The Efficacy of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Combined with Topical Oxygen Therapy in Treating Chronic Refractory Wounds: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Junwei Su, Dong Zhang, Jincheng Du, Ruozu Xiao, Zhe Liu, Yuqian Li, Haowei Zhou, Jing Li
{"title":"The Efficacy of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Combined with Topical Oxygen Therapy in Treating Chronic Refractory Wounds: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Junwei Su, Dong Zhang, Jincheng Du, Ruozu Xiao, Zhe Liu, Yuqian Li, Haowei Zhou, Jing Li","doi":"10.1177/21621918251366606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the clinical efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) combined with topical oxygen therapy (TOT) for chronic refractory wounds (CRWs), addressing potential hypoxia limitation of NPWT through oxygen supplementation, thereby offering an innovative therapeutic approach for CRWs. <b>Approach:</b> The study was performed according to the 2015 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols statement. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of CRWs with NPWT combined with TOT (inception to October 2024). Studies were screened based on predefined criteria, and data were extracted and assessed using RevMan 5.4. Meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias assessment were performed using Stata 15.0. <b>Results:</b> Eleven RCTs (844 patients) were included. Compared with NPWT, the combination therapy was associated with the following outcomes: increased healing rate (risk ratio [RR] = 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36-1.69, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 18.1%), reduced time from debridement to skin grafting (mean difference [MD] = -2.82 days, 95% CI: -3.15 to -2.50, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 4%), shortened healing time (MD = -9.09 days, 95% CI: -11.98 to -6.20, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 91.2%), enhanced granulation coverage (MD = 7.56%, 95% CI: 6.09-9.03, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.0%), and decreased bacterial positivity (RR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.18-0.41, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.0%). <b>Innovation:</b> This study provides evidence-based medical research supporting NPWT plus TOT as a synergistic strategy for CRWs. <b>Conclusion:</b> Combined therapy may offer benefits over NPWT alone in CRW treatment, suggesting a promising approach to improve healing outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7413,"journal":{"name":"Advances in wound care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21621918251366606","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) combined with topical oxygen therapy (TOT) for chronic refractory wounds (CRWs), addressing potential hypoxia limitation of NPWT through oxygen supplementation, thereby offering an innovative therapeutic approach for CRWs. Approach: The study was performed according to the 2015 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols statement. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of CRWs with NPWT combined with TOT (inception to October 2024). Studies were screened based on predefined criteria, and data were extracted and assessed using RevMan 5.4. Meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias assessment were performed using Stata 15.0. Results: Eleven RCTs (844 patients) were included. Compared with NPWT, the combination therapy was associated with the following outcomes: increased healing rate (risk ratio [RR] = 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36-1.69, I2 = 18.1%), reduced time from debridement to skin grafting (mean difference [MD] = -2.82 days, 95% CI: -3.15 to -2.50, I2 = 4%), shortened healing time (MD = -9.09 days, 95% CI: -11.98 to -6.20, I2 = 91.2%), enhanced granulation coverage (MD = 7.56%, 95% CI: 6.09-9.03, I2 = 0.0%), and decreased bacterial positivity (RR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.18-0.41, I2 = 0.0%). Innovation: This study provides evidence-based medical research supporting NPWT plus TOT as a synergistic strategy for CRWs. Conclusion: Combined therapy may offer benefits over NPWT alone in CRW treatment, suggesting a promising approach to improve healing outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Wound Care rapidly shares research from bench to bedside, with wound care applications for burns, major trauma, blast injuries, surgery, and diabetic ulcers. The Journal provides a critical, peer-reviewed forum for the field of tissue injury and repair, with an emphasis on acute and chronic wounds.
Advances in Wound Care explores novel research approaches and practices to deliver the latest scientific discoveries and developments.
Advances in Wound Care coverage includes:
Skin bioengineering,
Skin and tissue regeneration,
Acute, chronic, and complex wounds,
Dressings,
Anti-scar strategies,
Inflammation,
Burns and healing,
Biofilm,
Oxygen and angiogenesis,
Critical limb ischemia,
Military wound care,
New devices and technologies.