Public support for puma reintroduction in the eastern United States

IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
L. Mark Elbroch, Jazmin J. Murphy, Shelby C. Carlson, John A. Vucetich, Richard E. W. Berl, Lexi Galiardi, Shelby Perry, Tom Butler, Neil Carter, Joseph W. Hinton, Axel Moehrenschlager, Emily Carrollo, Rana Bayrakcismith, Jeremy T. Bruskotter
{"title":"Public support for puma reintroduction in the eastern United States","authors":"L. Mark Elbroch,&nbsp;Jazmin J. Murphy,&nbsp;Shelby C. Carlson,&nbsp;John A. Vucetich,&nbsp;Richard E. W. Berl,&nbsp;Lexi Galiardi,&nbsp;Shelby Perry,&nbsp;Tom Butler,&nbsp;Neil Carter,&nbsp;Joseph W. Hinton,&nbsp;Axel Moehrenschlager,&nbsp;Emily Carrollo,&nbsp;Rana Bayrakcismith,&nbsp;Jeremy T. Bruskotter","doi":"10.1111/csp2.70105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pumas (<i>Puma concolor</i>) are among the species identified as having the potential to enhance ecosystem function. Previous research highlights sufficient ecological habitat to support pumas in the eastern United States; however, their reintroduction requires social and institutional support as well. To this end, we conducted research to assess attitudes about puma reintroduction among key constituencies like hunters, rural residents, and young people. We sampled 2756 respondents across seven states (Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, New York, Pennsylvania, Vermont, and West Virginia). Ratios of strong support (for puma reintroduction) to strong opposition across states ranged from 4:1 to 13:1, and support outweighed opposition in every state. Our results contrasted with common assumptions that hunters, rural residents, and people who identify as politically conservative oppose carnivore conservation and reintroduction. We found marginal differences among categories of people, but overall little variation in support exhibited by different groups. People who identified very strongly as hunters were more supportive of reintroduction than those who did not identify as hunters at all. Taken together, the presence of quality habitat and support for puma restoration warrant further exploration. However, federal funding for state-based restoration efforts likely requires the inclusion of pumas in State Wildlife Action Plans (SWAPs), which are currently under a 10-year revision due to be published this year (2025).</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"7 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.70105","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.70105","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pumas (Puma concolor) are among the species identified as having the potential to enhance ecosystem function. Previous research highlights sufficient ecological habitat to support pumas in the eastern United States; however, their reintroduction requires social and institutional support as well. To this end, we conducted research to assess attitudes about puma reintroduction among key constituencies like hunters, rural residents, and young people. We sampled 2756 respondents across seven states (Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, New York, Pennsylvania, Vermont, and West Virginia). Ratios of strong support (for puma reintroduction) to strong opposition across states ranged from 4:1 to 13:1, and support outweighed opposition in every state. Our results contrasted with common assumptions that hunters, rural residents, and people who identify as politically conservative oppose carnivore conservation and reintroduction. We found marginal differences among categories of people, but overall little variation in support exhibited by different groups. People who identified very strongly as hunters were more supportive of reintroduction than those who did not identify as hunters at all. Taken together, the presence of quality habitat and support for puma restoration warrant further exploration. However, federal funding for state-based restoration efforts likely requires the inclusion of pumas in State Wildlife Action Plans (SWAPs), which are currently under a 10-year revision due to be published this year (2025).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

公众支持在美国东部重新引入美洲狮
美洲狮(美洲狮)是被认为具有增强生态系统功能潜力的物种之一。先前的研究强调,美国东部有足够的生态栖息地来支持美洲狮;然而,它们的重新引入也需要社会和机构的支持。为此,我们进行了一项研究,以评估猎人、农村居民和年轻人等关键群体对美洲狮重新引入的态度。我们在七个州(马萨诸塞州、缅因州、新罕布什尔州、纽约州、宾夕法尼亚州、佛蒙特州和西弗吉尼亚州)抽样调查了2756名受访者。在各州,强烈支持(重新引入美洲狮)和强烈反对的比例从4:1到13:1不等,在每个州,支持都超过反对。我们的研究结果与猎人、农村居民和政治上保守的人反对食肉动物保护和重新引入的普遍假设形成对比。我们发现不同类别的人之间存在细微差异,但不同群体在支持度上的总体差异不大。那些认为自己是猎人的人比那些根本不认为自己是猎人的人更支持放归。综上所述,优质栖息地的存在和对美洲狮恢复的支持值得进一步探索。然而,为各州的恢复工作提供联邦资金可能需要将美洲狮纳入州野生动物行动计划(swap),该计划目前正在进行为期10年的修订,将于今年(2025年)公布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conservation Science and Practice
Conservation Science and Practice BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
240
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信