Impact of maternal body mass index above 30 kg/m2 on adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with and without gestational diabetes mellitus in southeastern Sweden.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Anna Stogianni, Annika Jönsson, Malin Penna, Lena Lendahls, Michael Alvarsson, Mona Landin-Olsson, Pär Wanby, Maria Thunander
{"title":"Impact of maternal body mass index above 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> on adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with and without gestational diabetes mellitus in southeastern Sweden.","authors":"Anna Stogianni, Annika Jönsson, Malin Penna, Lena Lendahls, Michael Alvarsson, Mona Landin-Olsson, Pär Wanby, Maria Thunander","doi":"10.1111/aogs.70040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Our objective was to evaluate the association of early-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) with maternal, delivery, and child outcomes, and compare with pregnancies without diabetes in southeastern Sweden, including after a surge of non-European immigration.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective population-based observational study of all 401 singleton pregnancies with GDM in the Kronoberg and southern Kalmar regions, 2013-2018, and 377 pregnancies without diabetes, matched by date of delivery. Data were collected by chart review. Women with early-pregnancy BMI <30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>/≥30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> were compared. Main outcomes were gestational weight gain (GWG), continuous and dichotomized <8 kg/≥8 kg, preeclampsia, cesarean section (CS), and large-for-gestational-age (LGA). Maternal age, ethnicity, parity, smoking, physical activity, delivery type and week, birthweight, and the APGAR<sub>5min</sub> score were also registered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Obese women with GDM had lower mean GWG (9.2 ± 6.8 vs. 11.7 ± 6.1 kg); fewer reached ≥8 kg (54% vs. 75%), more had preeclampsia (13% vs. 2.6%), and infants weighed 200 g less than those of nonobese women with GDM all p < 0.001 and those of obese women without GDM (11.2 ± 5.8 kg, p < 0.001; 68%, p = 0.05, 3.1%, p = 0.03). APGAR<sub>5min</sub> scores were high in all groups, 9.4-9.8. All women with GDM had a higher prevalence of LGA infants than controls without diabetes; obese 24% versus 12% (p = 0.03) and nonobese 11% versus 6% (p = 0.05). Obese women with GDM delivered more LGA infants than nonobese women with GDM, p = 0.001. The combination of GDM and obesity increased risk of LGA, OR 5.3 (2.76-10.1); preeclampsia OR 4.3 (1.83-10.23); and CS OR 1.9 (1.26-2.97) and decreased odds of GWG ≥8 kg, OR 0.25 (0.16-0.38), compared to the reference group of nonobese women without GDM. All results remained unchanged in a sensitivity analysis using the BMI obesity limit ≥27.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup> for Asians, who were overrepresented in the group of women with GDM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women with GDM and obesity, especially in combination, had a greater risk for preeclampsia, CS, and delivering LGA infants; their lower GWG and high APGAR<sub>5min</sub> scores in all groups, compared to earlier studies, suggested successful care interventions. Efforts to lower the levels of early-pregnancy obesity and strict glucose control in women with GDM are recommended to reduce adverse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.70040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Our objective was to evaluate the association of early-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) with maternal, delivery, and child outcomes, and compare with pregnancies without diabetes in southeastern Sweden, including after a surge of non-European immigration.

Material and methods: A retrospective population-based observational study of all 401 singleton pregnancies with GDM in the Kronoberg and southern Kalmar regions, 2013-2018, and 377 pregnancies without diabetes, matched by date of delivery. Data were collected by chart review. Women with early-pregnancy BMI <30 kg/m2/≥30 kg/m2 were compared. Main outcomes were gestational weight gain (GWG), continuous and dichotomized <8 kg/≥8 kg, preeclampsia, cesarean section (CS), and large-for-gestational-age (LGA). Maternal age, ethnicity, parity, smoking, physical activity, delivery type and week, birthweight, and the APGAR5min score were also registered.

Results: Obese women with GDM had lower mean GWG (9.2 ± 6.8 vs. 11.7 ± 6.1 kg); fewer reached ≥8 kg (54% vs. 75%), more had preeclampsia (13% vs. 2.6%), and infants weighed 200 g less than those of nonobese women with GDM all p < 0.001 and those of obese women without GDM (11.2 ± 5.8 kg, p < 0.001; 68%, p = 0.05, 3.1%, p = 0.03). APGAR5min scores were high in all groups, 9.4-9.8. All women with GDM had a higher prevalence of LGA infants than controls without diabetes; obese 24% versus 12% (p = 0.03) and nonobese 11% versus 6% (p = 0.05). Obese women with GDM delivered more LGA infants than nonobese women with GDM, p = 0.001. The combination of GDM and obesity increased risk of LGA, OR 5.3 (2.76-10.1); preeclampsia OR 4.3 (1.83-10.23); and CS OR 1.9 (1.26-2.97) and decreased odds of GWG ≥8 kg, OR 0.25 (0.16-0.38), compared to the reference group of nonobese women without GDM. All results remained unchanged in a sensitivity analysis using the BMI obesity limit ≥27.5 kg/m2 for Asians, who were overrepresented in the group of women with GDM.

Conclusions: Women with GDM and obesity, especially in combination, had a greater risk for preeclampsia, CS, and delivering LGA infants; their lower GWG and high APGAR5min scores in all groups, compared to earlier studies, suggested successful care interventions. Efforts to lower the levels of early-pregnancy obesity and strict glucose control in women with GDM are recommended to reduce adverse outcomes.

瑞典东南部孕妇体重指数大于30 kg/m2对有和无妊娠期糖尿病妇女不良妊娠结局的影响
前言:我们的目的是评估妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)妇女妊娠早期体重指数(BMI)与孕产妇、分娩和儿童结局的关系,并与瑞典东南部非糖尿病孕妇进行比较,包括在非欧洲移民激增之后。材料和方法:一项基于人群的回顾性观察研究,包括2013-2018年Kronoberg和Kalmar南部地区所有401例患有GDM的单胎妊娠,以及377例未患糖尿病的妊娠,按分娩日期匹配。通过图表回顾收集数据。比较孕早期BMI 2/≥30 kg/m2的妇女。主要结果为妊娠体重增加(GWG),并记录连续和二分5min评分。结果:肥胖女性合并GDM的平均GWG较低(9.2±6.8 vs 11.7±6.1 kg);达到≥8 kg的较少(54%对75%),有先兆子痫的较多(13%对2.6%),婴儿体重比非肥胖的GDM妇女轻200 g。所有组的p 5min评分都很高,9.4-9.8。所有患有GDM的妇女比没有糖尿病的对照组有更高的LGA婴儿患病率;肥胖24%对12% (p = 0.03),非肥胖11%对6% (p = 0.05)。患有GDM的肥胖妇女比患有GDM的非肥胖妇女分娩更多的LGA婴儿,p = 0.001。GDM合并肥胖增加LGA风险,OR为5.3 (2.76-10.1);子痫前期OR为4.3 (1.83-10.23);CS OR为1.9 (1.26-2.97),GWG≥8 kg的几率为0.25(0.16-0.38),与无GDM的非肥胖女性对照组相比降低。在使用BMI肥胖限制≥27.5 kg/m2的亚洲人的敏感性分析中,所有结果保持不变,亚洲人在GDM女性组中比例过高。结论:伴有GDM和肥胖的女性,尤其是合并糖尿病和肥胖的女性,发生子痫前期、CS和分娩LGA婴儿的风险更高;与早期研究相比,所有组中较低的GWG和较高的APGAR5min评分表明护理干预措施成功。建议降低妊娠早期肥胖水平,并严格控制GDM妇女的血糖,以减少不良后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
180
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信