Systematic Comparison of Bone Proteome Extraction Methods to Allow for Integrated Proteomics–Metabolomics Correlation

IF 3.6 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Vivien Wiltzsch, Johannes R. Schmidt, Klaudia Adamowicz, Theresa Lauterbach, Jörg Lehmann, Jan Baumbach, Tanja Laske and Stefan Kalkhof*, 
{"title":"Systematic Comparison of Bone Proteome Extraction Methods to Allow for Integrated Proteomics–Metabolomics Correlation","authors":"Vivien Wiltzsch,&nbsp;Johannes R. Schmidt,&nbsp;Klaudia Adamowicz,&nbsp;Theresa Lauterbach,&nbsp;Jörg Lehmann,&nbsp;Jan Baumbach,&nbsp;Tanja Laske and Stefan Kalkhof*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c01060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Bone tissue poses significant challenges for proteomic analysis due to its dense, mineral-rich matrix and predominance of collagen, overshadowing low-abundance proteins critical for understanding bone physiology during LC–MS/MS-based proteomic analysis. In this study, we present a rapid sequential two-step extraction protocol designed to enhance proteome coverage, reduce collagen interference without using collagenase, and ensure robust quantification while enabling simultaneous metabolome analysis. We systematically compared it with two previously reported methods, which attempt to reduce collagen content through enzymatic collagen digestion or by employing four sequential extractions. Performance was evaluated based on reproducible protein quantification, variance, collagen content, processing, and instrument time. Our protocol reproducibly quantified 4,518 proteins across a dynamic range of 4 orders of magnitude. It demonstrated only marginally inferior quantification performance compared to the four-step protocol while reducing extraction and measurement time by half. Further, it significantly outperformed the collagenase-based method, which quantified only 2,689 proteins. Incorporating a chloroform–methanol metabolite extraction only led to a minimal reduction in quantifiable proteins, making the protocol suitable for multiomics applications. In conclusion, this protocol facilitates comprehensive coverage of proteins after metabolite extraction, enabling comprehensive multiomics analyses and aiding in the assessment of bone diseases and therapeutic developments.</p>","PeriodicalId":48,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Proteome Research","volume":"24 9","pages":"4362–4376"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c01060","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Proteome Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c01060","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bone tissue poses significant challenges for proteomic analysis due to its dense, mineral-rich matrix and predominance of collagen, overshadowing low-abundance proteins critical for understanding bone physiology during LC–MS/MS-based proteomic analysis. In this study, we present a rapid sequential two-step extraction protocol designed to enhance proteome coverage, reduce collagen interference without using collagenase, and ensure robust quantification while enabling simultaneous metabolome analysis. We systematically compared it with two previously reported methods, which attempt to reduce collagen content through enzymatic collagen digestion or by employing four sequential extractions. Performance was evaluated based on reproducible protein quantification, variance, collagen content, processing, and instrument time. Our protocol reproducibly quantified 4,518 proteins across a dynamic range of 4 orders of magnitude. It demonstrated only marginally inferior quantification performance compared to the four-step protocol while reducing extraction and measurement time by half. Further, it significantly outperformed the collagenase-based method, which quantified only 2,689 proteins. Incorporating a chloroform–methanol metabolite extraction only led to a minimal reduction in quantifiable proteins, making the protocol suitable for multiomics applications. In conclusion, this protocol facilitates comprehensive coverage of proteins after metabolite extraction, enabling comprehensive multiomics analyses and aiding in the assessment of bone diseases and therapeutic developments.

骨蛋白质组提取方法的系统比较,以实现蛋白质组学与代谢组学的综合关联。
骨组织由于其致密、富含矿物质的基质和胶原蛋白的优势,对蛋白质组学分析构成了重大挑战,掩盖了在LC-MS/MS-based蛋白质组学分析中对理解骨骼生理至关重要的低丰度蛋白质。在这项研究中,我们提出了一种快速连续两步提取方案,旨在增强蛋白质组覆盖,减少胶原蛋白干扰,而不使用胶原酶,并确保可靠的定量,同时实现代谢组分析。我们系统地将其与先前报道的两种方法进行了比较,这两种方法试图通过酶促胶原蛋白消化或采用四种顺序提取来减少胶原蛋白含量。根据可重复蛋白定量、方差、胶原含量、加工和仪器时间来评估性能。我们的方案在4个数量级的动态范围内可重复量化4,518种蛋白质。与四步方案相比,它的量化性能仅略差,同时将提取和测量时间减少了一半。此外,它明显优于基于胶原酶的方法,后者仅定量2,689种蛋白质。结合氯仿-甲醇代谢物萃取只导致可量化蛋白质的最小减少,使该方案适用于多组学应用。总之,该方案促进了代谢产物提取后蛋白质的全面覆盖,实现了全面的多组学分析,并有助于评估骨病和治疗发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Proteome Research
Journal of Proteome Research 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
251
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Proteome Research publishes content encompassing all aspects of global protein analysis and function, including the dynamic aspects of genomics, spatio-temporal proteomics, metabonomics and metabolomics, clinical and agricultural proteomics, as well as advances in methodology including bioinformatics. The theme and emphasis is on a multidisciplinary approach to the life sciences through the synergy between the different types of "omics".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信