Investigation of the efficacy and safety of endoscopic wide band resection in the treatment of colorectal polyps.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Ufuk Kutluana
{"title":"Investigation of the efficacy and safety of endoscopic wide band resection in the treatment of colorectal polyps.","authors":"Ufuk Kutluana","doi":"10.1097/MEG.0000000000003023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and studys purpose: </strong>Endoscopic band ligation is commonly used in gastroenterology but limited in colorectal polyps (CRPs) treatment due to narrow cap diameters. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are effective but carry higher bleeding risks in patients with concomitant comorbidities. Considering the narrowest part of the colon, the rectosigmoid junction measures approximately 2.5 cm, we developed a custom endoscopic wide band resection (EWBR) cap with a 24 mm external diameter for CRPs <25 mm, particularly in high-risk patients. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of EWBR.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We prospectively collected and analyzed the outcomes of 32 patients with CRPs treated using EWBR and 34 matched patients treated with ESD between November 2020 and December 2024.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>The groups were similar in age, gender, and lesion size (all P  > 0.05). Comorbidities were significantly more common in the EWBR group (78.6 vs. 8.8%; P  < 0.001). EWBR was associated with shorter procedure time (14.2 vs. 35 min; P  < 0.001), lower rates of prolonged bleeding that extended the procedure (3.1 vs. 52.9%; P  < 0.001), smaller hemoglobin decreases (0.55 vs. 1.17 g/dl; P  = 0.002), and shorter hospital stays (1.03 vs. 2.11 days; P  = 0.001). Only one patient (3.1%) in the EWBR group developed asymptomatic minor strictures. No recurrences were observed in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EWBR is a safe and effective alternative for CRPs <25 mm, especially in high-risk patients. It reduces procedure time, bleeding, and hospital stay, making it a promising therapeutic option.</p>","PeriodicalId":11999,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"1213-1218"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000003023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and studys purpose: Endoscopic band ligation is commonly used in gastroenterology but limited in colorectal polyps (CRPs) treatment due to narrow cap diameters. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are effective but carry higher bleeding risks in patients with concomitant comorbidities. Considering the narrowest part of the colon, the rectosigmoid junction measures approximately 2.5 cm, we developed a custom endoscopic wide band resection (EWBR) cap with a 24 mm external diameter for CRPs <25 mm, particularly in high-risk patients. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of EWBR.

Patients and methods: We prospectively collected and analyzed the outcomes of 32 patients with CRPs treated using EWBR and 34 matched patients treated with ESD between November 2020 and December 2024.

Main results: The groups were similar in age, gender, and lesion size (all P  > 0.05). Comorbidities were significantly more common in the EWBR group (78.6 vs. 8.8%; P  < 0.001). EWBR was associated with shorter procedure time (14.2 vs. 35 min; P  < 0.001), lower rates of prolonged bleeding that extended the procedure (3.1 vs. 52.9%; P  < 0.001), smaller hemoglobin decreases (0.55 vs. 1.17 g/dl; P  = 0.002), and shorter hospital stays (1.03 vs. 2.11 days; P  = 0.001). Only one patient (3.1%) in the EWBR group developed asymptomatic minor strictures. No recurrences were observed in either group.

Conclusion: EWBR is a safe and effective alternative for CRPs <25 mm, especially in high-risk patients. It reduces procedure time, bleeding, and hospital stay, making it a promising therapeutic option.

内镜下宽带切除术治疗结直肠息肉的疗效及安全性探讨。
背景和研究目的:内镜下带结扎术常用于胃肠病学,但由于帽直径较窄,在结肠直肠息肉(CRPs)治疗中受到限制。内镜下粘膜切除术和内镜下粘膜剥离术(ESD)是有效的,但对伴有合并症的患者出血风险较高。考虑到结肠最窄的部分,直肠乙状结肠结约为2.5 cm,我们为CRPs患者开发了一种定制的内窥镜宽带切除(EWBR)帽,外径为24 mm。我们前瞻性地收集并分析了2020年11月至2024年12月期间使用EWBR治疗的32例CRPs患者和34例使用ESD治疗的匹配患者的结果。主要结果:两组患者年龄、性别、病变大小差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。合并症在EWBR组中更为常见(78.6 vs 8.8%;结论:EWBR是一种安全有效的CRPs替代方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
269
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology publishes papers reporting original clinical and scientific research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes three types of manuscript: in-depth reviews (by invitation only), full papers and case reports. Manuscripts submitted to the journal will be accepted on the understanding that the author has not previously submitted the paper to another journal or had the material published elsewhere. Authors are asked to disclose any affiliations, including financial, consultant, or institutional associations, that might lead to bias or a conflict of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信