Assessing Data Completeness in Emergency Medical Team Reports: Analysis of the Response to Cyclone Idai in Mozambique using the WHO Minimum Data Set.

IF 2 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.22037/aaemj.v13i1.2719
Odgerel Chimed-Ochir, Inn-Kynn Khaing, Ami Fukunaga, Takahito Yoshida, Yuki Takamura, Yui Yumiya, Matchecane Cossa, Isse Ussene, Salio Flavio, Ryoma Kayano, Tatsuhiko Kubo
{"title":"Assessing Data Completeness in Emergency Medical Team Reports: Analysis of the Response to Cyclone Idai in Mozambique using the WHO Minimum Data Set.","authors":"Odgerel Chimed-Ochir, Inn-Kynn Khaing, Ami Fukunaga, Takahito Yoshida, Yuki Takamura, Yui Yumiya, Matchecane Cossa, Isse Ussene, Salio Flavio, Ryoma Kayano, Tatsuhiko Kubo","doi":"10.22037/aaemj.v13i1.2719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 2017, WHO endorsed the Emergency Medical Team (EMT) Minimum Data Set (MDS) for real-time data collection during health emergencies. It was first activated during Cyclone Idai in Mozambique in 2019. The objective of the study is to evaluate the completeness of data collected by EMTs during the Cyclone Idai response in Mozambique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study evaluated data completeness from Cyclone Idai, analyzing 277 daily reports with 18,468 patient consultations from 13 international teams between 27 March and 12 July, 2019. Completeness of team information, demographics, health events, disaster relation, and outcomes were compared across EMT types and classifications using box plots, Kruskal-Wallis, t-tests, and multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the 110-day response, 13 EMTs submitted 277 daily reports on patient information. Findings showed that, out of the 277 daily reports, demographic information was complete in 92.8% of reports, health event information in 62.1%, information on the relation of health events to disaster in 57.4%, and outcome data in 50.2%. Type 2 EMTs exhibited higher data completeness, likely due to greater resources and personnel, compared to Type 1 Mobile and Type 1 Fixed EMTs. Type 1 Fixed EMTs demonstrated lower completeness for outcomes, health events, and disaster relation, potentially due to heavier workloads. Type 1 Mobile EMTs likely benefited from enhanced training and frequent interactions with data managers, which may have contributed to their higher data completeness compared to Type 1 Fixed EMTs. Classified EMTs performed better overall.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the need for standardized training, and the data collection applications that enable the automatic inclusion of information such as geotags.</p>","PeriodicalId":8146,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"e63"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12341006/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/aaemj.v13i1.2719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In 2017, WHO endorsed the Emergency Medical Team (EMT) Minimum Data Set (MDS) for real-time data collection during health emergencies. It was first activated during Cyclone Idai in Mozambique in 2019. The objective of the study is to evaluate the completeness of data collected by EMTs during the Cyclone Idai response in Mozambique.

Methods: This study evaluated data completeness from Cyclone Idai, analyzing 277 daily reports with 18,468 patient consultations from 13 international teams between 27 March and 12 July, 2019. Completeness of team information, demographics, health events, disaster relation, and outcomes were compared across EMT types and classifications using box plots, Kruskal-Wallis, t-tests, and multivariable logistic regression.

Results: During the 110-day response, 13 EMTs submitted 277 daily reports on patient information. Findings showed that, out of the 277 daily reports, demographic information was complete in 92.8% of reports, health event information in 62.1%, information on the relation of health events to disaster in 57.4%, and outcome data in 50.2%. Type 2 EMTs exhibited higher data completeness, likely due to greater resources and personnel, compared to Type 1 Mobile and Type 1 Fixed EMTs. Type 1 Fixed EMTs demonstrated lower completeness for outcomes, health events, and disaster relation, potentially due to heavier workloads. Type 1 Mobile EMTs likely benefited from enhanced training and frequent interactions with data managers, which may have contributed to their higher data completeness compared to Type 1 Fixed EMTs. Classified EMTs performed better overall.

Conclusion: This study underscores the need for standardized training, and the data collection applications that enable the automatic inclusion of information such as geotags.

评估紧急医疗队报告中的数据完整性:使用世卫组织最小数据集分析莫桑比克对伊代气旋的反应。
2017年,世卫组织批准了紧急医疗队(EMT)最小数据集(MDS),用于在突发卫生事件期间实时收集数据。该系统于2019年莫桑比克气旋伊代期间首次启动。本研究的目的是评估emt在莫桑比克“伊代”气旋应对期间收集的数据的完整性。方法:本研究评估了“伊代”气旋的数据完整性,分析了2019年3月27日至7月12日期间来自13个国际团队的18468例患者咨询的277份每日报告。使用箱形图、Kruskal-Wallis检验、t检验和多变量逻辑回归,比较不同EMT类型和分类的团队信息、人口统计、健康事件、灾难关系和结果的完整性。结果:在110天的响应期间,13名emt每天提交277份患者信息报告。结果表明,在277份每日报告中,人口统计信息完整率为92.8%,健康事件信息完整率为62.1%,健康事件与灾害关系信息完整率为57.4%,结局数据完整率为50.2%。与1型移动和1型固定emt相比,2型emt表现出更高的数据完整性,这可能是由于更多的资源和人员。类型1固定emt在结果、健康事件和灾难关系方面表现出较低的完整性,这可能是由于更繁重的工作负载。与1型固定emt相比,1型移动emt可能受益于加强的培训和与数据管理人员的频繁互动,这可能有助于提高他们的数据完整性。分类急救医生的总体表现更好。结论:这项研究强调了标准化培训的必要性,以及能够自动包含地理标签等信息的数据收集应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信