下载PDF
{"title":"CO2 Storage Site Selection: A Comprehensive Review of Current Approaches","authors":"Shahryar Rashidi, Seyed Shariatipour, Mohammadreza Bagheri","doi":"10.1002/ghg.2349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Global warming, driven by increasing anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, has emerged as a critical environmental concern. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology offers a promising solution for reducing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, but its effectiveness depends on identifying suitable candidates that can ensure safe, long-term storage of CO<sub>2</sub>. This study proposes a systematic four-stage workflow for selecting optimal CO<sub>2</sub> storage sites, developed through a comprehensive review of existing approaches. The workflow begins with preliminary, large-scale assessments of broad geographic areas, such as sedimentary basins, using geological, technical, environmental, and economic criteria. Although these assessments provide valuable regional insights, they often lack the resolution required for precise evaluations. Site-specific frameworks bridge this gap by examining individual candidates, such as saline aquifers and depleted reservoirs. However, basic frameworks frequently oversimplify suitability evaluation by neglecting the interdependencies and uncertainties inherent in real-world conditions. To address these challenges, advanced frameworks are incorporated to apply multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods and optimization techniques, such as pinch analysis and process graphs. MCDM-based frameworks weigh conflicting criteria, whereas optimization-based frameworks ensure the technical and economic feasibility of CO<sub>2</sub> allocation in the source-to-sink matching problem. Applying this workflow to the UK context reveals the need for advanced assessments of storage candidates such as the Bunter Sandstone Formation, demonstrating that relying solely on basic frameworks is insufficient. The findings underscore the importance of integrated approaches that combine both basic and advanced suitability evaluations to enhance the robustness of site-selection practices. © 2025 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":12796,"journal":{"name":"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology","volume":"15 4","pages":"487-510"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ghg.2349","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ghg.2349","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
Global warming, driven by increasing anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, has emerged as a critical environmental concern. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology offers a promising solution for reducing CO2 emissions, but its effectiveness depends on identifying suitable candidates that can ensure safe, long-term storage of CO2 . This study proposes a systematic four-stage workflow for selecting optimal CO2 storage sites, developed through a comprehensive review of existing approaches. The workflow begins with preliminary, large-scale assessments of broad geographic areas, such as sedimentary basins, using geological, technical, environmental, and economic criteria. Although these assessments provide valuable regional insights, they often lack the resolution required for precise evaluations. Site-specific frameworks bridge this gap by examining individual candidates, such as saline aquifers and depleted reservoirs. However, basic frameworks frequently oversimplify suitability evaluation by neglecting the interdependencies and uncertainties inherent in real-world conditions. To address these challenges, advanced frameworks are incorporated to apply multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods and optimization techniques, such as pinch analysis and process graphs. MCDM-based frameworks weigh conflicting criteria, whereas optimization-based frameworks ensure the technical and economic feasibility of CO2 allocation in the source-to-sink matching problem. Applying this workflow to the UK context reveals the need for advanced assessments of storage candidates such as the Bunter Sandstone Formation, demonstrating that relying solely on basic frameworks is insufficient. The findings underscore the importance of integrated approaches that combine both basic and advanced suitability evaluations to enhance the robustness of site-selection practices. © 2025 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
二氧化碳储存地点的选择:当前方法的综合回顾
由于人为温室气体排放的增加,全球变暖已经成为一个严重的环境问题。碳捕获与封存(CCS)技术为减少二氧化碳排放提供了一个很有前途的解决方案,但其有效性取决于确定合适的候选方案,以确保安全、长期储存二氧化碳。本研究提出了一个系统的四阶段工作流程,通过对现有方法的全面审查来选择最佳的二氧化碳储存地点。该工作流程首先使用地质、技术、环境和经济标准,对广泛的地理区域(如沉积盆地)进行初步、大规模的评估。虽然这些评估提供了有价值的区域见解,但它们往往缺乏精确评估所需的解决方案。具体地点框架通过检查个别候选含水层和枯竭水库等来弥补这一差距。然而,基本框架往往忽略了现实世界条件中固有的相互依赖性和不确定性,从而过度简化了适用性评估。为了应对这些挑战,采用了先进的框架来应用多标准决策(MCDM)方法和优化技术,如夹点分析和过程图。基于mcdm的框架权衡了相互冲突的标准,而基于优化的框架确保了源-汇匹配问题中CO2分配的技术和经济可行性。将此工作流程应用到英国的环境中,表明需要对诸如Bunter砂岩地层等候选储层进行高级评估,这表明仅依赖基本框架是不够的。研究结果强调了综合方法的重要性,即结合基本和高级适宜性评估来增强选址实践的稳健性。©2025化学工业协会和John Wiley &;儿子,有限公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。