The Efficacy of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Combined with Topical Oxygen Therapy in Treating Chronic Refractory Wounds: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 5.6 3区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Junwei Su, Dong Zhang, Jincheng Du, Ruozu Xiao, Zhe Liu, Yuqian Li, Haowei Zhou, Jing Li
{"title":"The Efficacy of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Combined with Topical Oxygen Therapy in Treating Chronic Refractory Wounds: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Junwei Su, Dong Zhang, Jincheng Du, Ruozu Xiao, Zhe Liu, Yuqian Li, Haowei Zhou, Jing Li","doi":"10.1177/21621918251366606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the clinical efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) combined with topical oxygen therapy (TOT) for chronic refractory wounds (CRWs), addressing potential hypoxia limitation of NPWT through oxygen supplementation, thereby offering an innovative therapeutic approach for CRWs. <b>Approach:</b> The study was performed according to the 2015 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols statement. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of CRWs with NPWT combined with TOT (inception to October 2024). Studies were screened based on predefined criteria, and data were extracted and assessed using RevMan 5.4. Meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias assessment were performed using Stata 15.0. <b>Results:</b> Eleven RCTs (844 patients) were included. Compared with NPWT, the combination therapy was associated with the following outcomes: increased healing rate (risk ratio [RR] = 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36-1.69, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 18.1%), reduced time from debridement to skin grafting (mean difference [MD] = -2.82 days, 95% CI: -3.15 to -2.50, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 4%), shortened healing time (MD = -9.09 days, 95% CI: -11.98 to -6.20, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 91.2%), enhanced granulation coverage (MD = 7.56%, 95% CI: 6.09-9.03, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.0%), and decreased bacterial positivity (RR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.18-0.41, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.0%). <b>Innovation:</b> This study provides evidence-based medical research supporting NPWT plus TOT as a synergistic strategy for CRWs. <b>Conclusion:</b> Combined therapy may offer benefits over NPWT alone in CRW treatment, suggesting a promising approach to improve healing outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7413,"journal":{"name":"Advances in wound care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21621918251366606","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) combined with topical oxygen therapy (TOT) for chronic refractory wounds (CRWs), addressing potential hypoxia limitation of NPWT through oxygen supplementation, thereby offering an innovative therapeutic approach for CRWs. Approach: The study was performed according to the 2015 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols statement. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of CRWs with NPWT combined with TOT (inception to October 2024). Studies were screened based on predefined criteria, and data were extracted and assessed using RevMan 5.4. Meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias assessment were performed using Stata 15.0. Results: Eleven RCTs (844 patients) were included. Compared with NPWT, the combination therapy was associated with the following outcomes: increased healing rate (risk ratio [RR] = 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36-1.69, I2 = 18.1%), reduced time from debridement to skin grafting (mean difference [MD] = -2.82 days, 95% CI: -3.15 to -2.50, I2 = 4%), shortened healing time (MD = -9.09 days, 95% CI: -11.98 to -6.20, I2 = 91.2%), enhanced granulation coverage (MD = 7.56%, 95% CI: 6.09-9.03, I2 = 0.0%), and decreased bacterial positivity (RR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.18-0.41, I2 = 0.0%). Innovation: This study provides evidence-based medical research supporting NPWT plus TOT as a synergistic strategy for CRWs. Conclusion: Combined therapy may offer benefits over NPWT alone in CRW treatment, suggesting a promising approach to improve healing outcomes.

负压创面联合局部氧疗治疗慢性难治性创面的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:评价负压创面治疗(NPWT)联合局部氧疗(TOT)治疗慢性难治性创面(CRWs)的临床疗效,通过补氧解决NPWT潜在的缺氧限制,为慢性难治性创面提供一种创新的治疗途径。方法:本研究按照2015年系统评价和荟萃分析方案首选报告项目声明进行。综合检索PubMed、Cochrane、Embase、Web of Science、CNKI、VIP、万方等数据库,检索NPWT联合TOT治疗CRWs的随机对照试验(rct)(启动至2024年10月)。根据预先设定的标准筛选研究,使用RevMan 5.4提取和评估数据。meta分析、敏感性分析和发表偏倚评价采用Stata 15.0进行。结果:纳入11项rct(844例患者)。与NPWT相比,联合治疗与以下结果相关:愈合率提高(风险比[RR] = 1.51, 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.36-1.69, I2 = 18.1%),从清创到植皮时间缩短(平均差[MD] = -2.82天,95% CI: -3.15至-2.50,I2 = 4%),愈合时间缩短(MD = -9.09天,95% CI: -11.98至-6.20,I2 = 91.2%),肉芽覆盖率提高(MD = 7.56%, 95% CI:6.09-9.03, I2 = 0.0%),细菌阳性率降低(RR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.18-0.41, I2 = 0.0%)。创新:本研究提供了循证医学研究,支持NPWT + TOT作为crw的协同策略。结论:在CRW治疗中,联合治疗可能比单独使用NPWT更有益处,这表明一种有希望改善愈合结果的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in wound care
Advances in wound care Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
4.10%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Advances in Wound Care rapidly shares research from bench to bedside, with wound care applications for burns, major trauma, blast injuries, surgery, and diabetic ulcers. The Journal provides a critical, peer-reviewed forum for the field of tissue injury and repair, with an emphasis on acute and chronic wounds. Advances in Wound Care explores novel research approaches and practices to deliver the latest scientific discoveries and developments. Advances in Wound Care coverage includes: Skin bioengineering, Skin and tissue regeneration, Acute, chronic, and complex wounds, Dressings, Anti-scar strategies, Inflammation, Burns and healing, Biofilm, Oxygen and angiogenesis, Critical limb ischemia, Military wound care, New devices and technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信