Geological Screening for CO2 Storage in Deep Saline Aquifers in the Lower Mainland British Columbia (LMBC), Canada

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Maziyar Nazemi, Shahin E. Dashtgard, Francyne Bochi do Amarante, Hassan Hassanzadeh, Andrew D. La Croix
{"title":"Geological Screening for CO2 Storage in Deep Saline Aquifers in the Lower Mainland British Columbia (LMBC), Canada","authors":"Maziyar Nazemi,&nbsp;Shahin E. Dashtgard,&nbsp;Francyne Bochi do Amarante,&nbsp;Hassan Hassanzadeh,&nbsp;Andrew D. La Croix","doi":"10.1002/ghg.2345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Deep saline aquifers and depleted reservoirs are prime candidates for CO<sub>2</sub> storage, but feasibility assessments remain limited in regions with little oil and gas activity, such as the Lower Mainland of British Columbia (LMBC), Canada. This study evaluates the CO<sub>2</sub> storage potential of the Georgia Basin strata beneath the LMBC, focusing on three intervals (Nanaimo Group, Huntingdon Formation, and Boundary Bay Formation) in Western, Central, and Eastern LMBC. Eastern LMBC holds limited potential for CO<sub>2</sub> storage due to both the shallow depth of strata in that region and the high geological uncertainty resulting from limited subsurface data. The Upper Cretaceous Nanaimo Group across the entire LMBC is unsuitable for CO<sub>2</sub> injection because it has very poor reservoir quality (generally &lt;1 mD permeability and &lt;8% porosity). In contrast, the Paleogene Huntingdon Formation in Western and Central LMBC contains thick successions of reservoir-quality rock (average thickness: 110 m, porosity: 15%), though its low permeability (≥10 mD) may restrict injection rates. Its estimated CO<sub>2</sub> storage capacity is ∼400 Mt, making it a secondary target. The Neogene Boundary Bay Formation, also in Western and Central LMBC, offers the most favorable conditions, with higher permeability (13–67 mD), porosity (18%–21%), and thick reservoir intervals (up to 155 m). It has an estimated CO<sub>2</sub> storage capacity of ∼430 Mt. With low fault density and minimal wellbore leakage risks, the Boundary Bay Formation and then the Huntingdon Formation below Western and Central LMBC are recommended as the primary targets for CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration in the region.</p>","PeriodicalId":12796,"journal":{"name":"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology","volume":"15 4","pages":"432-448"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ghg.2345","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ghg.2345","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deep saline aquifers and depleted reservoirs are prime candidates for CO2 storage, but feasibility assessments remain limited in regions with little oil and gas activity, such as the Lower Mainland of British Columbia (LMBC), Canada. This study evaluates the CO2 storage potential of the Georgia Basin strata beneath the LMBC, focusing on three intervals (Nanaimo Group, Huntingdon Formation, and Boundary Bay Formation) in Western, Central, and Eastern LMBC. Eastern LMBC holds limited potential for CO2 storage due to both the shallow depth of strata in that region and the high geological uncertainty resulting from limited subsurface data. The Upper Cretaceous Nanaimo Group across the entire LMBC is unsuitable for CO2 injection because it has very poor reservoir quality (generally <1 mD permeability and <8% porosity). In contrast, the Paleogene Huntingdon Formation in Western and Central LMBC contains thick successions of reservoir-quality rock (average thickness: 110 m, porosity: 15%), though its low permeability (≥10 mD) may restrict injection rates. Its estimated CO2 storage capacity is ∼400 Mt, making it a secondary target. The Neogene Boundary Bay Formation, also in Western and Central LMBC, offers the most favorable conditions, with higher permeability (13–67 mD), porosity (18%–21%), and thick reservoir intervals (up to 155 m). It has an estimated CO2 storage capacity of ∼430 Mt. With low fault density and minimal wellbore leakage risks, the Boundary Bay Formation and then the Huntingdon Formation below Western and Central LMBC are recommended as the primary targets for CO2 sequestration in the region.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省低陆平原(LMBC)深层盐水含水层二氧化碳储存地质筛选
深层咸水层和枯竭的储层是二氧化碳储存的主要候选者,但在石油和天然气活动较少的地区,如加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省(LMBC)的低陆平原,可行性评估仍然有限。本研究以西部、中部和东部的Nanaimo组、Huntingdon组和Boundary Bay组3个层段为研究对象,评估了乔治亚盆地下部地层的CO2储存潜力。由于该地区地层深度较浅以及有限的地下数据导致的高地质不确定性,东lbc地区的二氧化碳储存潜力有限。整个LMBC的上白垩统Nanaimo组由于储层质量非常差(渗透率一般为1md,孔隙度为8%),不适合进行CO2注入。相比之下,LMBC西部和中部的古近系亨廷顿组含有较厚的储层岩石(平均厚度为110 m,孔隙度为15%),但其低渗透率(≥10 mD)可能限制了注入速度。其估计的二氧化碳储存能力约为400 Mt,使其成为次要目标。新近系边界湾组(也位于LMBC的西部和中部)具有较高的渗透率(13-67 mD)、孔隙度(18%-21%)和较厚的储层间距(可达155 m),提供了最有利的条件。由于断层密度低,井筒泄漏风险最小,因此建议将边界湾组和中西部LMBC下方的Huntingdon组作为该地区二氧化碳封存的主要目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology ENERGY & FUELS-ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
55
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology is a new online-only scientific journal dedicated to the management of greenhouse gases. The journal will focus on methods for carbon capture and storage (CCS), as well as utilization of carbon dioxide (CO2) as a feedstock for fuels and chemicals. GHG will also provide insight into strategies to mitigate emissions of other greenhouse gases. Significant advances will be explored in critical reviews, commentary articles and short communications of broad interest. In addition, the journal will offer analyses of relevant economic and political issues, industry developments and case studies. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology is an exciting new online-only journal published as a co-operative venture of the SCI (Society of Chemical Industry) and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信