Efficacy of aripiprazole and valbenazine in the treatment of tourette syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Muneeb Ahmad Muneer, Ume Habiba, Shajjia Shehzad, Washija Batool, Dawood Shah, Zain Shahzad, Muhammad Khizar Kirmani, Zohaib Hassan Siddiqui, Areeb Amjad, Ameer Hamza, Muhammad Faizan Khan, Fahad Siddique Butt, Syed Tehseen Haider
{"title":"Efficacy of aripiprazole and valbenazine in the treatment of tourette syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Muneeb Ahmad Muneer, Ume Habiba, Shajjia Shehzad, Washija Batool, Dawood Shah, Zain Shahzad, Muhammad Khizar Kirmani, Zohaib Hassan Siddiqui, Areeb Amjad, Ameer Hamza, Muhammad Faizan Khan, Fahad Siddique Butt, Syed Tehseen Haider","doi":"10.1007/s13760-025-02864-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tourette Syndrome (TS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by involuntary motor and vocal tics, typically manifesting in childhood. Pharmacological interventions play a crucial role in symptom management, yet the comparative efficacy of the most important agents remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate and compare the efficacy of aripiprazole and valbenazine in the treatment of TS through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted up to March 30, 2025. Eligible RCTs included participants aged 6 to 65 years with a clinical diagnosis of TS, comparing aripiprazole or valbenazine to placebo. The primary outcomes were changes in the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale-Total Tic Score (YGTSS-TTS) and Clinical Global Impression of Tourette Syndrome (CGI-TS). Data were analyzed using random-effects models with assessment of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight RCTs involving 626 participants were included. Aripiprazole significantly reduced tic severity (YGTSS-TTS: mean difference [MD] = - 5.96; 95% CI: -9.59 to - 2.33; p < 0.001) and improved global functioning (CGI-TS: MD = - 0.56; 95% CI: -1.10 to - 0.02; p < 0.001), with low heterogeneity. Valbenazine demonstrated a significant trend toward tic reduction (YGTSS-TTS: MD = - 1.93; 95% CI: -2.94 to -0.93; p < 0.001) and significantly improved CGI-TS scores (MD = - 0.36; 95% CI: -0.69 to - 0.02; p < 0.001), though the effects were less pronounced than with aripiprazole.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis indicates that aripiprazole is more effective than valbenazine in reducing tic severity and improving overall clinical outcomes in individuals with TS. While both agents demonstrated statistically significant benefits over placebo, aripiprazole yielded a greater magnitude of improvement with consistent results across studies. These findings support the continued use of aripiprazole as a first-line pharmacologic option, while highlighting valbenazine as a potential alternative in select cases. Further high-quality trials are warranted to clarify the role of valbenazine and optimize individualized treatment strategies for TS.</p>","PeriodicalId":7042,"journal":{"name":"Acta neurologica Belgica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta neurologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-025-02864-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tourette Syndrome (TS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by involuntary motor and vocal tics, typically manifesting in childhood. Pharmacological interventions play a crucial role in symptom management, yet the comparative efficacy of the most important agents remain underexplored.

Objective: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of aripiprazole and valbenazine in the treatment of TS through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted up to March 30, 2025. Eligible RCTs included participants aged 6 to 65 years with a clinical diagnosis of TS, comparing aripiprazole or valbenazine to placebo. The primary outcomes were changes in the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale-Total Tic Score (YGTSS-TTS) and Clinical Global Impression of Tourette Syndrome (CGI-TS). Data were analyzed using random-effects models with assessment of heterogeneity.

Results: Eight RCTs involving 626 participants were included. Aripiprazole significantly reduced tic severity (YGTSS-TTS: mean difference [MD] = - 5.96; 95% CI: -9.59 to - 2.33; p < 0.001) and improved global functioning (CGI-TS: MD = - 0.56; 95% CI: -1.10 to - 0.02; p < 0.001), with low heterogeneity. Valbenazine demonstrated a significant trend toward tic reduction (YGTSS-TTS: MD = - 1.93; 95% CI: -2.94 to -0.93; p < 0.001) and significantly improved CGI-TS scores (MD = - 0.36; 95% CI: -0.69 to - 0.02; p < 0.001), though the effects were less pronounced than with aripiprazole.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis indicates that aripiprazole is more effective than valbenazine in reducing tic severity and improving overall clinical outcomes in individuals with TS. While both agents demonstrated statistically significant benefits over placebo, aripiprazole yielded a greater magnitude of improvement with consistent results across studies. These findings support the continued use of aripiprazole as a first-line pharmacologic option, while highlighting valbenazine as a potential alternative in select cases. Further high-quality trials are warranted to clarify the role of valbenazine and optimize individualized treatment strategies for TS.

阿立哌唑和丙苯嗪治疗抽动秽语综合征的疗效:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:抽动秽语综合征(TS)是一种以不自主运动和声音抽搐为特征的神经发育障碍,典型表现在儿童时期。药理学干预在症状管理中起着至关重要的作用,但最重要的药物的相对疗效仍未得到充分探讨。目的:通过随机对照试验(rct)的系统评价和荟萃分析,评价和比较阿立哌唑与丙苯那嗪治疗TS的疗效。方法:系统检索PubMed, Embase, Scopus和ClinicalTrials.gov,截止到2025年3月30日。符合条件的随机对照试验包括6至65岁临床诊断为TS的参与者,将阿立哌唑或缬苯那嗪与安慰剂进行比较。主要结局是耶鲁整体抽动严重程度量表-总抽动评分(YGTSS-TTS)和抽动秽语综合征临床整体印象(CGI-TS)的变化。采用随机效应模型对数据进行分析,并评估异质性。结果:共纳入8项随机对照试验,共626名受试者。阿立哌唑显著降低抽动严重程度(YGTSS-TTS: mean difference [MD] = - 5.96;95% CI: -9.59 ~ - 2.33;结论:本荟萃分析表明,阿立哌唑在降低抽动严重程度和改善TS患者整体临床结果方面比丙苯嗪更有效。虽然两种药物都比安慰剂有统计学意义上的显著益处,但阿立哌唑的改善程度更大,各研究结果一致。这些发现支持继续使用阿立哌唑作为一线药物选择,同时强调缬苯那嗪在某些病例中是一种潜在的替代方案。需要进一步的高质量试验来阐明缬苯那嗪的作用并优化TS的个体化治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta neurologica Belgica
Acta neurologica Belgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Peer-reviewed and published quarterly, Acta Neurologica Belgicapresents original articles in the clinical and basic neurosciences, and also reports the proceedings and the abstracts of the scientific meetings of the different partner societies. The contents include commentaries, editorials, review articles, case reports, neuro-images of interest, book reviews and letters to the editor. Acta Neurologica Belgica is the official journal of the following national societies: Belgian Neurological Society Belgian Society for Neuroscience Belgian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology Belgian Pediatric Neurology Society Belgian Study Group of Multiple Sclerosis Belgian Stroke Council Belgian Headache Society Belgian Study Group of Neuropathology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信