Acupuncture for induction of labor in uncomplicated term pregnancies and the role of the acupoint selection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
An Chen, Jiawen Zhang, Du Gao, Ying Xu, Shijia Jin, Tianyi Zhou, Fan Qu, Ganesh Acharya
{"title":"Acupuncture for induction of labor in uncomplicated term pregnancies and the role of the acupoint selection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"An Chen, Jiawen Zhang, Du Gao, Ying Xu, Shijia Jin, Tianyi Zhou, Fan Qu, Ganesh Acharya","doi":"10.1111/aogs.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acupuncture is increasingly used for inducing labor; however, its effects on labor progression and birth outcomes remain inconclusive, and differences in acupuncture techniques are not fully considered by previous reviews. This study aims to evaluate the effects of acupuncture for induction of labor (AC-IOL) after 37 weeks of gestation on labor progression and birth outcomes, with a particular focus on comparing the combined stimulation of local and distant (L-D) acupoints with the selective use of either local or distant acupoints.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and three Chinese databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating AC-IOL in uncomplicated pregnancies. Outcomes included onset of spontaneous labor, labor duration, use of epidural analgesia, mode of delivery, and Apgar score at 5 min. Meta-analyses were performed for each outcome, with subgroup analyses based on acupoint selection strategies. Quality assessment for the included studies was conducted using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and certainty of evidence using GRADEpro GDT. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024497859).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies including 1,432 participants were included. Five studies used combined L-D acupoint stimulation, and five used distant acupoints only; none used local acupoints alone. No significant differences were found between the acupuncture and control groups (sham acupuncture or usual care) in the onset of spontaneous labor, use of epidural analgesia, mode of delivery, or neonatal Apgar score ≤7 at 5 min. No significant differences in these outcomes were found in comparisons between the acupuncture group using a combination of L-D acupoints and the control group, nor between the acupuncture group using distant-only acupoints and the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Moderate to very low-quality evidence suggests that AC-IOL was not associated with labor progression or birth outcomes in uncomplicated full-term pregnancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.70036","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Acupuncture is increasingly used for inducing labor; however, its effects on labor progression and birth outcomes remain inconclusive, and differences in acupuncture techniques are not fully considered by previous reviews. This study aims to evaluate the effects of acupuncture for induction of labor (AC-IOL) after 37 weeks of gestation on labor progression and birth outcomes, with a particular focus on comparing the combined stimulation of local and distant (L-D) acupoints with the selective use of either local or distant acupoints.

Material and methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and three Chinese databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating AC-IOL in uncomplicated pregnancies. Outcomes included onset of spontaneous labor, labor duration, use of epidural analgesia, mode of delivery, and Apgar score at 5 min. Meta-analyses were performed for each outcome, with subgroup analyses based on acupoint selection strategies. Quality assessment for the included studies was conducted using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and certainty of evidence using GRADEpro GDT. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024497859).

Results: Ten studies including 1,432 participants were included. Five studies used combined L-D acupoint stimulation, and five used distant acupoints only; none used local acupoints alone. No significant differences were found between the acupuncture and control groups (sham acupuncture or usual care) in the onset of spontaneous labor, use of epidural analgesia, mode of delivery, or neonatal Apgar score ≤7 at 5 min. No significant differences in these outcomes were found in comparisons between the acupuncture group using a combination of L-D acupoints and the control group, nor between the acupuncture group using distant-only acupoints and the control group.

Conclusions: Moderate to very low-quality evidence suggests that AC-IOL was not associated with labor progression or birth outcomes in uncomplicated full-term pregnancies.

针刺对无并发症足月妊娠引产及穴位选择的作用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
导读:针灸越来越多地用于引产;然而,它对产程和分娩结局的影响仍然不确定,针灸技术的差异也没有被以前的综述充分考虑。本研究旨在评估37周后针灸引产(AC-IOL)对分娩进程和分娩结局的影响,特别关注局部和远处(L-D)穴位联合刺激与局部或远处穴位选择性使用的比较。材料和方法:根据PRISMA 2020指南,我们检索了PubMed, Embase, Web of Science和三个中文数据库,以评估AC-IOL在无并发症妊娠中的随机对照试验(rct)。结果包括自然分娩的发生、分娩持续时间、硬膜外镇痛的使用、分娩方式和5分钟时的Apgar评分。对每个结果进行荟萃分析,并根据穴位选择策略进行亚组分析。使用Cochrane RoB 2工具对纳入的研究进行质量评估,并使用GRADEpro GDT对证据的确定性进行评估。该协议已在PROSPERO (CRD42024497859)中注册。结果:纳入10项研究,共1432名受试者。5项研究采用左至右联合穴位刺激,5项研究仅使用远端穴位;没有人单独使用局部穴位。针刺组与对照组(假针组或常规护理组)在自然分娩的发生、硬膜外镇痛的使用、分娩方式或新生儿Apgar评分≤7分(5 min)方面均无显著差异。在使用L-D联合穴位的针灸组和对照组之间,以及使用远距穴位的针灸组和对照组之间,这些结果没有显著差异。结论:中度至极低质量的证据表明,在无并发症的足月妊娠中,AC-IOL与产程或分娩结局无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
180
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信