRI)和弥散张量成像(DTI)数据对200名健康个体的大脑活动进行了建模。利用群平均结构连接体和指导全局集成和局部兴奋-抑制平衡的四个参数进行模拟:(i)全局耦合标度参数G;(ii) J i,抑制耦合参数;(iii) jn,兴奋性NMDA突触耦合参数;(iv) wp为兴奋性总体复发权值。对于每个个体,我们优化了参数以复制经验sFC和时间相关性(TC)。我们用最优模型参数分析了全脑sFC和TC特征之间的关系,并采用单变量相关方法和多变量预测模型进行拟合。此外,我们使用群体平均摄动方法来研究每个区域的耦合对整体网络连通性的影响。我们的模型可以复制经验sFC和TC,但不能复制FC方差或节点内聚(NC)。拟合和参数都显示出与大脑连通性的强烈关联。G与一系列静态和动态FC特征呈正相关,jn呈负相关(|r| > 0.2, p FDR < 0.05)。静态和动态FC特征与TC拟合呈负相关,与sFC拟合呈正相关。TC特征对TC拟合有预测作用,sFC特征对sFC拟合有预测作用(R 2 bb0 0.5)。摄动分析显示,sFC拟合受左侧中央旁回耦合变化的影响最大(Δr = 0.07), TC拟合受左侧三角部变化的影响最大(Δr = 0.24)。我们的研究结果表明,神经生物学特征与sFC和dFC的个体差异有关,sFC和dFC由一小组不同的区域形成。通过模拟sFC和dFC,我们为神经生理特征在建立脑网络配置中的作用提供了新的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
166
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience is a first-tier electronic journal devoted to promoting theoretical modeling of brain function and fostering interdisciplinary interactions between theoretical and experimental neuroscience. Progress in understanding the amazing capabilities of the brain is still limited, and we believe that it will only come with deep theoretical thinking and mutually stimulating cooperation between different disciplines and approaches. We therefore invite original contributions on a wide range of topics that present the fruits of such cooperation, or provide stimuli for future alliances. We aim to provide an interactive forum for cutting-edge theoretical studies of the nervous system, and for promulgating the best theoretical research to the broader neuroscience community. Models of all styles and at all levels are welcome, from biophysically motivated realistic simulations of neurons and synapses to high-level abstract models of inference and decision making. While the journal is primarily focused on theoretically based and driven research, we welcome experimental studies that validate and test theoretical conclusions. Also: comp neuro
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信