Challenging assumptions: a tripartite assessment of medical quality, resource utilization, and equity concerns in pediatric telemedicine.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Motti Haimi, Ruslan Sergienko, Tzipi Hornik-Lurie, Dov Albukrek
{"title":"Challenging assumptions: a tripartite assessment of medical quality, resource utilization, and equity concerns in pediatric telemedicine.","authors":"Motti Haimi, Ruslan Sergienko, Tzipi Hornik-Lurie, Dov Albukrek","doi":"10.1186/s12911-025-03124-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abactstr: </strong>BACKGROUND: Telemedicine has expanded healthcare accessibility, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, evidence regarding its economic efficiency and clinical quality remains inconclusive, with some studies suggesting increased costs, service utilization, and inappropriate antibiotic prescribing compared to traditional care modalities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated pediatric telemedicine services across three dimensions: clinical outcomes (antibiotic prescribing patterns), resource utilization implications (healthcare utilization and emergency department visits), and equity considerations (sociodemographic distribution of services).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study analysis of 1,500 children under 19 years within Israel's Clalit Health Services (Shron-Shomron District) from January 2021 to January 2022. Participants were randomly sampled from three groups based on their telemedicine utilization patterns: in-person primary care physician (PCP) visits only (n = 500); PCP plus phone/video telemedicine (n = 500); and PCP plus phone/video plus Tyto device telemedicine (n = 500). These children were classified as discrete groups, not only as solitary visits. We assessed emergency department (ED) admission rates, antibiotic prescription frequencies for common pediatric conditions, and sociodemographic characteristics across the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 21,968 visits revealed striking socioeconomic disparities in telemedicine utilization. While 58.1% of all participants had high socioeconomic status (SES), this increased to 68.6% among Tyto device users. Conversely, low-SES patients comprised 26.4% of in-person-only visits but only 3% of Tyto users. ED admission rates for all groups combined were 4.0%, 1.6% for the \"PCP only\" group, 5.4% for the \"PCP + phone/video\" group (12% after phone/video visits), and 3.6% for the \"PCP + phone/video + Tyto\" group (4.1% after Tyto only). Antibiotic prescribing rates were similarly divergent: mean rates of antibiotic prescriptions after PCP visits were 10.3%, after telephone/video visits were 16.8%, and after Tyto visits were 21.4% (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis confirmed those findings and demonstrated higher ED utilization and antibiotic prescribing among low-SES patients and those in remote locations, independent of visit type.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings challenge prevailing assumptions about telemedicine benefits, revealing unexpected associations between telemedicine services and higher ED utilization and antibiotic prescribing compared to traditional care, particularly among vulnerable populations. These associations may reflect complex interactions between patient characteristics, provider behavior, and care modalities that warrant further investigation. Healthcare systems should reconsider the implementation of telemedicine services to ensure they deliver on promises of expanded access while maintaining quality, appropriate resource utilization, and equitable distribution of benefits across socioeconomic groups.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"25 1","pages":"303"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12344953/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-03124-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abactstr: BACKGROUND: Telemedicine has expanded healthcare accessibility, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, evidence regarding its economic efficiency and clinical quality remains inconclusive, with some studies suggesting increased costs, service utilization, and inappropriate antibiotic prescribing compared to traditional care modalities.

Objective: This study evaluated pediatric telemedicine services across three dimensions: clinical outcomes (antibiotic prescribing patterns), resource utilization implications (healthcare utilization and emergency department visits), and equity considerations (sociodemographic distribution of services).

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study analysis of 1,500 children under 19 years within Israel's Clalit Health Services (Shron-Shomron District) from January 2021 to January 2022. Participants were randomly sampled from three groups based on their telemedicine utilization patterns: in-person primary care physician (PCP) visits only (n = 500); PCP plus phone/video telemedicine (n = 500); and PCP plus phone/video plus Tyto device telemedicine (n = 500). These children were classified as discrete groups, not only as solitary visits. We assessed emergency department (ED) admission rates, antibiotic prescription frequencies for common pediatric conditions, and sociodemographic characteristics across the groups.

