Extending monitoring with sediment archive approaches: Comparison of biomonitoring, metabarcoding, and biomarkers to assess past phytoplankton dynamics

IF 1.9 3区 地球科学 Q2 LIMNOLOGY
Juliane Romahn, Alexandra Schmidt, Jérôme Kaiser, Damian Baranski, Helge W. Arz, Laura S. Epp, Anke Kremp, Miklós Bálint
{"title":"Extending monitoring with sediment archive approaches: Comparison of biomonitoring, metabarcoding, and biomarkers to assess past phytoplankton dynamics","authors":"Juliane Romahn,&nbsp;Alexandra Schmidt,&nbsp;Jérôme Kaiser,&nbsp;Damian Baranski,&nbsp;Helge W. Arz,&nbsp;Laura S. Epp,&nbsp;Anke Kremp,&nbsp;Miklós Bálint","doi":"10.1002/lom3.10694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sedimentary archives can provide valuable insights into the study of anthropogenic impacts on marine and limnic ecosystems over centennial and millennial timescales, potentially extending the temporal breadth of observation-based biomonitoring. Sedimentary archives allow for the tracking of biodiversity changes over long time periods, potentially including periods before human-induced changes. However, evaluations of biodiversity reconstructions using sedimentary approaches through comparisons with existing observation-based biomonitoring data are limited. Here we compared sedimentary ancient DNA metabarcoding and several biomarkers with &gt;50 years of phytoplankton biomonitoring data from the Baltic Sea. Our findings indicated that both sedimentary ancient DNA metabarcoding and biomarkers reveal historical trends in phytoplankton communities. Sedimentary ancient DNA data was strongly correlated with biomonitoring data, while biomarkers showed weaker correlations, particularly for dinoflagellates. In addition, the sedimentary ancient DNA data indicated the past prevalence of ecological communities with no present-day analogs, highlighting the challenges of using modern observational data to infer historical biodiversity trends. The study underscores the importance of validating sedimentary approaches against observation-based data and calls for further research to improve the taxonomic resolution of metabarcoding and the specificity of biomarkers. These advancements could significantly enhance our ability to reconstruct historical biodiversity trends and inform future conservation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":18145,"journal":{"name":"Limnology and Oceanography: Methods","volume":"23 8","pages":"578-593"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://aslopubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lom3.10694","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Limnology and Oceanography: Methods","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://aslopubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lom3.10694","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LIMNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sedimentary archives can provide valuable insights into the study of anthropogenic impacts on marine and limnic ecosystems over centennial and millennial timescales, potentially extending the temporal breadth of observation-based biomonitoring. Sedimentary archives allow for the tracking of biodiversity changes over long time periods, potentially including periods before human-induced changes. However, evaluations of biodiversity reconstructions using sedimentary approaches through comparisons with existing observation-based biomonitoring data are limited. Here we compared sedimentary ancient DNA metabarcoding and several biomarkers with >50 years of phytoplankton biomonitoring data from the Baltic Sea. Our findings indicated that both sedimentary ancient DNA metabarcoding and biomarkers reveal historical trends in phytoplankton communities. Sedimentary ancient DNA data was strongly correlated with biomonitoring data, while biomarkers showed weaker correlations, particularly for dinoflagellates. In addition, the sedimentary ancient DNA data indicated the past prevalence of ecological communities with no present-day analogs, highlighting the challenges of using modern observational data to infer historical biodiversity trends. The study underscores the importance of validating sedimentary approaches against observation-based data and calls for further research to improve the taxonomic resolution of metabarcoding and the specificity of biomarkers. These advancements could significantly enhance our ability to reconstruct historical biodiversity trends and inform future conservation strategies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

利用沉积物档案方法扩展监测:生物监测、元条形码和生物标记物评估过去浮游植物动态的比较
沉积档案可以为研究百年和千年时间尺度上人类活动对海洋和湖泊生态系统的影响提供有价值的见解,有可能扩展基于观测的生物监测的时间广度。沉积档案允许跟踪生物多样性在很长一段时间内的变化,可能包括人类引起的变化之前的时期。然而,通过与现有的基于观测的生物监测数据进行比较,利用沉积方法对生物多样性重建的评价是有限的。在这里,我们将沉积古代DNA元条形码和几种生物标志物与波罗的海50年来的浮游植物生物监测数据进行了比较。研究结果表明,沉积古DNA元条形码和生物标记都揭示了浮游植物群落的历史趋势。沉积古DNA数据与生物监测数据相关性强,而生物标志物相关性较弱,特别是鞭毛藻。此外,沉积的古代DNA数据表明,过去普遍存在的生态群落没有现代的类似物,突出了使用现代观测数据推断历史生物多样性趋势的挑战。该研究强调了根据观测数据验证沉积方法的重要性,并呼吁进一步研究以提高元条形码的分类分辨率和生物标记物的特异性。这些进展可以显著增强我们重建历史生物多样性趋势的能力,并为未来的保护策略提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
56
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Limnology and Oceanography: Methods (ISSN 1541-5856) is a companion to ASLO''s top-rated journal Limnology and Oceanography, and articles are held to the same high standards. In order to provide the most rapid publication consistent with high standards, Limnology and Oceanography: Methods appears in electronic format only, and the entire submission and review system is online. Articles are posted as soon as they are accepted and formatted for publication. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods will consider manuscripts whose primary focus is methodological, and that deal with problems in the aquatic sciences. Manuscripts may present new measurement equipment, techniques for analyzing observations or samples, methods for understanding and interpreting information, analyses of metadata to examine the effectiveness of approaches, invited and contributed reviews and syntheses, and techniques for communicating and teaching in the aquatic sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信