Vivien Wiltzsch, Johannes R. Schmidt, Klaudia Adamowicz, Theresa Lauterbach, Jörg Lehmann, Jan Baumbach, Tanja Laske and Stefan Kalkhof*,
{"title":"Systematic Comparison of Bone Proteome Extraction Methods to Allow for Integrated Proteomics–Metabolomics Correlation","authors":"Vivien Wiltzsch, Johannes R. Schmidt, Klaudia Adamowicz, Theresa Lauterbach, Jörg Lehmann, Jan Baumbach, Tanja Laske and Stefan Kalkhof*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c01060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Bone tissue poses significant challenges for proteomic analysis due to its dense, mineral-rich matrix and predominance of collagen, overshadowing low-abundance proteins critical for understanding bone physiology during LC–MS/MS-based proteomic analysis. In this study, we present a rapid sequential two-step extraction protocol designed to enhance proteome coverage, reduce collagen interference without using collagenase, and ensure robust quantification while enabling simultaneous metabolome analysis. We systematically compared it with two previously reported methods, which attempt to reduce collagen content through enzymatic collagen digestion or by employing four sequential extractions. Performance was evaluated based on reproducible protein quantification, variance, collagen content, processing, and instrument time. Our protocol reproducibly quantified 4,518 proteins across a dynamic range of 4 orders of magnitude. It demonstrated only marginally inferior quantification performance compared to the four-step protocol while reducing extraction and measurement time by half. Further, it significantly outperformed the collagenase-based method, which quantified only 2,689 proteins. Incorporating a chloroform–methanol metabolite extraction only led to a minimal reduction in quantifiable proteins, making the protocol suitable for multiomics applications. In conclusion, this protocol facilitates comprehensive coverage of proteins after metabolite extraction, enabling comprehensive multiomics analyses and aiding in the assessment of bone diseases and therapeutic developments.</p>","PeriodicalId":48,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Proteome Research","volume":"24 9","pages":"4362–4376"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c01060","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Proteome Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c01060","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Bone tissue poses significant challenges for proteomic analysis due to its dense, mineral-rich matrix and predominance of collagen, overshadowing low-abundance proteins critical for understanding bone physiology during LC–MS/MS-based proteomic analysis. In this study, we present a rapid sequential two-step extraction protocol designed to enhance proteome coverage, reduce collagen interference without using collagenase, and ensure robust quantification while enabling simultaneous metabolome analysis. We systematically compared it with two previously reported methods, which attempt to reduce collagen content through enzymatic collagen digestion or by employing four sequential extractions. Performance was evaluated based on reproducible protein quantification, variance, collagen content, processing, and instrument time. Our protocol reproducibly quantified 4,518 proteins across a dynamic range of 4 orders of magnitude. It demonstrated only marginally inferior quantification performance compared to the four-step protocol while reducing extraction and measurement time by half. Further, it significantly outperformed the collagenase-based method, which quantified only 2,689 proteins. Incorporating a chloroform–methanol metabolite extraction only led to a minimal reduction in quantifiable proteins, making the protocol suitable for multiomics applications. In conclusion, this protocol facilitates comprehensive coverage of proteins after metabolite extraction, enabling comprehensive multiomics analyses and aiding in the assessment of bone diseases and therapeutic developments.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Proteome Research publishes content encompassing all aspects of global protein analysis and function, including the dynamic aspects of genomics, spatio-temporal proteomics, metabonomics and metabolomics, clinical and agricultural proteomics, as well as advances in methodology including bioinformatics. The theme and emphasis is on a multidisciplinary approach to the life sciences through the synergy between the different types of "omics".