Predicting 30-day in-hospital mortality in ICU asthma patients: a retrospective machine learning study with external validation.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Yuanshuo Ge, Guangdong Wang, Tingting Liu, Wenwen Ji, Jiaolin Sun, Yaxin Zhang
{"title":"Predicting 30-day in-hospital mortality in ICU asthma patients: a retrospective machine learning study with external validation.","authors":"Yuanshuo Ge, Guangdong Wang, Tingting Liu, Wenwen Ji, Jiaolin Sun, Yaxin Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12890-025-03881-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Asthma-related mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU) remains poorly characterized, with no existing predictive models specifically designed for this high-risk population. This study aimed to develop and externally validate a machine learning-based model to predict 30-day in-hospital mortality among ICU patients with asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The model was developed using data from MIMIC-IV 2.2 and externally validated on a subset of MIMIC-IV 3.1. Clinical variables from the first 24 h of ICU admission were extracted. Feature selection was conducted using both LASSO regression and the Boruta algorithm. Seven machine learning algorithms were trained and evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis. The best-performing model was identified based on internal and external validation results. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were employed to interpret feature importance. The final model was deployed as an interactive web-based tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4385 ICU asthma patients were analyzed. The final XGBoost model, using 12 features, achieved the highest AUROC in both internal (0.83) and external (0.80) validation, and demonstrated the best calibration and net clinical benefit. SHAP analysis identified age, respiratory rate, RDW, urine output, and anion gap as top predictors. The model outperformed conventional ICU scores and is available as a web-based tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed and externally validated a robust prediction model for 30-day mortality in ICU patients with asthma. The model offers strong performance, interpretability, and clinical utility, supporting its use for real-time risk stratification and decision-making in critical care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"387"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12341201/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03881-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Asthma-related mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU) remains poorly characterized, with no existing predictive models specifically designed for this high-risk population. This study aimed to develop and externally validate a machine learning-based model to predict 30-day in-hospital mortality among ICU patients with asthma.

Methods: The model was developed using data from MIMIC-IV 2.2 and externally validated on a subset of MIMIC-IV 3.1. Clinical variables from the first 24 h of ICU admission were extracted. Feature selection was conducted using both LASSO regression and the Boruta algorithm. Seven machine learning algorithms were trained and evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis. The best-performing model was identified based on internal and external validation results. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were employed to interpret feature importance. The final model was deployed as an interactive web-based tool.

Results: A total of 4385 ICU asthma patients were analyzed. The final XGBoost model, using 12 features, achieved the highest AUROC in both internal (0.83) and external (0.80) validation, and demonstrated the best calibration and net clinical benefit. SHAP analysis identified age, respiratory rate, RDW, urine output, and anion gap as top predictors. The model outperformed conventional ICU scores and is available as a web-based tool.

Conclusions: We developed and externally validated a robust prediction model for 30-day mortality in ICU patients with asthma. The model offers strong performance, interpretability, and clinical utility, supporting its use for real-time risk stratification and decision-making in critical care settings.

预测ICU哮喘患者住院30天死亡率:一项具有外部验证的回顾性机器学习研究
背景:重症监护病房(ICU)哮喘相关死亡率的特征仍然很差,没有专门为这一高危人群设计的预测模型。本研究旨在开发并外部验证基于机器学习的模型,以预测ICU哮喘患者的30天住院死亡率。方法:利用MIMIC-IV 2.2的数据建立模型,并在MIMIC-IV 3.1的子集上进行外部验证。提取患者入院前24小时的临床变量。特征选择采用LASSO回归和Boruta算法。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、校准图和决策曲线分析对7种机器学习算法进行训练和评估。根据内部和外部验证结果确定了性能最佳的模型。采用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)解释特征重要性。最后的模型被部署为基于web的交互式工具。结果:共分析4385例ICU哮喘患者。最终的XGBoost模型使用了12个特征,在内部(0.83)和外部(0.80)验证中均获得了最高的AUROC,并展示了最佳的校准和净临床效益。SHAP分析确定年龄、呼吸频率、RDW、尿量和阴离子间隙是最重要的预测因素。该模型优于传统的ICU评分,可作为基于网络的工具使用。结论:我们开发并外部验证了ICU哮喘患者30天死亡率的稳健预测模型。该模型具有很强的性能、可解释性和临床实用性,支持其在重症监护环境中用于实时风险分层和决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信