Results: Analysis of 21,968 visits revealed striking socioeconomic disparities in telemedicine utilization. While 58.1% of all participants had high socioeconomic status (SES), this increased to 68.6% among Tyto device users. Conversely, low-SES patients comprised 26.4% of in-person-only visits but only 3% of Tyto users. ED admission rates for all groups combined were 4.0%, 1.6% for the "PCP only" group, 5.4% for the "PCP + phone/video" group (12% after phone/video visits), and 3.6% for the "PCP + phone/video + Tyto" group (4.1% after Tyto only). Antibiotic prescribing rates were similarly divergent: mean rates of antibiotic prescriptions after PCP visits were 10.3%, after telephone/video visits were 16.8%, and after Tyto visits were 21.4% (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis confirmed those findings and demonstrated higher ED utilization and antibiotic prescribing among low-SES patients and those in remote locations, independent of visit type.

Conclusions: Our findings challenge prevailing assumptions about telemedicine benefits, revealing unexpected associations between telemedicine services and higher ED utilization and antibiotic prescribing compared to traditional care, particularly among vulnerable populations. These associations may reflect complex interactions between patient characteristics, provider behavior, and care modalities that warrant further investigation. Healthcare systems should reconsider the implementation of telemedicine services to ensure they deliver on promises of expanded access while maintaining quality, appropriate resource utilization, and equitable distribution of benefits across socioeconomic groups.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

挑战假设:在儿科远程医疗医疗质量,资源利用和公平问题的三方评估。
背景:远程医疗扩大了医疗可及性,特别是在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间。然而,关于其经济效率和临床质量的证据仍然不确定,一些研究表明,与传统护理模式相比,成本、服务利用率和抗生素处方不当增加。目的:本研究从三个方面评估儿科远程医疗服务:临床结果(抗生素处方模式)、资源利用影响(医疗保健利用和急诊就诊)和公平考虑(服务的社会人口分布)。方法:我们对2021年1月至2022年1月在以色列Clalit卫生服务中心(Shron-Shomron区)的1500名19岁以下儿童进行了回顾性队列研究分析。根据远程医疗使用模式,从三组随机抽取参与者:仅亲自访问初级保健医生(PCP) (n = 500);PCP加电话/视频远程医疗(n = 500);PCP +电话/视频+ Tyto设备远程医疗(n = 500)。这些孩子被分类为离散组,而不仅仅是单独访问。我们评估了各组的急诊科(ED)入院率、常见儿科疾病的抗生素处方频率和社会人口学特征。结果:对21968次就诊的分析揭示了远程医疗利用的显著社会经济差异。虽然58.1%的参与者具有较高的社会经济地位(SES),但Tyto设备用户的这一比例增加到68.6%。相反,低社会经济地位患者占亲自就诊人数的26.4%,但Tyto用户只占3%。所有组的ED入院率为4.0%,“仅PCP”组为1.6%,“PCP +电话/视频”组为5.4%(电话/视频访问后为12%),“PCP +电话/视频+ Tyto”组为3.6%(仅Tyto后为4.1%)。抗生素处方率同样存在差异:PCP就诊后的平均抗生素处方率为10.3%,电话/视频就诊后的平均抗生素处方率为16.8%,Tyto就诊后的平均抗生素处方率为21.4% (p)结论:我们的研究结果挑战了关于远程医疗效益的普遍假设,揭示了与传统护理相比,远程医疗服务与更高的ED使用率和抗生素处方之间意想不到的关联,特别是在弱势群体中。这些关联可能反映了患者特征、提供者行为和护理模式之间复杂的相互作用,值得进一步研究。卫生保健系统应重新考虑远程医疗服务的实施,以确保它们在保证质量、适当的资源利用和在社会经济群体之间公平分配利益的同时,兑现扩大访问的承诺。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信