Comparative efficacy of aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab on hard exudate resolution in diabetic macular edema.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Kangyeun Pak, Changki Yoon, Srinivas R Sadda
{"title":"Comparative efficacy of aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab on hard exudate resolution in diabetic macular edema.","authors":"Kangyeun Pak, Changki Yoon, Srinivas R Sadda","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjo.2025.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy of aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab for resolution of diabetic macular edema-associated hard exudates (HEs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Post hoc analysis of the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Protocol T trial.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Two hundred and forty-eight subjects with 84 eyes were treated with aflibercept, 71 eyes were treated with bevacizumab, and 93 eyes were treated with ranibizumab.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The volume of HEs was measured by automatically quantifying hyperreflective foci on optical coherence tomography volume scans using a deep-learning algorithm. HEs were quantified within the total macula (6 × 6 mm scan area), as well as separately within the central subfield (CSF), inner ring (IR), and outer ring (OR) of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study grid at baseline, 4, 12, 24, and 52 weeks (w) after treatment. The extent of HEs at baseline and the change over time were compared among the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline HEs in the total macula were 0.0211 ± 0.0275, 0.0215 ± 0.0266, and 0.0223 ± 0.0272 mm<sup>3</sup> for the aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab groups, respectively. At 1 year, HEs significantly decreased with aflibercept and ranibizumab in the total macula and in all subregions (CSF, OR, and IR), but they only decreased with evacizumab in the CSF. Over 1 year, the reduction in HEs was greater for aflibercept and ranibizumab than for bevacizumab within the total macular region, and anibizumab was superior to bevacizumab for the IR as well.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HEs decreased significantly with aflibercept and ranibizumab treatment over 1 year in all regions, but not with bevacizumab, highlighting the differential efficacy among agents in resolving HEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9606,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2025.07.009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab for resolution of diabetic macular edema-associated hard exudates (HEs).

Design: Post hoc analysis of the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Protocol T trial.

Participants: Two hundred and forty-eight subjects with 84 eyes were treated with aflibercept, 71 eyes were treated with bevacizumab, and 93 eyes were treated with ranibizumab.

Methods: The volume of HEs was measured by automatically quantifying hyperreflective foci on optical coherence tomography volume scans using a deep-learning algorithm. HEs were quantified within the total macula (6 × 6 mm scan area), as well as separately within the central subfield (CSF), inner ring (IR), and outer ring (OR) of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study grid at baseline, 4, 12, 24, and 52 weeks (w) after treatment. The extent of HEs at baseline and the change over time were compared among the groups.

Results: Baseline HEs in the total macula were 0.0211 ± 0.0275, 0.0215 ± 0.0266, and 0.0223 ± 0.0272 mm3 for the aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab groups, respectively. At 1 year, HEs significantly decreased with aflibercept and ranibizumab in the total macula and in all subregions (CSF, OR, and IR), but they only decreased with evacizumab in the CSF. Over 1 year, the reduction in HEs was greater for aflibercept and ranibizumab than for bevacizumab within the total macular region, and anibizumab was superior to bevacizumab for the IR as well.

Conclusions: HEs decreased significantly with aflibercept and ranibizumab treatment over 1 year in all regions, but not with bevacizumab, highlighting the differential efficacy among agents in resolving HEs.

阿非利塞普、贝伐单抗和雷尼单抗对糖尿病黄斑水肿硬渗出溶解的比较疗效。
目的:比较阿非利塞普、贝伐单抗和雷尼单抗治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿相关硬渗出(HEs)的疗效。设计:对糖尿病视网膜病变临床研究网络协议T试验进行事后分析。参与者:248名受试者,84只眼睛接受阿非利塞普治疗,71只眼睛接受贝伐单抗治疗,93只眼睛接受雷尼单抗治疗。方法:采用深度学习算法自动量化光学相干层析体积扫描的高反射聚焦,测量he体积。在治疗后基线、4周、12周、24周和52周(w),对总黄斑(6 × 6 mm扫描区域)以及早期治疗糖尿病视网膜病变研究网格的中心子野(CSF)、内环(IR)和外环(OR)内的he进行量化。比较各组在基线时的he程度和随时间的变化。结果:阿非利塞普组、贝伐单抗组和雷尼单抗组总黄斑基线HEs分别为0.0211±0.0275、0.0215±0.0266和0.0223±0.0272 mm3。1年后,阿非利塞普和雷尼单抗在总黄斑和所有亚区(脑脊液、OR和IR)中显著降低HEs,但仅在脑脊液中使用阿非利塞普和雷尼单抗降低HEs。在1年多的时间里,阿非利塞普和雷尼单抗比贝伐单抗在全黄斑区域的HEs降低幅度更大,而且阿尼单抗在IR方面也优于贝伐单抗。结论:在所有地区,阿非利西贝联合雷尼单抗治疗1年以上HEs均显著下降,但贝伐单抗治疗无显著下降,突出了不同药物在解决HEs方面的疗效差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
223
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Official journal of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society. The Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology (CJO) is the official journal of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society and is committed to timely publication of original, peer-reviewed ophthalmology and vision science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信